Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 799–807 | Cite as

Impact of riverine wetlands construction and operation on stream channel stability: Conceptual framework for geomorphic assessment

  • Bruce L. Rhoads
  • Michael V. Miller
Research

Abstract

Wetland conservation is a critical environmental management issue. An emerging approach to this issue involves the construction of wetland environments. Because our understanding of wetlands function is incomplete and such projects must be monitored closely because they may have unanticipated impacts on ecological, hydrological, and geomorphological systems. Assessment of project-related impacts on stream channel stability is an important component of riverine wetlands construction and operation because enhanced erosion or deposition associated with unstable rivers can lead to loss of property, reductions in channel capacity, and degradation of water quality, aquatic habitat, and riparian aesthetics.

The water/sediment budget concept provides a scientific framework for evaluating the impact of riverine wetlands construction and operation on stream channel stability. This concept is based on the principle of conservation of mass, i.e., the total amount of water and sediment moving through a specific reach of river must be conserved. Long-term measurements of channel sediment storage and other water/sediment budget components provide the basis for distinguishing between project-related impacts and those resulting from other causes. Changes in channel sediment storage that occur as a result of changes in internal inputs of water or sediment signal a project-related impact, whereas those associated with changes in upstream or tributary inputs denote a change in environmental conditions elsewhere in the watershed. A geomorphic assessment program based on the water/sediment budget concept has been implemented at the site of the Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Projection near Chicago, Illinois, USA. Channel sediment storage changed little during the initial construction phase, suggesting that thus far the project has not affected stream channel stability.

Key words

Constructed wetlands Fluvial geomorphology Water/sediment budget 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barnard, R. S., and W. N. Melhorn. 1982. Morphologic and morphometric response to channelization: the case of Big Pine Creek Ditch, Benton County, Indiana. Pages 224–239in R. G. Craig and J. L. Craft (eds.), Applied geomorphology. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  2. Blalock, H. M. 1979. Social statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brice, J. C. 1982. Stream channel stability assessment. Report FHWA/RD-82/021. Federal Highway Administration. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  4. Brookes, A. 1987. River channel adjustments downstream from channelization works in England and Wales.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 12:337–351.Google Scholar
  5. Brookes, R. P., D. E. Samuel, and J. B. Hill (Eds.). 1985. Wetlands and water management on mined lands. Pennsylvania State University Press, College Park, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  6. Burkham, D. E. 1970. Depletion of streamflow by infiltration in the main channels of the Tucson Basin, southeastern Arizona. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-J. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Cairns, J. Jr. 1988. Restoration ecology: the new frontier. Pages 1–11in J. Cairns, Jr. (ed.), Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems, Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, H. H. 1988. Fluvial processes in river engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Coats, R., Swanson, M., and Williams, P. 1989. Hydrologic analysis for coastal wetland restoration.Environmental Management 13:715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Culler, R. C., R. C. Hanson, R. M. Myrick, R. M. Turner, and F. P. Kipple. 1982. Evapotranspiration before and after clearing phreatophytes, Gila River flood plain, Graham County, Arizona. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-P. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson, R. 1987. Hydraulic and sedimentary controls of channel pattern. Pages 129–158in K. S. Richards (ed.), River channels: environment and process. Basil Blackwell, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Graf, W. L. 1988. Fluvial processes in dryland rivers. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Gupta, A., and H. Fox. 1974. Effects of high-magnitude floods on stream channel form: a case study in Maryland Piedmont.Water Resources Research 10:499–509.Google Scholar
  14. Hey, D. L., J. M. Stockdale, D. Kropp, and G. Wilhelm. 1982. Creation of wetlands habitat in northeastern Illinois. Document 82/09. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
  15. Hirsch, A. 1988. Regulatory context for cumulative impact research.Environmental Management 12:715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooke, J. M. 1980. Magnitude and distribution of rates of river bank erosion.Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 5:143–157.Google Scholar
  17. Hooke, J. M. 1986. Applicable and applied geomorphology of rivers.Geography 71:1–13.Google Scholar
  18. Knighton, D. 1984. Fluvial forms and processes. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  19. Knox, J. C. 1972. Valley alluviation in south-western Wisconsin.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 62:401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knox, J. C. 1987. Stratigraphic evidence of large floods in the upper Mississippi Valley. Pages 155–180in L. Mayer and D. Nash (eds.), Catastrophic flooding. Allen and Unwin, Winchester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  21. Leopold, L. B., and M. G. Wolman. 1957. River channel patterns—braided, meandering and straight. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 282B. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. McKenna, D. P., J. R. Miller, and R. C. Berg. 1985. Geology. Pages 5-1–5-17in The Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project, Vol II, baseline survey (D. L. Hey and N. S. Philippi (eds.)). Wetlands Research, Inc., Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  23. Nunnally, N. R. 1985. Application of fluvial relationships to planning and design of channel modifications.Environmental Management 9:417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, C. C. 1981. Man, river systems and environmental impacts.Progress in Physical Geography 5:1–31.Google Scholar
  25. Parker, G., and D. Andres. 1976. Detrimental effects of river channelization. Pages 1248–1266in Rivers '76. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Petts, G. 1979. Complex response of river channel morphology subsequent to reservoir construction.Progress in Physical Geography 3:329–362.Google Scholar
  27. Petts, G., and I. Foster. 1985. Rivers and landscape. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  28. Richards, K. S. 1982. Rivers: form and process in alluvial channels. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  29. Schumm, S. A. 1969. River metamorphosis.Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE 95(HY1):255–273.Google Scholar
  30. Schumm, S. A., M. P. Mosley, and W. E. Weaver. 1987. Experimental fluvial geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Tiner, R. W. Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. US Fish and Wildlife Service. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, C. S. 1988. Techniques for the creation of wetland habitat in coal slurry ponds. Pages 91–114in J. Cairns, Jr. (ed), Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems, Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  33. US Army Corps of Engineers. 1986. Fact sheet: Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project. US Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District.Google Scholar
  34. Wilhelm, G. 1985. Vegetation. Pages 7-1–7-12in The Des Plaines River Wetlands Demonstration Project, Vol II, baseline data. Wetlands Research, Inc., Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  35. Williams, G. P. 1978. Bankfull discharge of rivers.Water Resources Research 14:1141–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce L. Rhoads
    • 1
  • Michael V. Miller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Illinois State Geological SurveyChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations