Abstract
Two frequent beliefs about rural environmental attitudes are examined conceptually and empirically: (1) the common conception that rural environmental concerns are expressed predominantly by wealthy community newcomers; and (2) the related position that long-time rural residents are hostile to the environmental cause.
We argue conceptually, through the use of a 2×2 community matrix, that environmental attitudes are equally likely to be expressed by what we term “upper middle income newcomers,” “lower middle income newcomers,” “upper middle income locals,” and “lower middle income locals.” Empirically, we find that although wealthy newcomers express the strongest environmental attitudes in the community, their concerns represent only a small percentage of rural environmental attitudes consisting of respondents who make less than $40,000 a year in household income are over 40 years of age, possess less than a college education, and work in a nonprofessional occupation. This new category expresses environmental concerns at least equal to the rest of the community on three of four measures of environmental attitudes.
The findings provide insight into the widespread and cross-sectional nature of rural environmental concern. The implication is that environmental groups will find significant sources of political support in rural communities, provided they craft their environmental message in a language consistent with rural attitudes and values.
Things are gettin' bad fast. Easterners and environmentalists comin' down here from the big cities are tryin' to turn our way of life completely upside down.
A western US rancher quoted in Krakauer (1991)
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Babbie, E. 1986. The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, California, 577 pp.
Blocker, T. J., and D. L. Eckberg. 1989. Environmental issues as women's issues: general concerns and local hazards.Social Science Quarterly 70:586–593.
Buttel, F. H., and W. L. Flinn. 1977. Conceptions of rural life and environmental concern.Rural Sociology 42(4):544–555.
Chambers, R. E., and M. K. McBeth. 1992. Community encouragement: returning to the original basis of community development.Journal of the Community Development Society 23(1):20–38.
Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley, New York, 325 pp.
Durkheim, E. 1893/1964. The division of labor in society. Free Press, New York, 439 pp.
Flora, C. B., J. L. Flora, J. D. Spears, and L. Swanson 1992. Rural communities: Legacy and change. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 334 pp.
Fortmann, L., and J. Kusel. 1990. New voices, old beliefs: Forest environmentalism among new and long-standing rural residents.Rural Sociology 55(2):214–232.
Foster, R. H. 1991. The federal government and the West, Pages 77–102in C. Thomas (ed.), Politics and public policy in the contemporary American West. University of New Mexico Press, 589 pp.
Hamilton, L. C. 1985. Concern about toxic wastes: Three demographic predictors.Sociological Perspectives 28:463–486.
Hueber, G. 1992. Americans report high levels of environmental concern, activity.The Gallup Poll Monthly April:6–11.
Jones, R. E., and R. E. Dunlap. 1992. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology 57(1):28–47.
Krakauer, J. 1991. Brown-fellas.Outside December:69–72, 114–116.
Merton, R. K. 1957. Social theory and social structure. Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 645 pp.
Mohai, P., and B. W. Twight. 1987. Age and environmentalism: An elaboration of the Buttel Model using national survey evidence.Social Science Quarterly 68(4):798–815.
Morrison, D. E., and R. E. Dunlap. 1986. Environmentalism and elitism.Environmental Management 10(5):581–589.
Ott, L., W. Mendenhall, and R. F. Larson. 1978. Statistics: A tool for the social sciences. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA, 531 pp.
Rank, M. R., and P. R. Voss. 1982. Patterns of rural community involvement: A comparison of residents and recent migrants.Rural Sociology 47(2):197–219.
Rudzitis, G., and H. E. Johansen. 1991. How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey.Environmental Management 15(2):227–233.
Stephenson, J. B. 1968. Shiloh: A mountain community. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, 232 pp.
Stern, P. C. 1992. Psychological dimensions of global environmental change.Annual Review of Psychology 43:269–302.
Toennies, F. (trans. by C. P. Loomis). 1887/1963. Community and society. Harper Torchbook, New York, 257 pp.
Tremblay, K. R., and R. E. Dunlap. 1978. Rural-urban residence and concern with environmental quality replication and extension.Rural Sociology 43:474–491.
Van Liere, K. D., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181–197.
Willits, F. K., R. C. Bealer, and V. L. Timbers. 1990. Popular images of “rurality”: Data from a Pennsylvania survey.Rural Sociology 55(4):559–578.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McBeth, M.K., Foster, R.H. Rural environmental attitudes. Environmental Management 18, 401–411 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393869
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393869