Skip to main content

Private land management for biodiversity conservation

Abstract

As human influences fragment native communities and ecosystems, remaining land must be better managed to conserve many elements of biodiversity. Much of this land is privately held, yet traditional private land-use management practices often further diminish biodiversity by promoting favored or edge-adapted species.

Today, private land stewards are increasingly aware of and concerned about biodiversity, but little guidance exists for them to make land-use decisions incorporating principles and knowledge from conservation biology. Consequently, most management strategies are highly subjective. This article addresses that problem by introducing current conservation wisdom to management and use of private lands. The result is a model program for developing land management plans, with the goal of maintaining viable populations and natural distributions of native species and communities from a landscape perspective.

The program establishes a protocol for classifying sites according to the importance of their species, communities, and other elements to global and regional biodiversity. These site classifications are based on the management objectives necessary to maintain important elements. Once managers classify a site, the program provides management standards, general stewardship principles, examples of land management strategies, and basic monitoring and evaluation procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature

  • Bean, M. J. 1983. The evolution of national wildlife law: Praeger, New York, 448 pp.

  • Brittingham, M. C., and S. A. Temple. 1983. Have cowbirds caused forest songbirds to decline?BioScience 33:31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeographic theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 211 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1980. World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development: IUCN, United Nations Environment Programme, World Wildlife Fund. Gland and Nairobi.

  • Jackson, J. A. 1986. Biopolitics, management of federal lands, and the conservation of the red-cockaded woodpecker.American Birds 40(5):1162–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. R., III, R. L. Peters, and E. B. Allen. 1988. Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity.Environmental Management 12(1):55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1933. Game management. Charles Scribners, New York, 481 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. T. 1982. Living in the environment. Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 641 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N. 1987. Tropical forests and their species: going, going ...? Pages 21–27in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity.BioScience 33(11):700–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach.Conservation Biology 4:355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., and L. D. Harris. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales.Environmental Management 10:299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NWPF (National Wetlands Policy Forum). 1988. Protecting America's wetlands: An action agenda. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment). 1987. Technologies to maintain biological diversity. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 334 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S., C. H. McLellan, and A. P. Dobson 1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone, Pages 233–256in M. E. Soulé (ed.), Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. O. 1988. The current state of biological diversity, Pages 3–20in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Connell, M.A., Noss, R.F. Private land management for biodiversity conservation. Environmental Management 16, 435–450 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394120

Key words

  • Biodiversity
  • Land management
  • Conservation
  • Monitoring