Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a decision support system for Prioritization of multimedia dischargers

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1990 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began sponsoring several pilot projects in its regional offices to examine the potential benefits of adopting a multimedia approach to facility management. This approach differs from traditional practices at EPA in that facilities (dischargers regulated under permits issued by the agency) are managed based upon their cumulative impacts to all media: air, water, and land. Currently, facilities are managed by separate programs at EPA that evaluate environmental impacts from a single-media perspective.

One aspect of discharger management is the necessity to allocate limited financial resources in a way that will minimize risk to human health and the environment. A careful, risk-based prioritization of facilities is one means of providing insight to the most effective strategy of allocating monitoring, inspection, and enforcement resources. Prioritization from a multimedia perspective is particularly difficult, however, since it requires translation and integration of medium-specific facility performances, management objectives, and perceptions of risk into a cumulative rating.

A computerized decision support system (DSS) designed to guide management through the prioritization process from a multimedia perspective was identified as a potentially valuable tool for use in the pilot projects. This article describes the development of such a prototype, outlines the features of the completed system, and discusses its potential for use at EPA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andriole, S. J. 1989. Advanced decision technology for next generation decision support.Information and Decision Technologies 15:243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P. 1989. Basic principles of human-computer interface design. Hutchinson Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J. L. 1978. Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontane, D. G., and M. Flug. 1991. Introduction to multicriterion methods and selected software. Pages 449–453in J. L. Anderson (ed.), Water resources: Planning and management and urban water resources, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference and Symposium. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea, A. 1982. Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, P. K., and N. M. Duffy. 1987. Top management perspectives on decision support systems.Information and Management 12:21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabs, D. J., and R. N. Palmer. 1991. Evaluation of a decision support system for the prioritization of multimedia facilities. Water resource series, Technical report no. 132. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J. F., L. M. Applegate, and B. R. Konsynski. 1988. Computer aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support.Operations Research 36(6):826–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, K. J. 1989. Individual and small group decisions. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, P., and N. Pliskin. 1988. Structured prototyping: Integrating prototyping into structured system development.Information and Management 14:19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A. 1988. Human-computer interface design. Macmillan Education Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, E. 1988. Decision support and expert systems—managerial perspectives. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. 1973. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3(1):28–43.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Engineering and Sciences Program Department of Civil Engineering, FX-10, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Allison M. Keyes & Richard N. Palmer

Authors
  1. Allison M. Keyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard N. Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keyes, A.M., Palmer, R.N. Development of a decision support system for Prioritization of multimedia dischargers. Environmental Management 17, 601–612 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393722

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393722

Key words

Search

Navigation