Skip to main content
Log in

Selecting islands and shoals for conservation based on biological and aesthetic criteria

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consideration of biological quality has long been an important component of rating areas for conservation. Often these same areas are highly valued by people for aesthetic reasons, creating demands for housing and recreation that may conflict with protection plans for these habitats. Most methods of selecting land for conservation purposes use biological factors alone. For some land areas, analysis of aesthetic qualities is also important in describing the scenic value of undisturbed land. A method for prioritizing small islands and shoals based on both biological and visual quality factors is presented here. The study included 169 undeveloped islands and shoals ⩽0.8 ha in the Thousand Islands Region of the St. Lawrence River, New York. Criteria such as critical habitat for uncommon plant and animal species were considered together with visual quality and incorporated into a rating system that ranked the islands and shoals according to their priority for conservation management and protection from development. Biological factors were determined based on previous research and a field survey. Visual quality was determined by visual diagnostic criteria developed from public responses to photographs of a sample of islands. Variables such as elevation, soil depth, and type of plant community can be used to classify islands into different categories of visual quality but are unsuccessful in classifying islands into categories of overall biological quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anselin, A., P. M. Meire, and L. Anselin. 1989. Multicriteria techniques in ecological evaluation: An example using the analytical hierarchy process.Biological Conservation 49:215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beschel, R. E., A. E. Garwood, R. Hainault, I. D. Macdonald, S. P. van der Kloet, and C. H. Zavitz. 1970. List of the vascular plants of the Kingston region. Fowler Herbarium, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, 92 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, W. H., and R. P. Grossenheider. 1976. A field guide to the mammals (of) North America north of Mexico, 3rd ed. Peterson Field Guide Series. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 289 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, T. T., V. Brack, Jr., and V. R. Holmes. 1989. Simplified method for wetland habitat assessment.Environmental Managment 13:207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cody, W. J. 1975. The vascular plants of the Thousand Islands National Park Region. Biosystematics Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario, 80 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, R. 1975. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians of Eastern and Central North America. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 429 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duever, L. C., and R. F. Noss. 1990. A computerized method of priority ranking for natural areas. Pages 22–33in R. S. Mitchell, C. J. Sheviak, and D. J. Leopold (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th annual natural areas conference, Ecosystem management: Rare species and significant habitats. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 471, The University of the State of New York, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellyer, G. M. 1989. Inventory, acquisition and management of the human-modified landscape of the “Punkhorn.” Pages 276–287in R. S. Mitchell, C. J. Sheviak, and D. J. Leopold (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th annual natural areas conference, Ecosystem management: Rare species and significant habitats. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 471, The University of the State of New York, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. D. 1977. Methods for generating land suitability maps: A comparative evaluation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 43:386–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, H. D. 1924. Annotated list of the ferns and flowering plants of New York State. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 254. The University of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 759 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. B., IV, and A. Harvey. 1989. Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks.Environment and Behavior 21:323–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G. 1990. A method of prioritizing small islands and shoals for conservation based on biological and aesthetic criteria. MS thesis. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, M. G., D. J. Leopold, R. C. Smardon, and S. R. LaPan. 1990. Conservation of small islands and emergent shoals in the Thousand Islands Region. IEPP #90-001. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 57 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C., and M. B. Usher. 1981. Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review.Biological Conservation 21:79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C., and M. B. Usher. 1984. Conservation evaluation in practice: I. Sites of different habitats in north-east Yorkshire, Great Britain.Journal of Environmental Management 18:153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsap, B. A., J. A. Gore, D. E. Runde, and S. I. Cerulean. 1990. Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida.Wildlife Monographs 111:1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. S. 1986. A checklist of New York State plants. New York State Museum Bulletin No. 458. The University of the State of New York, Albany, New York, 272 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYNHP (New York Natural Heritage Program). 1989. New York rare plant and animal status list. NYNHP, Latham, New York, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). 1978. Environmental assessment FY 1979: Winter navigation demonstration on St. Lawrence River, vols I, II & summary. NYSDEC in conjunction with SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Institute of Environmental Program Affairs, Syracuse, New York, 667 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). 1986. Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats. NYSDEC, Region 6, Watertown, New York, unnum. pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). 1987a. Endangered, threatened, and special concern species of New York State. NYSDEC, Albany, New York, 2 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. 1987b. Final regulations related to 1986 environmental quality bond act, title 7: Land acquisition, preservation and improvement projects. NYSDEC, Albany, New York, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, L. J., and A. B. Carey. 1986. Introduction: When habitats fail as predictors. Pages 207–208in J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph (eds.), Wildlife 2000. Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. T. 1980. A field guide to the birds of Eastern and Central North America. The Peterson Field Guide Series. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts, 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschke, C. 1990. Ecological communities of New York State. New York Natural Heritage Program, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Latham, New York, 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, S. S., R. C. Smardon, A. Rice, and G. Jordan. 1990. St. Lawrence River scenic quality study. Faculty of Landscape Architecture, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 49 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C. 1987. Visual access to 1000 lakes.Landscape Architecture 77:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C. 1988. Visual impact assessment for island and coastal environments.Impact Assessment Bulletin 6:5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C., W. M. Price, and M. R. Volpe. 1984. St. Lawrence River scenic access study. ESF 84-004. School of Landscape Architecture, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 100 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C., J. F. Palmer, and J. P. Felleman (eds.). 1986. Foundations for visual project analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 374 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C., J. F. Palmer, A. Knopf, K. Grinde, J. E. Henderson, and L. Peyman-Dove. 1988. Visual resources assessment procedure for US Army Corps of Engineers. Instruction Report EL-88-1. Prepared by State University of New York, Syracuse for US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 71 pp.

  • Smith, G. S. 1987. Survey of the common tern population in the international sector of the St. Lawrence River and U.S. waters of Lake Ontario—1986. Prepared by Onondaga Audubon Chapter in cooperation with the New York State Office of the National Audubon Society for New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Nongame Unit, Syracuse, New York, 19 pp.

  • Smith, P. G. R., and J. B. Theberge. 1986. Evaluating biotic diversity in environmentally significant areas in the Northwest Territories of Canada.Biological Conservation 36:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C. 1990. Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: The Loop Road in Acadia National Park, U.S.A.Landscape and Urban Planning 19:213–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 1989. Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row, New York, 746 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tans, W. 1974. Priority ranking of natural areas.The Michigan Botanist 13:31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 1974. National forest landscape management, Vol. 2, Chapter 1: The visual management system. USDA Handbook 462. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Procedure to establish priorities in landscape architecture. USDA S.C.S. Tech. Release 65, Washington, DC, 19 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI Bureau of Land Management. 1980. Visual resource management program. Division of Recreation and Cultural Resource. Stock No. 0024-011-000116-6. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 38 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knutson, M.G., Leopold, D.J. & Smardon, R.C. Selecting islands and shoals for conservation based on biological and aesthetic criteria. Environmental Management 17, 199–210 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394690

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394690

Key words