Abstract
Following an extensive legal battle challenging its original decision to not extend the protection of the Endangered Species Act to the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), the US Fish and Wildlife Service was ordered by the 9th District Court of Appeals to reassess the status of the owl. As a result of the revised analysis, the service proposed the northern spotted owl for threatened status throughout its range. Because of the complex biological issues involved and the perceived potential for economic disruption in timber-dependent communities of the Pacific Northwest, this proposal generated more controversy and interest than any previous one. In this article I discuss the rationale for the service’s decision, public involvement in the process, and the mechanisms now available to conserve the northern spotted owl and its habitat under the Endangered Species Act.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Allen, H. L., K. Dixon, and K. L. Knutson. 1989. Cooperative administrative study to monitor spotted owl management areas in National Forests in Washington. Unpublished final report, Washington Department of Wildlife, Olympia, Washington.
Blakesley, J. A., A. B. Franklin, and R. J. Gutierrez. 1990. Spotted owl roost and nest site selection in northwest California. Unpublished manuscript, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California.
Carey, A. B., J. A. Reid, and S. P. Horton. 1990. Spotted owl home range and habitat use in southern Oregon Coast Ranges. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:11–17.
Dawson, W. R., J. D. Ligon, J. R. Murphy, J. P. Myers, D. Simberloff, and J. Verner. 1986. Report of the advisory panel on the spotted owl. Audubon Conservation Report No. 7. National Audubon Society.
Forsman, E. D. 1976. A preliminary investigation of the spotted owl in Oregon. Unpublished MS thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Forsman, E. D., E. C. Meslow, and H. M. Wight. 1984. Distribution and biology of the spotted owl in Oregon.Wildlife Monographs 87:1–64.
Forsman, E. D., and E. C. Meslow. 1985. Old-growth forest retention for spotted owls, how much to they need? Pages 58–59in R. J. Gutierrez and A. B. Carey (eds.), Ecology and management of the spotted owl in the Pacific Northwest. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. General Technical Report PNW-185.
Forsman, E. D., C. R. Bruce, M. A. Walter, and E. C. Meslow. 1987. A current assessment of the spotted owl population in Oregon.Murrelet 68:51–54.
Gould, G. I., Jr. 1974. The status of the spotted owl in California. California Department Fish and Game, Sacramento, California. Report No. 74-6.
Gould, G. I., Jr. 1975. Habitat requirements of the spotted owl in California. California/Nevada Wildlife Transactions 102–117.
Gould, G. I., Jr. 1979. Status and management of elf and spotted owls in California. Pages 86–97in P. P. Schaeffer, and S. M. Ehlers (eds.), Symposium on owls of the west, their ecology and conservation. National Audubon Society, Western Education Center, Tiburon, California.
Hamer, T. E. 1988. Home range size of the northern barred owl and northern spotted owl in western Washington. MS thesis. Western Washington University.
Hays, D. W., H. L. Allen, L. H. Egtvedt, and K. R. Dixon. 1989. Home range size and habitat use of spotted owls in Washington: preliminary report. Unpublished report. Washington Department Wildlife, Olympia, Washington.
Irwin, L. L., S. Self, and L. Smith. 1989. Status of the northern spotted owl on managed forestlands in northern California. Unpublished report. Timber Association of California, Sacramento, California.
Marcot, B. G., and J. Gardetto. 1980. Status of the spotted owl in Six Rivers National Forest, California.Western Birds 11:79–87.
Miller, G. S., and E. C. Meslow. 1989. The ecology of spotted owls in the central Cascades, western Oregon. Annual report. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
Morrison, P. H. 1988. Old growth in the Pacific Northwest: A status report. The Wilderness Society, Washington, DC.
Norse, E. A. 1988. Sustaining biological diversity and timber production in a changing world. Unpublished draft report. The Wilderness Society, Washington, DC.
Pious, M. 1989. The northern spotted owl in managed, second-growth coastal redwood forest, Mendocino County, California: Preliminary results. Unpublished report. Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Calpella, California.
Sisco, C., and R. Gutierrez. 1984. Winter ecology of radiotagged spotted owls on Six Rivers National Forest, Humboldt County, California. Unpublished report. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest, Eureka, California.
Solis, D. M. 1983. Summer habitat ecology of spotted owls in northwestern Washington. MS thesis. Humboldt State University, Arcata, California.
Spies, T. A., and J. F. Franklin. 1988. Old-growth and forest dynamics in the Douglas-fir region of western Oregon and Washington.Natural Areas Journal 8:190–201.
Thomas, J. W., E. D. Forsman, J. B. Lint, E. C. Meslow, B. R. Noon, and J. Verner. 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl. Interagency Scientific Committee. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior National Park Service, and United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
Thrailkill, J. A., and E. C. Meslow. 1989. Home range size and habitat utilization of northern spotted owls in the Wolf Creek Study Area, Eugene BLM District, Oregon. Unpublished progress report, 1 June 1987–1 September 1989. Oregon Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1986. Draft supplement to the environmental impact statement for an amendment to the Pacific Northwest Regional Guide, vols. 1 and 2. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Portland, Oregon.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1988. Final supplement to the environmental impact statement for an amendment to the Pacific Northwest Regional guide, Vols. 1 and 2. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Portland, Oregon.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 1989. Spotted owl inventory and monitoring. Unpublished fiscal year 89 annual report. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon.
USDI (United States Department of Interior). 1987. The northern spotted owl status review. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
USDI (United States Department of Interior). 1989. The northern spotted owl: A status review supplement. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
USDI (United States Department of Interior). 1990. The 1990 northern spotted owl status review. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
USDI (United States Department of Interior). 1992. Northern spotted owl recovery plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
USGAO (United States General Accounting Office). 1989. Spotted owl petition evaluation beset by problems. Report to Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment, Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franzreb, K.E. Perspectives on the landmark decision designating the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) as a threatened subspecies. Environmental Management 17, 445–452 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394660
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394660