Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of roughness on the average and pulsating velocity characteristics

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    For all types of roughness the vertical distribution of the average velocities obeys the logarithmic law.

  2. 2.

    The dynamic roughness increases with increase in the geometric roughness.

  3. 3.

    With an increase of relative roughness of the bottom y0/H within limits from 0.5·10−3 to 6.4·10−3 the von Karman constant increases from 0.37 to 0.55 and then it decreases to 0.18.

  4. 4.

    The intensity of turbulence depends linearly on the relative roughness of the bottom.

  5. 5.

    The height of the near-bottom layer, determined from the position of the maximum value of the standard deviation of the longitudinal velocity component, increases with increase in the relative roughness of the bottom.

  6. 6.

    The intensity of the velocity fluctuations increases with increase in the diameter of the roughness projections. Inhomogeneity of the size of the roughness projections promotes an increase in the intensity of pulsations. In the case of a separated arrangement of the roughness projections the pulsation intensity also increases.

  7. 7.

    Channel flow has a layerwise eddy structure. We can assume that the axis of rotation of the eddies occurring near the bottom changes during their penetration into the mass of the flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. I. K. Nikitin, Turbulent Channel Flow and Processes in the Near-Bottom Region [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk Ukr. SSR, Kiev (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. A. Fridman, “Effect of wall roughness on the makeup of a turbulent flow,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR,12, No. 3 (1948).

  3. N. B. Mulyukova, D. N. Nabotov, and A. É. Reikhrudel’, “Full-scale investigations of small mountain streams of the Tadzhik SSR,” in: Sediment Transport in Open Channels [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. V. Aref’eva, G. S. Berlin, N. A. Melekhova, and V. V. Tsvetkova, “Two-component mechanotron transducer for measuring the velocity of a liquid flow,” Izmeritel’. Tekh., No. 1 (1975).

  5. G. S. Berlin and S. A. Rozentul, Mechanotron Transducers and Their Use [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. I. Rossinskii, “Bed-load movement,” Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Gidrologicheskogo Instituta, No. 160 (1968).

  7. D. N. Nabotov, “Investigation of the velocity field in the presence of increased bottom roughness,” in: Sediment Transport in Open Channels [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. A. Mikhailova and D. N. Nabotov, “Investigation of turbulence of a flashy stream with an increased bottom roughness,” Metrologiya i Gidrologiya, No. 5 (1975).

  9. B. A. Fridman, “Energy conversion in a turbulent flow carrying heavy suspended particles,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, No. 9 (1952).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’stvo, No. 6, pp. 40–44, June, 1976.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melekhova, N.A., Mikhailova, N.A. & Petrov, V.P. Effect of roughness on the average and pulsating velocity characteristics. Hydrotechnical Construction 10, 595–601 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02399220

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02399220

Keywords

Navigation