Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Costs and benefits of urban erosion and sediment control: The North Carolina experience

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The EPA’s new nonpoint source pollution control requirements will soon institutionalize urban erosion and sediment pollution control practices nationwide. The public and private sector costs and social benefits associated with North Carolina’s program (one of the strongest programs in the country in terms of implementation authority, staffing levels, and comprehensiveness of coverage) are examined to provide general policy guidance on questions relating to the likely burden the new best management practices will have on the development industry, the likely costs and benefits of such a program, and the feasibility of running a program on a cost recovery basis. We found that urban erosion and sediment control requirements were not particularly burdensome to the development industry (adding about 4% on average to development costs). Public-sector program costs ranged between $2.4 and $4.8 million in fiscal year 1989. Our contingent valuation survey suggests that urban households in North Carolina are willing to pay somewhere between $7.1 and $14.2 million a year to maintain current levels of sediment pollution control. Our benefit-cost analysis suggests that the overall ratio is likely to be positive, although a definitive figure is elusive. Lastly, we found that several North Carolina localities have cost recovery fee systems that are at least partially self-financing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abel, P. D. 1989. Water pollution biology. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt G. H., E. S. Conyers, F. J. Lowes, J. W. Mighton, and Pollack, J. W. 1972. An economic analysis of erosion and sediment control for watersheds undergoing urbanization. Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D. S., M. A. Thayer, W. D. Schulze, and R. C. d’Arge. 1982. Valuing public goods: a comparison of survey and hedonic approaches.American Economic Review 72:165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. H., J. A. Haverkamp, and D. Chapman. 1985. Eroding soils: The off-farm impacts. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colacicco, D., T. Osborn, and K. Alt. 1989 Economic damage from soil erosion.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(1):35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. J., and D. R. Lenat. 1989. Effects of land use on the water quality and biota of three streams in the Piedmont Province of North Carolina, US Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 89-4007. Raleigh, North Carolina.

  • Crowder, B. M. 1987. Economic costs of reservoir sedimentation: a regional approach to estimating cropland erosion damages.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation May–June 194–197.

  • Dendy, F. E. 1968. Sedimentation in the nation’s reservoirs.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 23(4):135–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. 1978.Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMento, J. F. 1986. Environmental law and American business: Dilemmas of compliance. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S., and F. E. Springer. 1990. Major sedimentation issues and ongoing investigations at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.In H. H. Chang and J. C. Hill (eds.), Hydraulic engineering; Proceedings of the 1990 national conference. ASCE, New York, pp. 1015–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, T., and P. Braestrup. 1981. The new issues: Land, water and energy. The Wilson Quarterly 5(3):122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, C. P., H. M. Peskin, P. Croisson, and C. Puffer. 1986. Nonpoint source pollution: Are cropland controls the answer?Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41:215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. J., K. Jackson, and T. A. Bursztynsky. 1986. Erosion & sediment control handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, H. P. 1972. Urban sedimentation—in perspective. Proceeding of the American Society of Civil Engineers.Journal of the Hydraulics Division December:2099–2116.

  • Lee, E. S., R. N. Forthoffer, and R. J. Lorimor. 1989. Analyzing complex survey data. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luger, M. I., and R. G. Paterson. 1991. The willingness to pay for environmental management: Evidence from North Carolina. Unpublished manuscript. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcom, H. R., R. J. Burby, E. J. Kaiser, M. I. Luger, R. G. Paterson, and A. C. Beard. 1990. Evaluation of the North Carolina erosion and sedimentation control program. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. F. 1981. Biology of freshwater pollution. Longman Group Ltd., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertes J. D. 1989. Trends in governmental control of erosion and sedimentation in urban development.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(6):550–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, E. J. 1982. Cost-benefit analysis. George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C., and R. T. Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, C. R., and E. K Yaremko. 1989. Identifying causes and predicting effects of bank erosion.In M. A. Ports (ed.), Hydraulic engineering: Proceedings of the 1989 conference on hydraulic engineering. New Orleans, Louisiana, 14–18 August, 1989. ASCE Publication, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny, V., and G. Chesters. 1989. Delivery of sediment and pollutants from nonpoint sources: A water quality perspective.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44(1):568–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, O. S. 1975. Natural resource conservation. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, C. A., III, and F. D. Miner, Jr. 1988. Valuation of improved air quality in Utah County, USA.Journal of Environmental Management 12(3):381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, H. L., Jr. 1976. Comprehensive erosion and sediment control program for job superintendents and inspectors, sediment control manpower project. National Association of Conservation Districts, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M. C., and C. E. Young. 1989. Estimating the water quality benefits from soil erosion control.Water Resources Bulletin 25(1):71–78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, B. D. 1987. Erosion control improves community water supply.Public Works 118(1):80, 114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samples, K. C. 1985. A note on the existence of starting point bias in iterative bidding games.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 10:32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, L. D., R. G. Walsh, and J. R. McKean. 1991. Comparable estimates of the recreational value of rivers.Water Resources Research 27(7):1387–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueler, T. R. 1987. A practical manual for planning and designing urban BMPs. Metropolitan Council of Governments, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schueler, T. R., and J. Lugbill. 1990. Performance of current sediment control measures at Maryland construction sites. Department of Environmental Programs, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. D., R. C. d’Arge, and D. S. Brookshire. 1981. Valuing environmental commodities: Some recent experiments.Land Economics 57(2):151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seller, C., J. R. Stoll, and J. P. Chavas. 1985. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: A comparison of nonmarket techniques.Land Economics 61(2):156–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S. D., and B. E. Lindsay. 1990. The willingness to pay for groundwater protection.Water Resources Research 26(9):1869–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. E. 1987. Sediment characteristics of North Carolina streams. Raleigh, North Carolina. USGS Open-File Report 870-701.

  • Stoll, J. R., W. Smathers, and R. N. Shulstad. 1984. An overview of current issues in nonmarket valuation.In J. R. Stoll, W. Smathers, and R. N. Shulstad (eds.), Nonmarket valuation: Current status, future directions. Southern Rural Development Center and Farm Foundation. SRDC Series No. 66.

  • Sugden, R., and A. Williams. 1978. The principles of practical cost-benefit analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R. J., and R. G. Walsh. 1985. Effect of distance on the preservation of water quality.Land Economics 61(3):281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, M. A. 1981. Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: Further evidence.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Water Resources Council. 1979. Procedures for evaluation of national economic benefits and costs in water resources planning; Final rule.Federal Register 44(242):72, 891–976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C., and E. O. Heady. 1977. Controlling nonpoint sediment sources with cropland management: A national economic assessment.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59:13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. G., J. B. Loomis, and R. A. Gillman. 1984. Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness.Land Economics 60(1):14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J. L., S. Grindstaff, C. McIlwain, G. White, and R. Bacon. 1982. A comparison of trout population, reproduction success, and characteristics of a heavily silted and relatively unsilted stream in western North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D., J. Briscoe, X. Ming, and W. Barron. 1990. Estimating the willingness to pay for water services in developing countries: A case study of the use of contingent valuation surveys in southern Haiti.Economic Development and Cultural Change 38:293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community and Regional Planning, University of Texas, 78712-1160, Austin, Texas, USA

    Robert G. Paterson

  2. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, 27599-3140, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

    Michael I. Luger

  3. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina, 27599-3140, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

    Raymond J. Burby & Edward J. Kaiser

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, 27695, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA

    H. Rooney Malcom & Alicia C. Beard

Authors
  1. Robert G. Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael I. Luger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raymond J. Burby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward J. Kaiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Rooney Malcom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alicia C. Beard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This article is based on research by the authors for the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR). The views are those of the research team and do not necessarily reflect the position of DEHNR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paterson, R.G., Luger, M.I., Burby, R.J. et al. Costs and benefits of urban erosion and sediment control: The North Carolina experience. Environmental Management 17, 167–178 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394687

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394687

Key words

Search

Navigation