Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling wilderness campsites: Factors that influence amount of impact

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A standard campsite model is proposed and then manipulated to examine the influence of individual variables on amount of vegetation loss. Amount of impact is influenced by amount of use, vegetation fragility, vegetation density, and the degree to which activities are concentrated spatially on the site. Degree of concentration also influences the importance of the other explanatory variables. Amount of use and vegetation fragility are equally important determinants of impact and are most influential where activity concentration is low. The curvilinear relationship between amount of use and amount of impact can be explained by the tendency for activities to become increasingly concentrated as amount of use increases. This relationship should not vary with regional or environmental characteristics except where these influence degree of activity concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Cole, D. N. 1982. Wilderness campsite impacts effect of amount of use. USDA Forest Service Research Papert INT-284. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1983. Campsite conditions in the Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-312. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1987a. Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: A state-of-knowledge review. Pages 135–177in R. C. Lucas (comp.), Proceedings, national wilderness research conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220. Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1987b. Effects of three seasons of experimental trampling on five montane forest communities and a grassland in western Montana, USA.Biological Conservation 40:219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1989. Area of vegetation loss: A new index of campsite impact. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-389. Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah, 5 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N., and J. L. Marion. 1988. Recreation impacts in some riparian forests of the eastern United States.Environmental Management 12:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, S. S., Jr., and D. P. Duncan. 1965. Campsite preference and deterioration in the Quetico-Superior canoe country.Journal of Forestry 65:256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, H. W. 1959. Soil compaction on forest and range lands. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 768. Washington, DC, 33 pp.

  • Montgomery, P. H., and F. C. Edminster. 1966. Use of soil surveys in planning for recreation. Pages 104–112in L. J. Bartelli (ed.), Soil surveys and land use planning. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, D.N. Modeling wilderness campsites: Factors that influence amount of impact. Environmental Management 16, 255–264 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393831

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393831

Key words

Navigation