Skip to main content
Log in

Change in a petrified forest and implications towards management

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Gallatin Petrified Forest of Montana, USA, is a unique resource. The extensive area of the fossil forests, the numerous petrified trees in upright positions, and the large number of vertical layers of “successive” forests are unparalleled in the world. Collection by permit is permitted, but damage to the petrified forest by indiscriminate collection occurs. To assess the impact, a comparative examination of replicate (over 13 yr) photography of selected specimens was undertaken. The amount of change over time, the possible cause of change, and the relationship of the location of the specimen to that amount of change were determined. It was found that although considerable loss continues, impacts prior to a 1973 collection policy were most severe. There was more loss by natural erosion than by collection, but the collections are additive to the natural changes. Size of petrified outcrops and the steepness of the slope on which they were found did correlate with the amount of natural change occurring over time. Human-induced change was associated with the distance of the outcrops from the main trailheads and the specimen size. This method provides a tool with which to monitor impacts and develop a future policy aimed towards conservation of a unique resource in light of the need for appreciative recreation and some specimen collection. Recommended changes in present management policy are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Chapman, W., and L. Chapman. 1935. The petrified forest.Natural History 35:382–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, E. 1964a. The petrified forests of Yellowstone Park.Scientific American 210:105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, E. 1964b. Petrified forests of Yellowstone National Park. National Park Service. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, E. 1980. Petrified forests of Yellowstone National Park. National Park Service. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, L. H. 1976. The Gallatin “petrified forest”: A review. Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Special Publication 73, The Tobacco Root Geological Society 1976 Field Conference Guidebook, Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology, Butte, Montana.

  • Knowlton, F. H. 1899. Fossil flora of the Yellowstone National Park.US Geological Survey Monograph 32:651–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritland, J. H. 1968. Fossil forest of the Specimen Creek area, Yellowstone National Park, Montana. Unpublished MA thesis. Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan.

  • Sanborn, W. B. 1951. Groves of stone: Fossil forest of the Yellowstone region.Pacific Discovery 4:18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service. 1981. Average annual precipitation, Montana. US Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollid, S. A. 1973. Surficial geology of the Porcupine drainage basin, Gallatin County, southwestern Montana. Unpublished MS thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Forest Service. 1973. Gallatin petrified forest special management zone permit and regulations. US Department of Agriculture, Bozeman, Montana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, J. R. 1990. Change assessment of the Gallatin petrified forest, Montana. Unpublished MS thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 103 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilbur, J., Hansen, K. Change in a petrified forest and implications towards management. Environmental Management 16, 179–186 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393823

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393823

Key words

Navigation