Abstract
A possible response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration is to attempt to increase the amount of carbon stored in terrestrial vegetation. One approach to increasing the size of the terrestrial carbon sink is to increase the growth of forests by utilizing intensive forest management practices. This article uses data from the literature and from forest growth and yield models to analyze the impact of three management practices on carbon storage: thinning, fertilization, and control of competing vegetation. Using Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) as example species, results from experiments with computer simulation models suggest that, for these two species, thinning generally does not increase carbon storage and may actually cause a decrease. The exception is thinning of very dense young stands. Fertilization generally increases carbon storage, although the response can be quite variable. The largest gains in carbon storage are likely to come from fertilizing lower-quality sites and from fertilizing thinned or less dense stands. Forests usually show increased growth in response to fertilization over a wide range of ages. Simulation of the growth of loblolly pine indicates that controlling competing vegetation at an early age helps to maximize stand growth and carbon storage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Abrahamson, D. E. 1989. Global warming: The issue, impacts, responses. Pages 3–34in D. E. Abrahamson (ed.), The challenge of global warming. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Ballard, R. 1981. Optimum nitrogen rates for fertilization of loblolly pine plantations.Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 5:212–216.
Ballard, R., and J. S. Shumway. 1986. Soil and site information for optimum management of Douglas-fir. Pages 168–176in C. O. Oliver, D. P. Hanley, and J. A. Johnson (eds.), Douglas-fir: Stand management for the future. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ballard, R., H. W. Duzan, and M. B. Kane. 1981. Thinning and fertilization of loblolly pine plantations. Pages 100–104in J. P. Barnett (ed.), Proceedings of the first biennial southern silviculture research conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SO-34, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Brown, S., A. E. Lugo, and J. Chapman. 1986. Biomass of tropical tree plantations and its implications for the global carbon budget.Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:390–394.
Brown, S., A. J. R. Gillespie, and A. E. Lugo. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data.Forest Science 35:881–902.
Burkhart, H. E., K. D. Farrar, R. L. Amateis, and R. F. Daniels. 1987. Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in loblolly pine plantations on cutover, site-prepared areas. School of Forestry and Wildlife Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Publ FWS-1-87, 25 pp.
Comerford, N. B., R. F. Fisher, and W. L. Pritchett. 1982. Advances in forest fertilization on the southeastern coastal plain. Pages 370–378in R. Ballard and S. P. Gessel (eds.), I.U.F.R.O. symposium on forest site and continuous productivity. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-163. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.
Curtis, R. O., G. W. Clendenen, D. L. Reukema, and D. J. DeMars. 1982. Yield tables for managed stands of coast Douglas-fir. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-135, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.
Drew, T. J., and J. W. Flewelling. 1979. Stand density management: An alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations.Forest Science 25:518–532.
Duzan, H. W., and H. L. Allen. 1981. Estimating fertilizer response in site-prepared pine plantations using basal area and site index. Pages 219–222in J. P. Barnett (ed.), Proceedings of the first biennial southern silviculture research conference. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Dyson, F. J. 1977. Can we control the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?Energy 2:287–291.
Farnum, P., R. Timmis, and J. L. Kulp. 1983. Biotechnology of forest yield.Science 219:694–702.
Johnson, W. C., and D. M. Sharpe. 1983. The ratio of total to merchantable forest biomass and the application to the global carbon budget.Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13:372–383.
Marland, G. 1988. The prospect for solving the CO2 problem through reforestation. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Resources. DOE/NBB-0082, 66 pp.
Marland, G. 1989. The role of forests in addressing the CO2 greenhouse. Pages 199–212in J. C. White (ed.), Global climate change linkages: Acid rain, air quality and stratospheric ozone. Elsevier Publishing, New York.
Miller, R. E., and S. R. Webster. 1979. Fertilizer response in mature stands of Douglas-fir. Pages 126–132in S. P. Gessel, R. M. Kenady, and W. A. Atkinson (eds.), Proceedings: Forest Fertilization conference. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Miller, R. E., P. R. Barker, C. E. Peterson, and S. R. Webster. 1986. Using nitrogen fertilizers in management of coast Douglas-fir: I. Regional trends of response. Pages 290–303in C. O. Oliver, D. P. Hanley, and J. A. Johnson (eds.), Douglas-fir: Stand management for the future. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Peterson, C. E., and S. P. Gessel. 1982. Forest fertilization in the Pacific Northwest: Results of the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project. Pages 365–369in R. Ballard and S. P. Gessel (eds.), I.U.F.R.O. symposium on forest site and continuous productivity. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-163. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.
Schroeder, P. E., and L. Ladd. 1991. Slowing the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide: A biological approach.Climatic Change (in press).
Sedjo, R. 1989. Forests to offset the greenhouse effect.Journal of Forestry 87(7):12–15.
Sittig, M. 1979. Fertilizer industry processes, pollution control, and energy conservation. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey.
Smith, D. M. 1962. The practice of silviculture. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 578 pp.
Waring, R. H., and W. H. Schlesinger. 1985. Forest ecosystems: Concepts and management. Academic Press, New York, 340 pp.
White, J. 1981. The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule.Journal of Theoretical Biology 89:475–500.
Woodwell, G. M. 1987. The warming of the industrialized middle latitudes. Unpublished paper. Workshop on developing policies for responding to future climate change, Villach, Austria, 15 pp.
Yoda, K., T. Kira, H. Osawa, and K. Hozuni. 1963. Self-thinning in overcrowed pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions.Journal of the Institute of Polytechnics, Osaka City University. Series E 14:107–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research described in this article has been funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency. This document has been prepared at the EPA Environmental Research Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, through contract number 68-C8-0006 to NSI Technology Inc. It has been subjected to the agency’s peer and administrative review and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schroeder, P. Can intensive management increase carbon storage in forests?. Environmental Management 15, 475–481 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394738