Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperation or conflict? Interagency relationships and the future of biodiversity for US parks and forests

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cooperation between the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service and the United States Department of Interior (USDI) National Park Service is most often advocated to protect biological diversity on national forests and parks, but the agencies, so far, have done little to implement the biodiversity mandates of such laws as the Endangered Species Act and the National Forest Management Act. The ideological and political history of the Forest Service and Park Service is explored to determine the roots of interagency conflicts. Several recent models of cooperative reform are also critiqued and found to be insufficient to stimulate better working relationships. To protect biodiversity, cooperation must be framed within conservation biology and must place primary emphasis on ecosystem patterns and processes as well as on individual species. Increased education of agency managers, ecosystem-level research, local and regional public participation, scientific oversight committees, new legislation, and enlightened leadership also play important roles. Ultimately, management policies must be reframed within a context of ecocentric values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Agee, J. K., and D. K. Johnson (eds.). 1988. Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. 237 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allin, C. W. 1982. The politics of wilderness preservation. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut. 304 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allin, C. W. 1987. Wilderness preservation as a bureaucratic tool. Pages 127–138in P. O. Foss (ed.), Federal lands policy. Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. J., and C. M. Schonewald-Cox. 1987. Management strategies for improving population viability. Pages 73–87in B. A. Wilcox, P. F. Brussard, and B. G. Marcot (eds.), The management of viable populations: theory, applications, and case studies. Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. 1989.Forest Watch 10(1): special edition on forest planning.

  • Christensen, N. L. 1988. Succession and natural disturbance: paradigms, problems, and preservation of natural ecosystems. Pages 62–87in J. Agee and D. Johnson (eds.), Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W. 1988. The identity and images of wildlife professionals.Renewable Resources Journal 6(3):12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W., and A. H. Harvey. 1988. Management of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: an annotated bibliography. Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative, Jackson, Wyoming. 51 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. W., and S. R. Kellert. 1988. Toward a policy paradigm of the wildlife sciences.Renewable Resources Journal 6(1):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. N., and D. McCool. 1985. Staking out the terrain. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York. 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Research Service. 1987. Greater Yellowstone ecosystem: an analysis of data submitted by federal and state agencies. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 210 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumpacker, D. W., S. W. Hodge, D. Friedley, and W. P. Gregg, Jr. 1988. A preliminary assessment of the status of major terrestrial and wetland ecosystems on federal and Indian lands in the United States.Conservation Biology 2:103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culhane, P. J. 1981. Public lands politics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland. 398 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, S. T., and S. Fairfax, 1979. Forest and range policy. McGraw-Hill, New York, 455 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. E. 1989. Design of a long-term ecological monitoring program for Channel Islands National Park, California.Natural Areas Journal 9(2):80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, W. R., J. D. Ligon, J. R. Murphy, J. P. Myers, D. Simberloff, and J. Verner. 1987. Report of the scientific advisory panel on the spotted owl.Condor 89:205–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, D. S. 1989. Alternative silvicultural systems—west: a perspective from the Douglas-fir region. Paper presented at the National Silviculture Workshop, USDA Forest Service, Petersburg, Arkansas, July 10–13, 1989. 10 pp.

  • DeBonis, J. (ed.). 1989. Inner voice 1(1). Association of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, Eugene, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devall, B. 1990. Deep ecology and radical environmentalism. Paper read at the 1990 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, New Orleans, Louisiana. 34 pp.

  • Devall, B., and G. Sessions. 1985. Deep ecology. Peregrine Smith, Salt Lake, Utah. 266 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M. I., and M. M. Holland. 1988. UNESCO's man and the biosphere program.BioScience 38:635–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, D., and H. Wolke, 1989. The big outside. Ned Ludd Books, Tucson, Arizona. 470 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresta, R. A. 1984. America's national parks and their keepers. Resources For the Future, Washington, DC. 382 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, W. 1989. The deep ecology—ecofeminism debate and its parallels.Environmental Ethics 11:5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F. 1977. The biosphere reserve program in the United States.Science 195:262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F. 1989. Old-growth: the contribution to commercial forests.Forest Planning Canada 5(3):17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., and R. T. Forman. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles.Landscape Ecology 1:5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., T. Spies, D. Perry, M. Harmon, and A. McKee. 1986. Modifying Douglas-fir management regimes for nontimber objectives. Pages 373–379in C. D. Oliver, and J. A. Johnson (eds.), Douglas-fir: stand management for the future. University of Washington College of Forest Resources, Institute of Forest Resources Contribution 55. Seattle, Washington. 388 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, K. E. 1987. Endangered species: Where to go from here?American Forests 93:57–60, 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (ed.). 1988. Forever wild: conserving the Greater North Cascades Ecosystem. Mountain Hemlock Press, Bellingham, Washington. 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1990. Northwest forest landscapes: A conservation strategy.Northwest Environmental Journal (in press).

  • Gilbert, V. C. 1988. Cooperation is ecosystem management. Pages 180–192in J. K. Agee and D. R. Johnson (eds.), Ecosystem management for parks and wilderness. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E. 1987. Spatial structure and population vulnerability. Pages 125–141in M. E. Soule (ed.), Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. 1988. Ecosystem management for native diversity: how to save the national parks and forests.The Trumpeter 5(2):47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. 1990a. Viable populations, reserve size, and federal lands management: a critique.Conservation Biology 4(2):127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. 1990b. Protecting biological diversity through the greater ecosystem concept: applications and implications.Natural Areas Journal (in press).

  • Hales, D. 1989. Changing concepts of national parks. Pages 139–145in D. Western and M. C. Pearl (eds.), Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 224 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D., and P. B. Gallagher. 1989. New initiatives for wildlife conservation: the need for movement corridors. Pages 11–34in In defense of wildlife: preserving communities and corridors. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. 1959. Conservation and the gospel of efficiency. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 297 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, R. L., S. Peel, and P. B. Landres, 1987. A critical evaluation of the species approach to biological conservation.Endangered Species Update 4:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, B. 1986. Representation and participation in the democratic governance of science and technology. Pages 223–243in M. L. Goggin (ed.), Governing science and technology in a democracy. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiter, R. 1989. Taking account of the ecosystem on the public domain: law and ecology in the Greater Yellowstone Region.University of Colorado Law Review 60(4):923–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppes, C. R. 1987. Efficiency/equity/esthetics: towards a reinterpretation of American conservation.Environmental Review 11(2):127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County almanac. Oxford, New York. 228 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. 1981. The fallacy of wildlife conservation. McClelland and Stewart, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G. E., and D. L. Tichnell. 1985. The state of the world's parks. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser, C. 1988. The redesigned forest. R. and E. Miles, San Pedro, California. 234 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely, J. A. 1989. Protected areas and human ecology: how national parks can contribute to sustaining societies. Pages 150–158in D. Western and M. C. Pearl (eds.), Conservation for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. 1986. Intrinsic value: Will the defenders of nature please rise? Pages 504–515in M. E. Soule (ed.), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. 1989. The rights of nature. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. 290 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, W. D. 1985. Legal and biologic boundaries of western North American national parks: a problem of congruence.Biological Conservation 33:197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norse, E. A. 1990. Ancient forests of the Pacific Northwest. Island Press, Washington, DC. 327 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1987a. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at The Nature Conservancy (USA).Biological Conservation 41:11–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1987b. Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes.Natural Areas Journal 7:2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1989. Who will speak for biodiversity?Conservation Biology 3:202–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1990a. Issues of scale in conservation biology.In P. L. Fiedler and S. K. Jain (eds.), The theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1990b. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach.Conservation Biology (in press).

  • Noss, R. F., and L. D. Harris. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: preserving diversity at all scales.Environmental Management 10:299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophuls, W. 1977. Ecology and the politics of scarcity. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, California. 303 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. L., and J. D. S. Darling. 1985. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves.BioScience 35:707–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., and J. N. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves.Biological Conservation 13:27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, M. M., and S. D. Gehman. 1987. A common sense approach to grizzly bear habitat evaluation.Forest Watch 8:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, G. S., D. K. Dawson, and B. A. Dowell. 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states.Wildlife Monographs 103:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. 1989. Pollution shrouding national parks.New York Times, December 3, 1989. p. 19.

  • Rourke, F. 1976. Bureaucracy, politics, and public policy. Little, Brown, Boston, Massachusetts. 173 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, L. F., K. B. Aubrey, R. S. Holthausen, J. W. Thomas, B. G. Marcot, and E. C. Meslow. 1988. Ecological dependency: the concept and its implications for research and management.Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 53:115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runte, A. 1987. National parks: the American experience. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska. 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser, H., C. Schonewald-Cox, and R. Baker. 1987. The role of interagency cooperation in managing for viable populations. Pages 159–175in M. E. Soule (ed.), Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, J. L., and R. B. Keiter, 1987. Glacier National Park and its neighbors: a study of federal interagency relations.Ecology Law Quarterly 14:207–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox, C. M. 1983. Conclusions: guidelines to management: a beginning attempt. Pages 141–145in C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W. L. Thomas (eds.), Genetics and conservation: a reference for managing wild plant and animal populations. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. M., B. Csuti, K. Smith, J. E. Estes, and S. Caicco. 1988. Beyond endangered species: an integrated strategy for the preservation of biological diversity.Endangered Species Update 5:43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, G. 1990. Ecocentrism and global ecosystem protection. 50p.in M. Oelschaeger (ed.), The wilderness condition: Essays on environment and civilization. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M. 1987. Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty. Pages 69–87in M. E. Soule, (ed.), Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1987. The spotted owl fracas: Mixing academic, applied, and political ecology.Ecology 68:766–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E., and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?Biological Conservation 35:19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G. H., D. N. Cole, R. C. Lucas, M. E. Peterson, and S. S. Frissell. 1984. The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Experiment Station General Technical Report INT-176, Ogden, Utah.

  • Steen, H. K. 1976. The US Forest Service: a history. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. 356 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W., and H. Salwasser. 1989. Bringing conservation biology into a position of influence in natural resource management.Conservation Biology 3:123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 1987. Proposed land and resource management plan, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. USDA Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington, 158 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI. 1985. Report of the subgroup of the park protection working group. June 12. USDI, Washington, DC, 5 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. Endangered species statistics.Endangered Species Update 6(10):20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDI Park Service. 1988. General management plan, North Cascades National Park. USDI Pacific Northwest Region, Seattle, Washington. 77 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tighem, K. V. 1986. Have our national parks failed us?Park News 15:31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P., P. Ehrlich, A. Ehrlich, and P. Matson. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis.BioScience 36(6):368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, D. M. 1988. Sharing responsibility for conserving diversity: the complementary roles of conservation biologists and public land agencies.Conservation Biology 2:398–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolke, H. 1989. An eclectic path from the NFMA quagmire.Forest Walch 19(1):36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslowsky, D. 1986. These American lands. Henry Holt, New York. 404 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sierra Institute U.C. Extension, 740 Front Street, 95060, Santa Cruz, California, USA

    R. Edward Grumbine

Authors
  1. R. Edward Grumbine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grumbine, R.E. Cooperation or conflict? Interagency relationships and the future of biodiversity for US parks and forests. Environmental Management 15, 27–37 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393836

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393836

Key words

Search

Navigation