Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnitude and distribution of option value for the Washakie Wilderness, northwest Wyoming, USA

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Option value is estimated for the Washakie Wilderness, northwest Wyoming, USA, using the contingent valuation technique. Consumer surplus, the traditional measure of economic value, is estimated separately and compared with option value. Several populations are tested, including Washakie visitors, Yellowstone National Park visitors, and residents from four metropolitan test markets: Salt Lake City, Utah; Portland, Oregon; Nashville, Tennessee; and Orlando, Florida, USA. The average annual preservation option value (consumer surplus) expressed by on-site wilderness visitors is $46.17 ($80.13), by urban residents is $9.70 ($8.97), and by rural residents is $8.43 ($7.80). Four selected attributes are determined to be important in motivating option demand for the Washakie, including existence value, bequest value, the desire for an on-site visit, and interest in securing the visiting privileges of others. The results suggest that option value is important in wilderness valuation and that off-site users account for a large part of the economic value of wilderness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, R. 1981. A note on option value and expected consumer's surplus.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. 1982. Option value: An exposition and extension.Land Economics 58:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., and C. Cicchetti. 1975. Some institutional and conceptual thoughts on the measurement of indirect and intangible benefits and costs.In H. Peskin and E. Seskin (eds.), Cost benefit analysis and water pollution policy. Washington Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., T. Heberlein, and M. Kealy. 1983. Contingent valuation of environmental assets: Comparisons with a simulated market.Natural Resources Journal 23:618–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. 1975. Option demand and consumer's surplus: Comment.American Economic Review 65:733–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, P. 1979. Estimating willingness to pay: Why and how?Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81:142–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K. 1989. Commodity specification and the framing of contingent-valuation questions.Land Economics 65:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D., and T. Crocker. 1981. The advantages of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis.Public Choice 36:235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookshire, D., L. Eubanks, and A. Randall. 1983. Estimating option prices and existence values for wildlife resources.Land Economics 59:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D. 1971. Option demand and consumer surplus: Comment.Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:523–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, C., and A. M. Freeman, III. 1971. Option demand and consumer surplus: Further comment.Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:528–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, M., and J. Knetsch. 1966. Economics of outdoor recreation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, W., V. K. Smith, and A. Fisher. 1987. Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the Monongahela River.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14:248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE/EIA. 1980. The use of federal lands for energy development. Energy policy study, Vol. 8:DOE/EIA-0201/8. US Department of Energy.

  • Edwards, S., and G. Anderson. 1987. Overlooked biases in contingent valuation surveys: Some considerations.Land Economics 63:168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., and J. Krutilla. 1972. Determination of optimal capacity of resource-based recreation facilities.In J. Krutilla (ed.), Natural environments—studies in theoretical and applied analysis. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A., III. 1984. The sign and size of option value.Land Economics 60:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A., III. 1985. Supply uncertainty, option price, and option value.Land Economics 61:176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, L., 1976. Wilderness as sacred space. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenley, D., R. Walsh, and R. Young. 1981. Option value: Empirical evidence from a case study of recreation and water quality.Quarterly Journal of Economics 96:658–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt, W., and D. Cole. 1987. Wildland Recreation: Ecology and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R., and M. Plummer, 1987. Option value under income and price uncertainty.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14:212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J., G. Stankey, and R. Lucas. 1978. Wilderness management. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1365. US Forest Service.

  • Henning, D. 1979. The politics of wilderness: Unique value conflicts.The Humanist 39:18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, D. 1987. Wilderness politics: Public participation and values.Environmental Management 11:283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, D., and W. Mangun. 1989. Managing the environmental crisis: Incorporating competing values in natural resource administration. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. 1974. Option values in the economics of irreplaceable assets. Review of economic studies. Symposium on the economics of exhaustible resources 1974. pp. 89–104.

  • Hutchison, R. 1988. A critique of race, ethnicity, and social class in recent leisure-recreation research.Journal of Leisure Research 20:10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubenville, A. 1971. A test of differences between wilderness recreation party leaders and party members.Journal of Leisure Research 3:116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. 1966. The tyranny of small decisions: Market failures, imperfections, and the limits of economics.Kyklos 19:23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, S. 1981. What price incentives? Auburn House, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J., and R. Davis. 1966. Comparison of methods for recreational evaluation.In A. V. Kneese and S. C. Smith (eds.), Water Research. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. 1967. Conservation reconsidered.The American Economic Review 57:777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J., and A. Fisher. 1975. The economics of natural environments. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. 1969. Option demand and consumer's surplus.Quarterly Journal of Economics 83:344–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. 1967. Collective-consumption services of individual-consumption goods: Comment.Quarterly Journal of Economics 81:351–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1983. Low and variable compliance rates at voluntary trail registers. Research Note INT-326. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1989. A look at wilderness use and users in transition.Natural Resources Journal 29:41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., and T. Kovalicky. 1981. Self-issued wilderness permits as a use measurement system. Research Paper INT-270. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., H. Schreuder, and G. James. 1971. Wilderness use estimation: a pilot test of sampling procedures on the Mission Mountains Primitive Area. US Forest Service Research Paper INT-109. Ogden, Utah.

  • Norgaard, R. 1975. Resource scarcity and new technology in US petroleum development.Natural Resources Journal 15:265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, C., M. Evans, and L. McDonald. 1988. Length-biased sampling in contingent valuation studies.Land Economics 64:367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, M. 1986. Supply uncertainty, option price, and option value.Land Economics 62:313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A., J. Hoehn, and D. Brookshire. 1983. Contingent valuation surveys for evaluating environmental assets.Natural Resources Journal 23:635–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III. 1985. Valuing wildlands.Environmental Ethics 7:23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, R., and L. Chestnut. 1983. Valuing environmental commodities: Revisited.Land Economics 59:405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. 1984. Energy exploration on wilderness: “Privatization” and public lands management.Land Economics 60:56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. 1972. Option demand and consumer's surplus: Valuing price changes under uncertainty.American Economic Review 62:813–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W., R. d'Arge, and D. Brookshire. 1981. Valuing environmental commodities: Some recent experiments.Land Economics 57:151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W., D. Brookshire, E. Walther, K. McFarland, M. Thayer, R. Whitworth, S. Ben-David, W. Malm, and J. Molenar. 1983. The economic benefits of preserving visibility in the national parklands of the southwest.Natural Resources Journal 23:149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seller, C., J. Stoll, and J. Chavas. 1985. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: A comparison of nonmarket techniques.Land Economics 61:156–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. 1983. Option value: A conceptual overview.Southern Economic Journal 49:654–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. 1984. A bound for option value.Land Economics 60:292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. 1985. Supply uncertainty, option price, and indirect benefit estimation.Land Economics 61:303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. 1972. A strategy for the definition and management of wilderness quality.In J. Krutilla (ed.), Natural environments—studies in theoretical and applied analysis. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R., and R. Walsh. 1985. Effect of distance on the preservation value of water quality.Land Economics 61:281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szorek, G., ed. 1979. A definitive guide to selecting test markets, Vol. II. Times Publishing Company, Eric, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, M. 1981. Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: Further evidence.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8:27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 1980. Census of population. Advance estimates of social, economic and housing characteristics. US Commerce Department, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 1982. Statistical abstract of the US 1982–83. US Commerce Department, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Forest Service. 1981. Oil and gas exploration and leasing within the Washakie Wilderness. USDA-FS-02-00-81-09 Rocky Mountain Region, Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Forest Service. 1987. Wilderness use for Colorado and Wyoming. Internal statistics, Rocky Mountain Region. US Forest Service.

  • Utter, J. 1983. Opinions of Montanans on wilderness and resource development.Journal of Forestry 81:435–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R., J. Loomis, and R. Gillman. 1984. Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness.Land Economics 60:14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washburne, R. 1978. Black under-participation in wildland recreation: Alternative explanations.Leisure Sciences 1:175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. 1964. Collective-consumption services of individual-consumption goods.Quarterly Journal of Economics 78:471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilman, E. 1987. A note on supply side option value.Land Economics 63:284–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 99775-0780, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA

    Kenneth A. Barrick

  2. Department of Geography Department of Economics, Southern Illinois University, 62901-4514, Carbondale, Illinois, USA

    Ronald I. Beazley

Authors
  1. Kenneth A. Barrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald I. Beazley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrick, K.A., Beazley, R.I. Magnitude and distribution of option value for the Washakie Wilderness, northwest Wyoming, USA. Environmental Management 14, 367–380 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394205

Key words

Search

Navigation