Abstract
Channel changes from 1919 to 1989 were documented in two study reaches of the Merced River in Yosemite National Park through a review of historical photographs and documents and a comparison of survey data. Bank erosion was prevalent and channel width increased an average of 27% in the upstream reach, where human use was concentrated. Here, trampling of the banks and riparian vegetation was common, and banks eroded on straight stretches as frequently as on meander bends. Six bridges in the upper reach constrict the channel by an average of 38% of the original width, causing severe erosion. In the downstream control reach, where human use was minimal, channel widths both decreased and increased, with a mean increase of only 4% since 1919. Bank erosion in the control reach occurred primarily on meander bends. The control reach also had denser stands of riparian vegetation and a higher frequency of large woody debris in channels. There is only one bridge in the lower reach, located at the downstream end. Since 1919, bank erosion in the impacted upstream reach contributed a significant amount of sediment (74,800 tonnes, equivalent to 2.0 t/km2/yr) to the river. An analysis of 75 years of precipitation and hydrologic records showed no trends responsible for bank erosion in the upper reach. Sediment input to the upper reach has not changed significantly during the study period. Floodplain soils are sandy, with low cohesion and are easily detached by lateral erosion. The degree of channel widening was positively correlated with the percentage of bare ground on the streambanks and low bank stability ratings. Low bank stability ratings were, in turn, strongly associated with high human use areas. Channel widening and bank erosion in the upper reach were due primarily to destruction of riparian vegetation by human trampling and the effect of bridge constrictions on high flow, and secondarily to poorly installed channel revetments. Several specific recommendations for river restoration were provided to park management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Andrews, E. D., and D. C. Erman. 1986. Persistence in the size distribution of surficial bed material during an extreme snowmelt flood, Sagehen Creek, northeastern California.Water Resources Research 22(2):191–197.
Blodgett, J. C. 1989. Assessment of hydraulic changes associated with removal of Cascade Dam, Merced River, Yosemite Valley, California. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-733, 15 pp.
California Department of Water Resources. 1981. California Annual Summary. Monthly Total Precipitation 1849–1980.
Foster, J. L., and S. E. Samson. 1992. A special investigation of soils found in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park. Page 324in Agronomy Abstracts, 1992 Annual Meeting. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Gibbens, R. P., and H. F. Heady. 1964. The influence of modern man on the vegetation of Yosemite Valley. California Agricultural Experimental Station Manual 36, 44 pp.
Gradek, P., L. Saslaw, and S. Nelson. 1989. An application of BLM's riparian inventory procedure to rangeland riparian resources in the Kern and Kaweah River watersheds. Pages 109–115in D. L. Abell (ed.), Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference. General Technical Report PSW 110. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Berkeley, California. Pacific Southwest Region, 544 pp.
Hill, B. H., and K. M. Nolan. 1990. Sediment-source data for four basins tributary to Lake Tahoe, California and Nevada: August 1983–June 1988. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-618, 43 pp.
Holmes, D. O., and H. E. M. Dobson. 1976. Ecological carrying capacity research: Yosemite National Park. Part I: The effects of human trampling and urine on subalpine vegetation; a survey of past and present backcountry use, and the ecological carrying capacity of the wilderness. Unpublished report. National Park Service, San Francisco, California, 247 pp.
Kisanuki, T. T., and T. A. Shaw. 1992. Merced River habitat typing underwater fish observations and habitat restoration recommendations: Yosemite National Park, July, 1991. US Fish and Wildlife Report AFF1-FRO-92-03. Arcata, California, 37 pp.
Knighton, D. 1984. Fluvial forms and processes. Edward Arnold, Baltimore, Maryland, 218 pp.
Kondolf, M. G. and S. S. Cook. 1986. Reconnaissance-level studies of geomorphic and hydrologic questions relevant to assessment of environmental impacts of the proposed El Portal hydroelectric project (FERC no. 3581). Submitted to the Environmental Sciences Division. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 5 December 1986.
Madej, M. A., W. E. Weaver, and D. K. Hagans. 1991. Analysis of bank erosion on the Merced River, Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park. Unpublished National Park Service report. Arcata, California, 161 pp.
Matthes, F. E. 1936. Memorandum to the Superintendent. Yosemite National Park. Unpublished memorandum.
Milestone, J. F. 1978. The influence of modern man on the stream system of Yosemite Valley. Master's thesis. San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 227 pp.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 1950–1990. Climatological data, California, vol 54–94.
Pfankuch, D. J. 1975. Stream reach inventory and channel stability evaluation. Publication number RI-75-002. Missoula, Montana. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Region, 26 pp.
Platts, W. S., and R. L. Nelson. 1985. Stream habitat and fisheries response to livestock grazing and instream improvement structures: Big Creek, Utah.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 40(4):374–379.
Platts, W. S., C. Armour, G. D. Booth, M. Bryant, J. L. Bufford, P. Cuplin, S. H. Jensen, G. W. Lienkaemper, G. W. Minshall, S. B. Monsen, R. L. Nelson, J. R. Sedell, and J. S. Tuhy. 1978. Methods for evaluating riparian habitats with applications to management. General technical report INT-221. Ogden, Utah, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 177 pp.
Richards, K. R. 1982. Rivers, form and process in alluvial channels. Methuen, New York, 358 pp.
Sullivan, K., T. Lisle, A. Dolloff, G. Grant and L. Reid. 1987. Stream channels: The links between forests and fishes. Pages 39–97.in E. O. Salo and T. W. Cundy (eds.), Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. University of Washington Institute of Forest Resources, No. 57.
USDA (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). 1992. Yosemite National Park soil survey. Draft report.
USDI (US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Yosemite National Park). 1980. Final environmental impact statement and general management plan. Yosemite National Park, California, 242 pp.
Wahrhaftig, C. 1962. Geomorphology of the Yosemite Valley region, California. Pages 33–46in Part I—Geologic guide of the Merced Canyon and Yosemite Valley. California Department of Mines and Geology Bulletin No. 182.
Walsh, R. G. 1980. An economic evaluation of the general management plan for Yosemite National Park. Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State University. Technical report No. 19, 65 pp.
Zinke, P. J., and E. Alexander. 1963. The soil and vegetation of Yosemite Valley. Unpublished progress report to the National Park Service, Regional Office, San Francisco, California, 86 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madej, M.A., Weaver, W.E. & Hagans, D.K. Analysis of bank erosion on the Merced River, Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Environmental Management 18, 235–250 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393764
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393764