Skip to main content

Trends and patterns in section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA

Abstract

The effects of permitting decisions made under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for which compensatory mitigation was required were examined. Information was compiled on permits issued in Oregon (January 1977–January 1987) and Washington (1980–1986). Data on the type of project permitted, wetland impacted, and mitigation project were collected and analyzed. The records of the Portland and Seattle District Offices of the US Army Corps of Engineers and of Environmental Protection Agency Region X were the primary sources of information.

The 58 permits issued during the years of concern in Oregon document impacts to 82 wetlands and the creation of 80. The total area of wetland impacted was 74 ha while 42 ha were created, resulting in a net loss of 32 ha or 43%. The 35 permits issued in Washington document impacts to 72 wetlands and the creation of 52. The total area of wetland impacted was 61 ha while 45 ha were created, resulting in a net loss of 16 ha or 26%. In both states, the number of permits requiring compensation increased with time. The area of the impacted and created wetlands tended to be ≤0.40 ha. Permitted activity occurred primarily west of the Cascade Mountains and in the vicinity of urban centers. Estuarine and palustrine wetlands were impacted and created most frequently. The wetland types created most often were not always the same as those impacted; therefore, local gains and losses of certain types occurred. In both states the greatest net loss in area was in freshwater marshes.

This study illustrates how Section 404 permit data might be used in managing a regional wetland resource. However, because the data readily available were either incomplete or of poor quality, the process of gathering information was very labor intensive. Since similar analyses would be useful to resource managers and scientists from other areas, development of an up-to-date standardized data base is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature Cited

  • Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-79/31, 103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feierabend, J. S., and J. M. Zelazny. 1987. Status report on our nation's wetlands. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, 46 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman Environmental Services. 1987. Estuarine mitigation evaluation project: Final report. Internal Report: Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development and Division of State Lands.

  • Frayer, W. E., T. J. Monahon, D. C. Bowden, and F. A. Graybill. 1983. Status and trends of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950's to 1970's. Department of Forest and Wood Science, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. W. 1987. Mitigating estuarine development impacts in the Pacific Northwest.Northwest Environmental Journal 3(1):93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindall, W. N., Jr., and G. W. Thayer. 1982. Quantification of National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts in the southeast region of the United States.Marine Fisheries Review 44:18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, A., Jr., and R. Ruebsamen. 1988. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts in the southeastern United States for 1987.Marine Fisheries Review 50:43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, A., Jr., and G. W. Thayer. 1986. National Marine Fisheries Service habitat conservation efforts in the southeast region of the United States from 1981–1985.Marine Fisheries Review 48:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment. 1984. Wetlands: Their use and regulation. GPO Stock No. 052-003-00944-7. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 208 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarterman, P. J. 1985. Oregon's estuarine mitigation policy.National Wetlands Newsletter 7(6):8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockton, M. B., and C. J. Richardson. 1987. Wetland development trends in coastal North Carolina, USA, from 1970 to 1984.Environmental Management 11:649–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: Current status and recent trends. US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, DC, 55 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B., and M. E. Kentula. 1986. Wetlands research plan. EPA/600/3-86/009. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. NTIS Access. # PB86 158 656/AS, 118 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kentula, M.E., Sifneos, J.C., Good, J.W. et al. Trends and patterns in section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA. Environmental Management 16, 109–119 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393913

Key words

  • Wetlands
  • Clean Water Act
  • Mitigation
  • Wetland creation
  • Pacific Northwest
  • Washington
  • Oregon