Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 75, Issue 1–4, pp 93–100 | Cite as

Nuclear moments around the Z=40 shell closure:91mY,95Zr and97Nb

  • I. Berkes
  • M. De Jesus
  • B. Hlimi
  • M. Massaq
  • E. H. Sayouty
  • K. Heyde
Nuclear Moments

Abstract

Magnetic moments around the Z=40 shell closure have been established using nuclear magnetic resonance on oriented nuclei (NMR/ON) in iron. From the resonance frequencies we established |μ(91Y;9/2+)|=5.96(6)μN, |μ(95Zr;5/2+)|= 1.103(23)μN, | μ(97Nb;9/2+)| = 6.153(5)μN. From the electric quadrupole alignement of95Zr+95Nb in a Zr single crystal Q(95Zr)=+0.29(5)b and Q(95Nb)<0 have been derived. The results obtained are discussed using the Nilsson deformed single particle model. It is shown that for certain deformation regions, a measurement of the magnetic moment can give information on the nuclear quadrupole deformation.

Keywords

Iron Thin Film Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Resonance Frequency Single Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. /1/.
    I. Berkes, M. Fahad, R. Hassani, M. Massaq and N.J. Stone Hyp. Int.43, (1988) 477.Google Scholar
  2. /2/.
    M. Fahad, I. Berkes, M. Massaq, T.L. Shaw and N.J. Stone Hyp. Int.43, (1988) 307.Google Scholar
  3. /3/.
    L.C. Carraz, S. Sundell, H.L. Ravn, M. Skarestad and L. Westgaard Nucl. Instr. & Meth.58 (1969) 69.Google Scholar
  4. /4/.
    K. Schlosser, I. Berkes, E. Hagn, P. Herzog, T. Niinikoski, P. Postma, C. Richard-Serre, R. Rikovska, N.J. Stone, L. Vanneste and E. Zech Hyp. Int.43 (1988) 141Google Scholar
  5. /5/.
    N.J. Stone in Low temperature nuclear orientation, p. 660 (Eds: N.J. Stone and H. Postma), North Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam, 1986Google Scholar
  6. /6/.
    B. Hinfürtner, E. Hagn, E. Zech and E. Eder, Phys. Rev. Lett.66 (1991) 96CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. /7/.
    R. Eder, E. Hagn and E. Zech Nucl. Phys.A451 (1986) 46CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. /8/.
    A.R. Arends and F. Pleiter Hyp. Int.7 (1979) 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. /9/.
    C. Violet and D. Pipkorn J. Appl. Phys.42 (1971) 4339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. /10/.
    P. Raghavan, M. Semba, Z.Z. Ding, A. Lopez-Garcia, B.A. Brown and R.S. Raghavan Phys. Rev. Let.,54 (1985) 2592CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. /11/.
    J. Bendahan, C. Broude, E. Dafni, G. Goldring, M. Hass, F. Naim and M.H. Rafailovich Phys. Rev.C33 (1986) 1517.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. /12/.
    K.S. Krane, C.E. Olsen, S.S. Rosenblum and W.A. Steyert Phys. Rev.C13 (1976) 831CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. /13/.
    P. Möller and J.R. Nix Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables26 (1981) 165CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. /14/.
    K. Heyde, M. Waroquier and P. Van Isacker, Phys. Rev.C22 (1980) 1267CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. /15/.
    P. Raghavan Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables42 (1989) 189CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. /16/.
    K. Heyde Contribution to this conferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G., Scientific Publishing Company 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Berkes
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. De Jesus
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Hlimi
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Massaq
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. H. Sayouty
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. Heyde
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, IN2P3-CNRSVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.Université Claude BernardVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  3. 3.Institute for Theoretical Physics and Institute for Nuclear PhysicsGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations