Abstract
Visitor satisfaction has been a consistently stated goal of outdoor recreation management. Recreation resource managers provide opportunities for the visiting public with the anticipation of satisfying the needs of the visitors. Management efforts are often evaluated in terms of visitor satisfaction. In the recent decade, a multiple satisfactions approach has been the primary research paradigm guiding visitor satisfaction research. This paradigm has focused primarily upon behavioral-type dimensions such as crowding, goal attainment, and resource impacts resulting from behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of a setting dimension relative to behavioral-type dimensions for explaining differences in visitor satisfaction. A sample of 895 river visitors were sent a questionnaire in the mail; 682 were returned for a 76.2% response rate. Regression analysis indicated the setting dimension was ranked as one of the most important dimensions for explaining differences in visitor satisfaction. Other dimensions considered included group behavior, perceived crowding, parking, past experience, encounters, use levels, and time waiting. Implications for management are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Ditton, R. B., A. R. Graefe, and A. J. Fedler. 1981. Recreational satisfaction at Buffalo National River: Some measurement concerns. Pages 9–17in Some recent products of river recreation research. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-63, St Paul, Minnesota.
Hammitt, W. E., C. D. McDonald, and M. Patterson. 1990. Determinants of multiple satisfaction for deer hunting.Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:331–337.
Heberlein, T. A., and B. Shelby. 1977. Carrying capacity, values and the satisfaction model: A reply to Greist.Journal of Leisure Research 9(2):142–148.
LaPage, W. 1983. Recreation resource management for visitor satisfaction. Pages 281–285.In Lieber and Fesenmaler (eds.), Recreation planning and management. Venture Publishing, State College, Pennsylvania.
Lee, R. G. 1975. The management of human components in the Yosemite National Park ecosystem: Final research report. University of California, Berkeley, California.
Manning, R. E. 1986. Studies in outdoor recreation. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon.
Probst, D. B., and D. W. Lime. 1982. How satisfying is satisfaction research? Pages 124–133in Forest and river recreation: Research update. University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Misc. Publication 18.
Schreyer, R., D. W. Lime, and D. R. Williams. 1984. Characterizing the influence of past experience on recreation behavior.Journal of Leisure Research 16(1):34–50.
Shelby, B. 1980. Crowding models for backcountry recreation.Land Economics 56(1):43–55.
Vaske, J. J., A. J. Fedler, and A. R. Graefe. 1986. Multiple determinants of satisfaction from a specific waterfowl hunting trip.Leisure Sciences 8(2):149–166.
Williams, D. R. 1988. Great expectations and the limits to satisfaction: A review of recreation and consumer satisfaction research. Pages 422–438.In Outdoor recreation benchmark: Proceedings of the national outdoor recreation forum. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, General Technical Report SE-52. Asheville, North Carolina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrick, T.A., McDonald, C.D. Factors affecting overall satisfaction with a river recreation experience. Environmental Management 16, 243–247 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393829
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393829