Advertisement

Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 453–469 | Cite as

Internal exclusion of leprosy sufferers: Dual ambivalence and its theoretical implications

  • Liora Navon
Article
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

On the basis of an anthropological study combined with historical investigation, this paper analyzes Thai people's responses toward leprosy prior to the discovery of a cure for the disease. The findings indicate that the ambivalent perception of leprosy sufferers as anomalous figures led to their ambivalent segregation within the framework of the community. The analysis of this dual ambivalence is revealed as capable of reconciling two approaches to the study of deviance, grounded in conflicting assumptions concerning individual and cultural tolerance of ambivalence: the first focusing on ambivalent perceptions of social deviants, and the second dealing with ambivalent behavioral reactions toward them.

Key words

ambivalence social deviance anomaly liminality leprosy Thailand 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ablon, J. (1990). Ambiguity and difference: Families with dwarf children.Social Science and Medicine, 30, 879–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (1991).Modernity and ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. S. (1963).Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966).The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  5. Bock, C. (1884).Temples and elephants: The narrative of a journey of exploration through Upper Siam and Lao. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A. J. (c.1925).The expectation of Siam. New York: Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A.Google Scholar
  7. Buker, R. S. (1955). The value of leprosy villages in a program of prevention.International Journal of Leprosy, 23, 61–68.Google Scholar
  8. Cantlie, J. (1897). Report on the conditions under which leprosy occurs in China, Indo-China, Malaya, the Archipelago and Oceania — compiled chiefly during 1894. In J. A. Thompson & J. Cantlie,Prize essays on leprosy, Vol. 162. London: The New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
  9. Chiengmai Leper Asylum. (1923a). Extracts from the report for 1920.Siam Outlook, 3, 278–282.Google Scholar
  10. Chiengmai Leper Asylum. (1923b). Extracts from the report of the Chiengmai Leper Asylum for the year 1921.Siam Outlook, 3, 284–290.Google Scholar
  11. Chiengmai Leper Asylum. (1939).Glimpses of the Chiengmai Leper Asylum, Chiengmai, Siam. Bangkok: Stationers Printing Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cochrane, R. G. (1929).Leprosy in the Far East. London: World Dominion Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, E. (1991).Thai society in comparative perspective: Collected essays. Bangkok: White Lotus.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, J. (1980). Factors affecting community participation in leprosy control in Nepal. InProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Leprosy Control in Asia (pp. 24–36). Tokyo: Sasakawa Memorial Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1980).Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby.Google Scholar
  16. Cort, E. C. (1916). Chaulmoogra oil treatments in Chiengmai Leper Asylum and its encouraging results.Laos News, 12, 71–73.Google Scholar
  17. Cort, M. L. (1886).Siam; or, the heart of Farther India. New York: Anson D. F. Randolph.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, M. (1966).Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Douglas, M. (1975).Implicit meanings: Essays in anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbons, F. X., Sawin, L. G., & Gibbons, B. N. (1979). Evaluations of mentally retarded persons: “Sympathy” or patronization?American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 124–131.Google Scholar
  21. Gillies, R. M. (1923). The dedication of the James M. Patton Village.Siam Outlook, 3, 291–292.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1963).Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Goode, E. (1975). On behalf of labeling theory.Social Problems, 22, 570–583.Google Scholar
  24. Hanna, L. S. (1933). In Naaman's house.Siam Outlook, 9, 74–77.Google Scholar
  25. Harman, L. D. (1985). Acceptable deviance as social control: The cases of fashion and slang.Deviant Behavior, 6, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hepworth, M., & Turner, B. S. (1982).Confession: Studies in deviance and religion. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A. H., Markus, H., Miller, D. T., Scott, R. A., & French, R. de S. (1984).Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  28. Jopling, W. H. (1984).Handbook of Leprosy, 3rd ed. London: William Heinemann Medical Books.Google Scholar
  29. Katz, I., & Hass, R. Glen (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Katz, J. (1975). Essences as moral identities: Verifiability and responsibility in imputations of deviance and charisma.American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1369–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerr, J. M. (1973). Social factors operating against effective leprosy control in the highlands of Papua New Guinea.Papua New Guinea Medical Journal, 16, 118–120.Google Scholar
  32. Keyes, C. F. (1975). Buddhism in a secular city: A view from Chiang Mai. InVisakha Puja, B.E. 2518 (pp. 62–72). Bangkok: Buddhist Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
  33. Klausner, W. J. (1971). Popular Buddhism in Northeast Thailand. InVisakha Puja, B.E. 2514 (pp. 36–41). Bangkok: Buddhist Association of Thailand.Google Scholar
  34. Klausner, W. J., & Klausner, K. (n.d.).Conflict or communication. Bangkok: Business Information & Research.Google Scholar
  35. Kumaresan, J. A., & Maganu, E. T. (1994). Socio-cultural dimensions of leprosy in north-western Botswana.Social Science and Medicine, 39, 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Landon, K. P. (1939).Siam in transition: A brief survey of cultural trends in the five years since the revolution of 1932. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Laos News. (1908). Personal and otherwise.Laos News, 5, 91–92.Google Scholar
  38. Laos News. (1914). Personal and otherwise.Laos News, 11, 13–16.Google Scholar
  39. Laughlin, C. D. (1993). Fuzziness and phenomenology in ethnological research: Insights from fuzzy set theory.Journal of Anthropological Research, 49, 17–37.Google Scholar
  40. Levine, D. N. (1985).The flight from ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mason, C. W. (1908). A castaway patient.Laos News, 5, 104–106.Google Scholar
  42. Mason, C. W. (1914). Chiengmai Hospital notes.Laos News, 11, 121–122.Google Scholar
  43. McCauley, R. N. (1987). The role of theories in a theory of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.),Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 288–309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. McKean, J. W. (1907). Extension of medical work in Chieng Mai.Laos News, 4, 115–118.Google Scholar
  45. McKean, J. W. (1929). Chiengmai Leper Asylum, 1908–1929.Siam Outlook, 6, 366–369.Google Scholar
  46. McKean, L. B. (n.d.).The Pluckiest Grandmother. New York: American Mission to Lepers.Google Scholar
  47. Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (1976). Sociological ambivalence. In R. K. Merton,Sociological ambivalence and other essays (pp. 3–31). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mulder, N. (1979).Everyday life in Thailand: An interpretation. Bangkok: Duang Kamol.Google Scholar
  49. Murphy, R. F., Scheer, J., Murphy, Y., & Mack, R. (1988). Physical disability and social liminality: A study in the rituals of adversity.Social Science and Medicine, 26, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mutatkar, R. K. (1979).Society and leprosy. Pune: Shubhada-Saraswat Publications for Gandhi Memorial Leprosy Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Nuckolls, C. W. (1993). The anthropology of explanation.Anthropological Quarterly, 66, 1–21.Google Scholar
  52. Oberdoerffer, M. J. (1939). Leprosy in Siam.Journal of the Thailand Research Society (Natural History Supplement)12, 141–152.Google Scholar
  53. Park, C. M. (1939). Kiulungkiang.Siam Outlook, 10, 63–72.Google Scholar
  54. Pina-Cabral, J. (1986).Sons of Adam, daughters of Eve: The peasant worldview of Alto Minho. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rangel, L. B. (1986). Com a morte na alma: Um ensaio sobre a construção social da identidade do leproso e do processo de sua reintegração à sociedade.Caderno do NEPES, 4, 43–57.Google Scholar
  56. Risseeuw, C. I. (1978).Little things change greatly: A study of social and cultural influences on leprosy patients' receptiveness to modern treatment in West Bukusu, Western Province, Kenya. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Room, R. (1976). Ambivalence as a sociological explanation: The case of cultural explanations of alcohol problems.American Sociological Review, 41, 1047–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Rutnin, M. M. (1983).Transformation of the Thai concepts of aesthetics. Paper no. 13. Bangkok: Thai Khadi Research Institute, Thammasat University.Google Scholar
  60. Sagarin, E. (1975).Deviants and deviance: An introduction to the study of disvalued people and behavior. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  61. Sapir, J. D. (1981). Leper, hyena, and blacksmith in Kujamaat Diola thought.American Ethnologist, 8, 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schneider, H. (1975).Leprosy and other health problems in Hararghe, Ethiopia. n.p.Google Scholar
  63. Schur, E. M. (1979).Interpreting deviance: A sociological introduction. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  64. Shalinsky, A., & Glascock, A. (1988). Killing infants and the aged in nonindustrial societies: Removing the liminal.Social Science Journal, 25, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Siam Outlook. (1938). Kiulungkiang.Siam Outlook, 9, 12–13.Google Scholar
  66. Si Fa (pseud.) (1978).Gert laew pen khon [Born a person]. Bangkok: Hang Hon Suan Jamqat Bamsong San.Google Scholar
  67. Söder, M. (1990). Prejudice or ambivalence? Attitudes toward persons with disabilities.Disability, Handicap and Society, 5, 227–241.Google Scholar
  68. Tambiah, S. J. (1969). Animals are good to think and good to prohibit.Ethnology, 8, 423–459.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, H. (1947).A missionary in Siam, Vol. 1. San Francisco. Typescript at the Payap University Archives, Payap University, Chiang Mai.Google Scholar
  70. Thailand. Department of Public Health. (c.1926).Public health and philanthropic institutions in Siam. Bangkok: Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  71. Turner, V. W. (1969). Liminality and communitas. In V. W. Turner,The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure (pp. 94–131). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  72. Waxler, N. E. (1981). Learning to be a leper: A case study in the social construction of illness. In E. G. Mishler, L. AmaraSingham, S. Hauser, R. Leim, S. Osherson & N. E. Waxler,Social contexts of health, illness and medical care (pp. 169–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wegar, K. (1992). The sociological significance of ambivalence: An example from adoption research.Qualitative Sociology, 15, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yates, O. W. (1911). A unique service.Laos News, 8, 49–52.Google Scholar
  75. Zerubavel, E. (1991).The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liora Navon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Nursing, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations