Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cumulative environmental change: Conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cumulative environmental change or cumulative effects may result from the additive effect of individual actions of the same nature or the interactive effect of multiple actions of a different nature. This article reviews conceptual frameworks of cumulative environmental change and describes analytical and institutional approaches to cumulative effects assessment (CEA). A causal model is a common theoretical construct, although the frameworks vary in their emphasis on different components of the model. Two broad approaches to CEA are distinguished: one scientific and the other planning oriented. These approaches should not be interpreted as competing paradigms but rather different interpretations of the scope of CEA. Each approach can provide a distinct but complementary contribution to the analysis, assessment, and management of cumulative effects. A comparison of the institutional and legislative response to CEA in Canada and the United States shows that Canada is following the American example of incorporating the analysis and assessment of cumulative effects into regulatory actions and administrative procedures that also govern environmental impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andrews, R. N. L. 1973. A philosophy of environmental impact assessment.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 28:197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, A. 1990. Integrating impact assessment in the planning process: From rhetoric to reality.Impact Assessment Bulletin 8(1&2):3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardecki, M. J. 1990. Coping with cumulative impacts: An assessment of legislative and administrative mechanisms.Impact Assessment Bulletin 8 (1&2):318–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, G. 1986. Some scientific issues in cumulative environmental impact assessment. Pages 9–14in Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council (CEARC) and National Research Council (NRC). Proceedings of the workshop on cumulative environmental effects: A binational perspective. CEARC, Hull, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beanlands, G. E., and P. N. Duinker. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University and the Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 132 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, B. L., and E. M. Preston. 1988. Developing the scientific basis for assessing cumulative effects of wetland loss and degradation on landscape functions: Status, perspectives, and prospects.Environmental Management 12:751–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, T. R. 1977. Northern frontier, norther homeland: The report of the Mackenzie Valley pipeline inquiry, Vol 1. Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 213 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braid, R. B., M. Schweitzer, S. A., Carnes, and E. J. Soderstrom. 1985. The importance of cumulative impacts for socioeconomic impact assessment and mitigation.Energy 10:643–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronson, E., S. K. Sears, and W. M. Paterson. 1991. A perspective on cumulative effects assessment. Report No. 91016. Environmental Studies and Assessments Department, Ontario Hydro, Toronto, Ontario, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cada, G. F., and C. T. Hunsaker. 1990. Cumulative impacts of hydropower development: Reaching a watershed in impact assessment.Environmental Professional 12:2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (DFFP). 1991. Draft guidelines for assessment of cumulative impacts. DFFP, Sacramento, California, 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. 1992. Bill C-13. 19 March 1992, House of Commons, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • CEARC (Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council). 1988. The assessment of cumulative effects: A research prospecuts. CEARC, Hull, Quebec, 11 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEARC and NRC (Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council and United States National Research Council). 1986. Proceedings of the workshop on cumulative environmental effects: A binational perspective. CEARC, Hull, Quebec, 175 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M. J. 1984. Cumulative socioeconomic monitoring: issues and indicators for the Beaufort region. Energy, Mines and Resources Secretariat, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, 167 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. C. 1986. The cumulative impacts of human activities on the atmosphere. Pages 113–123in CEARC and USNRC. Proceedings of the workshop on cumulative environmental effects: A binational perspective. CEARC, Hull, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, E. W., E. C. Vlachos, and G. C. Horak. 1983. State-of-the-art and theoretical basis of assessing cumulative impacts on fish and wildlife. Office of Biological Services, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobourn, J. 1989. Is cumulative watershed effects analysis coming of age?Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44:267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin, C., S. Parker, and J. Hay. 1992a. Notes on cumulative environmental change I: concepts and issues.Journal of Environmental Management 35:31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin, C., S. Parker, and J. Hay. 1992b. Notes on cumulative environmental change II: A contribution to methodology.Journal of Environmental Management 35:51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, S., K. W. Strong, T. E. Hickey, and F. Sander. 1985. An envolving (sic) framework for environmental impact analysis. I. Methods.Journal of Environmental Management 21:343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contant, C. K., and L. L. Wiggins. 1991. Defining and analyzing cumulative environmental impacts.Environmental Impact Asessment Review 11:297–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. F., and P. H. Zedler. 1980. Ecological assessment for regional development.Journal of Environmental Management 10:285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, R. H. 1986. Vermont's Act 250 after 15 years: Can the permit system address cumulative impacts?Environmental Impact Assessment Review 6:135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K. 1991. Towards ecosystem-based planning: A perspective on cumulative environmental effects. Prepared for the royal commission on the future of the Toronto waterfront and Environment Canada. Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa, Ontario, 106 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickert, T. G., and A. E. Tuttle. 1985. Cumulative impact assessment in environmental planning: A coastal wetland watershed example.Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5:27–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEARO (Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office). 1984. Beaufort Sea hydrocarbon production and transportation. Final report of the Environmental Assessment Panel. FEARO, Hull, Quebec, 146 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEARO (Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office). 1990a. The Northumberland Strait crossing project. Report of the Environmental Assessment Panel. FEARO, Hull, Quebec, 46 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEARO. (Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office). 1990b. Guidelines for the preparation of an environmental impact statement on air transportation proposals for the Toronto area. FEARO, Hull, Quebec, 22 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, D. J. 1979. Destruction by insignificant increments.Northern Perspectives 7:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink, J. G., G. P. Shaffer, L. C. Lee, D. M. Burdick, D. L. Childers, N. C. Leibowitz, S. C. Hamilton, R. Boumans, D. Cushman, S. Fields, M. Koch, and J. M. Visser. 1990. Landscape conservation in a forested wetland watershed: Can we manage cumulative impacts?Bioscience 40:588–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herson, A. I., and K. M. Bogdan. 1991. Cumulative impact analysis under NEPA: Recent legal developments.Environmental Professional 13:100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. 1988. Regulatory context for cumulative impact research.Environmental Management 12:715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollick, M. 1981. Environmental impact assessment as a planning tool.Journal of Environmental Management 12:79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak, G. C., E. V. Vlachos, and E. W. Cline. 1983. Methodological guidance for assessing cumulative impacts on fish and wildlife. Office of Biological Services, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 102 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P. 1990. Cumulative effects assessment and regional planning in southern Ontario. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec, 45 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker, C. T. 1989. Ecosystem assessment methods for cumulative effects at the regional scale. Paper presented at the scientific challenges of NEPA: Future directions based on 20 years of experience. 24–27 October 1989, Knoxville, Tennesee, 21 pp.

  • Hunsaker, C. T., R. L. Graham, G. W. Suter II, R. V. O'Neil, L. W. Barnthouse, and R. H. Gardner. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale.Environmental Management 14:325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, F., and B. Rodes. 1992. Making decisions on cumulative environmental impacts: A conceptual framework. World Wildlife Fund, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, P., and B. Sadler. 1990. Sustainable development and environmental assessment: Perspectives on planning for a common future. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec, 182 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. A., N. E. Detenbeck, J. P. Bonde, and G. J. Niemi. 1988. Geographic information systems for cumulative impact assessment.Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54:1609–1615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D., R. P. Cote, B. Nicholls, and P. Ricketts. 1987. Developing a strategic assessment and planning framework for the marine environment.Journal of Environmental Management 25:219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. A., R. R. Wallace, R. J. Johnson, and D. Bernard. 1988. A reference guide to cumulative effects assessment in Canada. Volume 1. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. 1982. The future development of environmental impact assessment.Journal of Environmental Management 14:71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart-Cowan, I. 1976. Cumulative impact of development of the Mackenzie Estuary/Delta, N. W. T.In Mackenzie Delta: Priorities and alternatives, Conference Proceedings, 3–4 December, 1975, Camadian Arctic Resources Committee, Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, L. 1990. Report on phase I of proposed Canada/U.S. research project on cumulative loss of prairie wetlands. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, W. E. 1982. Environmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions.Bioscience 32:728–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, T., and W. R. D. Sewell. 1981. From project appraisal to policy review. Pages 1–28in T. O'Riordan and W. R. D. Sewell (eds.) Project appraisal and policy review. John Wiley, New York, 304 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, B. 1990. Cumulative habitat loss: Cracks in the environmental review process.Natural Areas Journal 10:76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E. B., Y.-H. Chan, N. M. Peterson, G. A. Constable, R. B. Caton, C. S. Davis, R. R. Wallace, and G. A. Yarranton. 1987. Cumulative effects assessment in Canada: An agenda for action and research. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec, 63 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, E. M., and B. L. Bedford. 1988. Evaluating cumulative effects on wetland functions: A conceptual overview and generic framework.Environmental Management 12:565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. M. 1991. New developments in federal environmental assessment.Impact Assessment Bulletin 9(4):57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, B. (1990). An evaluation of the Beaufort Sea Environmental Assessment Panel review. Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office, Hull, Quebec, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser, H., and F. B. Samson. 1985. Cumulative effects analysis: An advance in wildlife planning and management.Transactions of the North America Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference 50:313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneller-McDonald, K., and G. C. Horak. 1988. Cumulative impact assessment: Legal and regulatory status. National Ecology Research Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigal, L., and J. W. Webb. 1989. The programmatic environmental impact statement: Its purpose and use.The Environmental Professional 11:14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, N. C., R. R. Everitt, L. P. Rattie, D. L. Colnett, C. P. Wolf, J. C. Truett, A. H. J. Dorcey, and C. S. Holling. 1987. Cumulative effects assessment: A context for further research and development. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec, 91 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stakhiv, E. Z. 1988. An evaluation paradigm for cumulative impact analysis.Environmental Management 12:725–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stakhiv, E. Z. 1991. A cumulative impact analysis framework for the US Army Corps of Engineers regulatory program. Draft Report (February 1991). Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 282 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stull, E. A., K. E. LaGory, and W. S. Vinikour. 1987. Methodologies for assessing cumulative environmental effects of hydroelectric development on fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin, Vols 1 and 2. Bonneville Power Administration, US Department of Energy, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stull, E. A., M. B. Bain, J. S. Irving, K. E. LaGory, R. D. Olsen, and G. W. Witmer. 1988. Cumulative impact assessment: Issues to consider in selecting a cumulative assessment method. Pages 636–641in B. W. Clowes (ed.), Waterpower '87: Proceedings of the international conference on hydropower, 19–21 August 1987, Portland, Oregon, Vol 1. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, E., and D. W. Hendricks. 1976. Secondary impacts and consequences of highway projects. DOT-05-50043. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogd, H. 1983. Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London, 367 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S. C. 1990. Cumulative impacts assessment and management planning: Lessons learned to date. Unpublished manuscript. National Ecology Research Center, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, G. W., M. B. Bain, J. S. Irving, R. L. Kruger, T. A. O'Neil, R. D. Olsen, and E. A. Stull. 1988. Cumulative impact assessment: Application of a methodology. Pages 642–650in B. W. Clowes (ed.), Waterpower '87: Proceedings of the international conference on hydropower, 19–21 August 1987, Portland, Oregon, Vol 1. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. 1988. EIA in plan-making. Pages 98–114in P. Wathern (ed.), Environmental impact assessment: Theory and practice. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., and M. Dejeddour. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: EA of policies, plans and programmes.Impact Assessment Bulletin 10(1):3–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Guelph, N1G 2W1, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Harry Spaling & Barry Smit

Authors
  1. Harry Spaling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barry Smit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spaling, H., Smit, B. Cumulative environmental change: Conceptual frameworks, evaluation approaches, and institutional perspectives. Environmental Management 17, 587–600 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393721

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393721

Key words

Search

Navigation