Skip to main content
Log in

Information as a management tool: An evaluation of the Pemigewasset Wilderness management plan

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The newly instituted management plan for the Pemigewasset Wilderness area of New Hampshire, USA, which relies principally on providing information to visitors, represents a departure from traditional plans. Logit analysis of survey data indicates limited evidence of the plan having much direct impact on visitor behavior. There is evidence of success in information dissemination to area users; however, the type of information that is being relayed to backcountry users does not appear to be that which the management plan is attempting to promote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bradley, J. 1979. A human approach to reducing wildland impact.In R. Ittner, D. Potter, J. Agee, and S. Anschell (eds.), Proceedings, recreational impact on wildlands. USDA-Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, O., and R. A. Kramer. 1985. Analysis of food stamp participation using qualitative choice models.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(1):49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. 1989. Low impact practices for wilderness use. General Technical Report INT-000. USDA-Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D., and J. Marion. 1988. Recreational impacts in some riparian forests of the eastern United States.Environmental Management 12:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echelberger, H. E., and S. Moeller. 1977. Use and users of the Cranberry Backcountry in West Virginia: Insights for eastern backcountry management. Research paper NE-363. USDA Forest Service, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, J. R. 1979. Agency literature as an aid to wilderness management.Journal of Forestry 77(2):97–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO (General Accounting Office). 1989. Wilderness preservation: Problems in some national forests should be addressed. RCED-89-202. Washington, DC, 91 pp.

  • Greenleaf, R. D., H. E. Echelberger, and R. E. Leonard. 1984. Backpacker satisfaction, expectations, and use levels in an eastern forest setting.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 2(3):49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, B., and D. Cole. 1988. Soft paths: A guide to tomorrow's wilderness. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendee, J. C., W. R. Catton, C. D. Marlow, and C. F. Brockman. 1968. Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest: Their characteristics, values, and management preferences. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-61.

  • Hendee, J. C., J. H. Stankey, and R. C. Lucas. 1978. Wilderness management. USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication 1365. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumpe, E. E., and P. J. Brown. 1982. Redistributing back-country use through information related to recreation experiences.Journal of Leisure Research 80(6):360–362, 364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R., H. Echelberger, and M. Schnitzer. 1978. Use characteristics of the Great Gulf Wilderness. Research Paper NE-428. USDA Forest Servicc, Northeast Experiment Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. C. 1980. Use patterns and visitor characteristics, attitudes, and preferences in nine wilderness and other roadless areas. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-253.

  • Lucas, R. C., D. Cole, and G. Stankey. 1985. Research update: What have we learned about wilderness management.In D. Frome (ed.), Issues in wilderness management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggenbuck, J. W., and D. Berrier. 1982. A comparison of the effectiveness of two communication strategies in dispersing wilderness campers.Journal of Leisure Research 14(2):77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggenbuck, J. W., and R. C. Lucas. 1986. Wilderness use and user characteristics: A state-of-knowledge review. Pages 204–245,in R. C. Lucas (compiler), Proceedings—National wilderness research conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions. Fort Collins, Colorado 23–26 July 1985. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station General Technical Report INT-220, Ogden, Utah, 369 pp.

  • Stankey, G. 1973. Visitor perception of wilderness carrying capacity. Research Paper INT-142. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankey, G., R. Lucas, and D. Lime. 1976. Crowding in parks and wilderness.Design and Experiment 7(3):38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Congress. Eastern Wilderness Act of 1975. Washington, DC.

  • USFS (United States Forest Service). 1989. Pemigewasset Wilderness plan. USDA, White Mountain National Forest District Headquarters.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, C.M., Halstead, J.M. & Luloff, A.E. Information as a management tool: An evaluation of the Pemigewasset Wilderness management plan. Environmental Management 16, 143–148 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393819

Key words

Navigation