Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental cleanup: The challenge at the Hanford Site, Washington, USA

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous challenges face those involved with developing a coordinated and consistent approach to cleaning up the US Department of Energy’s (DOE) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington. These challenges are much greater than those encountered when the site was selected and the world’s first nuclear complex was developed almost 50 years ago. This article reviews Hanford’s history, operations, waste storage/disposal activities, environmental monitoring, and today’s approach to characterize and clean up Hanford under a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, signed by DOE, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Washington Sate Department of Ecology. Although cleanup of defense-related waste at Hanford holds many positive benefits, negative features include high costs to the US taxpayer, numerous uncertainties concerning the technologies to be employed and the risks involved, and the high probability that special interest groups and activists at large will never be completely satisfied. Issues concerning future use of the site, whether to protect and preserve its natural features or open it to public exploitation, remain to be resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ballinger, M. Y., and R. B. Hall. 1989. A history of major Hanford operations involving radioactive material. PNL-6964 HEDR, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. D. 1973. Aquatic bioenvironmental studies in the Columbia River at Hanford 1945–1971. A bibliography with abstracts. BNWL-1734, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland. Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. D. 1990. Aquatic bioenvironmental studies: The Hanford experience 1944–84. Studies in environmental science 39. Elsevier Science Publishing, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. D., and R. H. Gray. 1989. Abstracted publications related to the Hanford environment, 1980 to 1988. PNL-6905, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. D., and R. H. Gray. 1992. Past and present water quality conditions in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 22:137–152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1985. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Program. DOE Order 5480.14. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1987a. History of the production complex: The methods of site selection. DOE/NV/10594-H1. US Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1987b. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Program. Draft Notice N5480.xx. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1987c. Disposal of Hanford defense high-level, transuranic and tank wastes, final environmental impact statement for the Hanford Site. DOE/EIS-0113, 5 volumes. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1989a. Hanford site waste management units report. DOE/Rl 99-30, 2 volumes. US Department of Energy-Richland Operations, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1989b. Environmental restoration and waste management five-year plan. DOE/S-0070. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1989c. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Requirements. DOE 5400.4. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1990. Basic research for environmental restoration. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1991a. Environmental restoration and waste management, five year plan, fiscal years 1993–1997. DOE/S-0089. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1991b. Environmental restoration and waste management site-specific plan for the Richland operations office, Hanford Site five-year plan. Fiscal years 1993–1997. US Department of Energy, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1991c. Final report on DOE nuclear facilities. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 1976. National interim primary drinking water regulations. EPA-570/9-76-003. Office of Water Supply, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 1988a. Guidance for conducting remedial investigations and feasibility studies under CERCLA, OSWER directive 9355.3-01. EPA/540/G-89/004. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 1988b. Draft guidance on preparing Superfund decision documents: The proposed plan and record of decision, OSWER directive 9355.3-02. EPA/540/G-89/004. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA. 1989. National priorities list data packages for the US DOE Hanford 100 area, US DOE Hanford 200 area, US DOE Hanford 300 area, and US DOE Hanford 1100 area. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDA. 1975. Final environmental statement, waste management operation, Hanford Reservation. Energy Research and Development Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. C., R. W. Bryce, and D. R. Sherwood. 1989. Hanford site ground-water monitoring for January through June 1988. PNL-6886. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzner, R. E., and R. H. Gray. 1991. The status distribution and ecology of wildlife on the US DOE Hanford site: A historical overview of research activities.Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 18:173–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, K. 1989. Prosecution of a Superfund action.Environmental Reporter 756–762.

  • Geffen, C. A., B. A. Garret, C. E. Cowan, M. R. Siegel, and J. R. Keller. 1989. Remediation of DOE hazardous waste sites: Planning and integration requirements. PNL-6972. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. E., and M. S. Hanson. 1990. Inactive waste sites at Hanford: The technical and management challenge. Pages 183–194.in Waste management 1990 conference, working toward a cleaner environment. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, R. E., R. C. Arnett, R. G. Baca, L. S. Leonhart, and F. A. Spane, Jr. 1979. Hydrologic studies within the Columbia Plateau, Washington: An integration of current knowledge. RHO-BWI-ST-5. Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. J., M. D. Hall, S. R. Strait, and W. R. Brown. 1981. Hydrology of the separations area. RHO-ST-42. Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H. 1991. Cleaning up radioactive and chemical waste sites: Is the benefit worth the cost and risk?Fisheries 16:2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H. 1992. Multimedia environmental and biological surveillance at the US Department of Energy’s Hanford site southeastern Washington.In R. L. Jolley and R. G. M. Wang (eds.), Effective and safe waste management: Interfacing sciences and engineering with monitoring and risk analysis. CRC Press, Boco Raton, Florida (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., and W. H. Rickard. 1989. The protected area of Hanford as a refugium for native plants and animals.Environmental Conservation 16:250–260, 215–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., and W. H. Richard. 1991. The Hanford Reservation: A refuge for native plants and animals. Pages 66–73in Proceedings V, issues and technology in the management of impacted wildlife. Thorne Ecological Institute, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., R. E. Jaquish, P. J. Mitchell, and W. H. Rickard. 1989. Environmental monitoring at Hanford, Washington, USA: A brief site history and summary of recent results.Environmental Management 13:563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groueff, S. 1967. The Manhattan project. The untold story of the making of the atomic bomb. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, L. R. 1962. Now it can be told—the story of the Manhattan project. Da Copo Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, K. A., R. A. Peloquin, and R. D. Stenner. 1986. Modified hazard ranking system for sites with mixed radioactive and hazardous wastes—user manual. PNL-5841. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquish, R. E., and R. W. Bryce (eds.) 1989. Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1988. PNL-6825. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquish, R. E., and R. W. Bryce (eds.). 1990. Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1989. PNL-7346. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, V. C. 1985. Manhattan: The army and the atomic bomb. Center of Military History, United States Army, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRP. 1987a. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Report No. 93. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRP. 1987b. Exposure of the population in the United States and Canada from natural background radiation. Report No. 94. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitzel, D. A. (ed.) 1979. A summary of environmental effects studies on the Columbia River 1972 through 1978. Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPS. 1992. The Hanford Reach of the Columbia River, draft river conservation study and environmental impact statement. National Park Service, US Department of the Interior, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, D. T. 1972. National radiation exposure in the United States. ORP/SID 72-1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA. 1991. Complex cleanup: The environmental legacy of nuclear weapons production. OTA-0484. Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • PNL. 1990a. Draft air pathway report. Phase I of the Hanford environmental dose reconstruction project. PNL-7412. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • PNL. 1990b. Draft Columbia River pathway report. Phase I of the Hanford environmental dose reconstruction project. PNL-7411. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, W. H., and D. G. Watson. 1985. Four decades of environmental change and their influence upon native wildlife and fish on the mid-Columbia River, Washington, USA.Environmental Conservation 12:241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, W. H., L. E. Rogers, B. E. Vaughan, and S. F. Liebetrau (eds.). 1988. Shrub-stepp, balance and change in a semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem. Developments in agriculture and managed-forest ecology 20. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., E. W. Colglazier, and M. R. English. 1991. Hazardous waste remediation: The task ahead. University of Tennessee Waste Management Research Institute, Knoxville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenner, R. D., K. H. Cramer, K. A. Highley, S. J. Jette, D. A. Lamar, T. J. McLaughlin, D. R. Sherwood, and N. C. Van Houten. 1988. Hazard ranking system evaluation of CER-CLA inactive waste sites at Hanford. PNL-6456, 3 volumes. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • TPA. 1989. Hanford federal facility agreement and consent order. Washington State Department of Ecology, US Environmental Protection Agency, and US Department of Energy, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, C. C., and C. B. Doty. 1989. Superfund: A program without priorities.Environmental Science and Technology 23:1333–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WDSHS. 1983. Public water supplies. Washington Administration Code, Chapter 248-54 (revised). Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHC. 1989. Preliminary operable units designation project. WHC-EP-0216. Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. K., and R. W. Hanf (eds.) 1991. Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1990. PNL-7930. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. K., and R. W. Hanf (eds.) 1992. Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1991. PNL-8148. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Office of Hanford Environment, USA

    Robert H. Gray

  2. Earth and Environmental Sciences Center, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, 99352, Richland, Washington, USA

    C. Dale Becker

Authors
  1. Robert H. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Dale Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gray, R.H., Becker, C.D. Environmental cleanup: The challenge at the Hanford Site, Washington, USA. Environmental Management 17, 461–475 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394662

Key words

Search

Navigation