Abstract
Based on a year of fieldwork in a large, mixed-practice veterinary clinic in New England, this discussion focuses on the criteria veterinarians use to evaluate and define certain clients as problematic. Doctors and clinical staff define most negatively those clients who are especially ignorant concerning basic features of being an owner, are argumentative or demanding, display concern for fees over the welfare of their animals, are apparently negligent of or abusive toward their pets, or are problematically over-involved with their animal companions. Comparisons are drawn between the typologizing activities of veterinarians and those of physicians and other service workers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Veterinary Medical Association (1988),The Veterinary Services Market for Companion Animals, prepared by Charles, Charles Research Group, Overland Park, Kansas.
Antelyes, Jacob (1990), “Client Relations when the Animal Dominates,”Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 196(4):578–580.
Becker, Howard, Blanche Geer, Everett Hughes, and Anselm Strauss (1961),Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Conrad, Peter and Rochelle Kern (eds.) (1981),The Sociology of Health and Illness: Critical Perspectives, New York: St. Martin's.
Danziger, Sandra Klein (1981), “The Uses of Expertise in Doctor-Patient Encounters During Pregnancy,” pp. 359–376 in Peter Conrad and Rochelle Kern (eds.),The Sociology of Health and Illness: Critical Perspectives.
Gregory, Stanford and Stephen Keto (1991), “Creation of the ‘Virtual Patient’ in Medical Interaction: A Comparison of Doctor/Patient and Veterinarian/Client Relationships,” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Sociological Association, Cincinnati.
Herzog, Harold, Tamara Vore, and John New, Jr. (1989), “Conversations with Veterinary Students,”Anthrozoos 2(3):181–188.
Lazare, Aaron, S. Eisenthal, A. Frank, and J. Stoeckle (1987), “Studies in a Negotiated Approach to Patienthood,” pp. 413–432 in John Stoeckle (ed.),Encounters Between Patients and Doctors.
Lorber, Judith (1981), “Good Patients and Problem Patients: Conformity and Deviance in a General Hospital,” pp. 395–404 in Peter Conrad and Rochelle Kern (eds.),The Sociology of Health and Illness: Critical Perspectives.
Mennerick, Lewis (1974), “Client Typologies: A Method for Coping with Conflict in the Service Worker-Client Relationship,”Sociology of Work and Occupations 1:396–418.
Owens, Jerry (1986), “The Art of Practice,”Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Animal Hospital Association, New Orleans, pp. 585–593.
Reeder, Leo (1972), “The Patient-Client as a Consumer: Some Observations on the Changing Professional-Client Relationship,”Journal of Health and Social Behavior 13:406–411.
Sanders, Clinton, (1990), “Excusing Tactics: Social Responses to the Public Misbehavior of Companion Animals,”Anthrozoos 4(2):82–90.
Sanders, Clinton (1993), “Understanding Dogs: Caretakers' Attributions of Mindedness in Canine-Human Relationships,”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(2):205–226.
Sanders, Clinton (forthcoming), “Biting the Hand that Heals You: Encounters with Problematic Patients in a General Veterinary practice,”Society and Animals.
Schwartz, Charlotte Green and Merton Kahne (1983), “Medical Help as a Negotiated Achievement,”Psychiatry 36:333–350.
Stoeckle, John D. (ed.) (1987),Encounters Between Patients and Doctors, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanders, C.R. Annoying owners: Routine interactions with problematic clients in a general veterinary practice. Qual Sociol 17, 159–170 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393499
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393499