Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental policy indicators: A systems model

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes and tests a systems theory-based policy indicators model. The framework is used to examine propositions about linkages between states' ecological-spatial characteristics and subsequent selected solid waste management (SWM) -related environmental policies. It was hypothesized that state characteristics of: (1) population density (used as a garbage-per-land area index), (2) population convergence within urban areas, and (3) percent population change in the interval 1980–1985, could jointly explain state variation in both the number and the vigor of SWM policy outputs. Greater levels of spatial pressure were proposed to be related directly to more numerous, more convincing policies. Proposals are grounded in the literature of organizational search theory, crisis stimulation, and technological pressure.

Results revealed that the sociospatial model in fact could explain a reasonable proportion of policy variation across states. However, not all hypotheses are supported. Population change shows an indirect, rather than the anticipated direct, relationship with policy output levels. In addition, when used in the model as a pollution intensity index, population density failed to contribute significantly to an explanation of differences in state SWM policy levels. The analysis raises questions about changes occurring over time in the nature and direction of linkages between sociospatial measures and policy responses. This study suggests that strengthening policy indicator models may require questioning key assumptions and theoretical bases, conducting longitudinal studies, and factoring in political, economic, and other policy environment forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Berry, W. D., S. Feldman. 1985. Multiple regression in practice. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M., Jr. 1979. Social statistics, revised 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. 1991. Industry, EPA, States—urge FTC to issue national labeling guidelines. Environmental Reporter, pp. 646–647, 0013-9211/91, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Y. H., and G. Frederickson. 1973. Determinants of public policy in the American states: A model for synthesis. Sage Professional Paper, Beverly, Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E. 1980. Determinants of state growth management policy. Pages 151–163in T. R. Dye and V. Gray (eds.), The determinants of public policy Lexington Books, Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. 1966. Politics, economics, and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. 1987. Understanding public policy, 6th ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. 1957. An approach to the analysis of political systems.World Politics 9:383–400. Page 41in Thomas R. Dye. 1987. Understanding public policy, 6th ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. 1965a. A framework for political analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. 1965b. Pages 17–35in A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley, New York. Pages 428–436in W. Buckley (ed.). 1968. Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: A sourcebook. Aldine Publishing, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. 1988. Constructing the political spectacle. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G., and I. Sharkansky. 1978. The policy predicament. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, C. H. 1975. The politics of pollution in a comparative perspective: Ecology and power in four nations. David McKay, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. The solid waste dilemma: An agenda for action. EPA/530-SW-89-019. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OS-305), EPA Washington, DC.

  • Fabricant, S. 1952. The trend of government—activity in the United States since 1900. Pages 4–6, 11in J. W. Foley. 1978. A comparative study of the determinants of public policies: A review of two decades of multi-disciplinary, quantitative research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. W. 1961. Determinants of state and local government expenditures: A preliminary analysis. National Tax Journal. Pages 11–15.in J. W. Foley. 1978. A comparative study of the determinants of public policies: A review of two decades of multi-disciplinary, quantitative research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. W. 1978. A comparative study of the determinants of public policies: A review of two decades of multi-disciplinary, quantitative research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, B. R., and R. F. Winters. 1970. The politics of redistribution.American Political Science Review 64:508–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. 1958. The affluent society. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, K. W. 1979. Controlling air pollution. Why some states try harder. Policy Studies Journal, 7(4):728–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumm, J. G. 1971. The effects of legislative structure on legislative performance. Pages 298–332in R. I. Hofferbert and I. Sharkansky (eds.), State and urban politics: Readings in comparative public policy, 2nd ed. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferbert, R. I. 1966. Ecological development and policy change in the American states.Midwest Journal of Political Science 10:464–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.O. 1976. Regulating the environment. Pages 388–427in Jacob and K. N. Vines (eds.), Politics in the American States, 3rd ed. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. L., and R. C. Noll. 1981. Regulation in theory and practice: An overview. Pages 1–23in G. Fromm (ed.), Studies in public regulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, D. 1958. The passing of traditional society. Page 9in T. R. Dye. 1966. Politics, economics, and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. P., and A. O'M Bowman. 1989. Implementing environmental policy in a federal system: A test of the Sabatier-Mazmanian model.Polity, 21(4):731–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. P., and E. N. Lombard. 1990. The comparative analysis of state environmental policy.Natural Resources Journal 30(2):301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. P., J. L. Franke, A. O'M. Bowman and K. W. Kramer. 1983. Hazardous wastes, politics, and public policy: A comparative state analysis.The Western Political Quarterly 36(2):257–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. 1977. Relative importance of socioeconomic and political variables for public policy.American Political Science Review 71:559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. 1960. Political man. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahar, K. 1988. Recycling: War on waste needs allies—not enemies.Beverage Industry 79(5):20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantell, E. H. 1985. On the economics and the politics of environmental protection.American Journal of Economics and Sociology 44(4):435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., and P. A. Sabatier. 1980. A multivariate model of policy-making.American Journal of Political Science 24(3):439–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, J. M. 1975. The environmental, politics, and policy literature: A critique and reformulation.The Western Political Quarterly 28(4):646–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias, D. and C. Nachmias. 1987. Research methods in the social sciences, 3rd ed. St. Martin's Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Solid Wastes Management Association. 1989. Special report—landfill capacity in the year 2000. National Solid Wastes Management Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nice, D. C. 1987. Incremental and nonincremental policy responses: The states and the railroads.Polity 20(1):145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, L. 1988. Waste-to-energy incineration is not threat to waste-paper supply.Pulp & Paper, 62(2):62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, S. C. 1976. American state legislatures and public policy. Pages 139–195in H. Jacob and K. N. Vines (eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis. 3rd ed. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resource Recovery Solutions, Inc. 1989. Municipal Solid Waste: Phoenix, AZ. Resource. Recovery Solutions, Inc. Phoenix, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, S. 1987. The state of the states. Fund for Renewable Energy and the Environment, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, N. R. 1976. Land use and the legislatures: The politics of state innovation. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. 1977. Regulatory policy-making: Toward a framework of analysis.Natural Resources Journal 17:415–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A., and D. A. Mazmanian. 1980. The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis.Policy Studies Journal 8:538–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R. L. 1976. The literture of systematic quantitative comparison in American state politics: An assessment. Center for the Study of Federalism, Temple University, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, I. 1971. Economic development, regionalism and state political systems. Pages 130–149in R. I. Hofferbert and I. Sharkansky (eds.), State and urban politics: Readings in comparative public policy. Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkansky, I., and R. I. Hofferbert. 1969. Dimensions of state politics, economics, and public policy.American Political Science Review 63:867–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, R. 1978. The effect of population growth upon state and local government expenditure. Page 12in J. W. Foley (ed.), A comparative study of the determinants of public policies: A review of two decades of multi-disciplinary, quantitative research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. J., and M. J. Scicchitano. 1985. State implementation effort and federal regulatory policy: The case of occupational safety and health.Journal of Politics 47(2):686–703.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, F. J., and M. J. Scicchitano. 1987. State implementation and federal enforcement priorities: Safety versus health in OSHA and the states.Administration & Society 91(1):95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H. J. 1982. It's about time: The use of time in cross-sectional state policy research.American Journal of Political Science 26(1):176–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. 1978. Three extracts on public finance. Pages 1, 21–22in J. W. Foley (ed.), A comparative study of the determinants of public policies: A review of two decades of multi-disciplinary, quantitative research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A., and A. R. Matheny. 1984. Testing theoriesof social regulation: Hazardous waste regulation in the American states.The Journal of Politics 46(2):428–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (ed.). 1980. The politics of regulation. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. K. 1989. Policy making in the American states: Typology, process, and institutions.Policy Studies Review 8(3):527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration, University of Nevada, 89154-6022, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

    Leslie Edwards Cummings

  2. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 85287-0603, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    N. Joseph Cayer

Authors
  1. Leslie Edwards Cummings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Joseph Cayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummings, L.E., Cayer, N.J. Environmental policy indicators: A systems model. Environmental Management 17, 655–667 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393727

Key words

Search

Navigation