Skip to main content
Log in

Reconsidering table talk: Critical thoughts on the relationship between sociology, autobiography and self-indulgence

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Those who use autobiographical perspectives in the practice of sociology and related disciplines have noted, with concern, the association of their work with self-indulgence (Devault, 1994; Jackson, 1990; Okely, 1992; Kreiger, 1991). This paper elaborates this concern by directing analytic attention to the nature of the charge of self-indulgence. The paper reads as an autobiographical defense of autobiographical sociology. It uses the naming of my own work as self-involved as a point of departure for explicating the implications of this regulatory practice. The device of irony is used to expose how self-indulgence, as a critique invoking highly insular relations of readership, authorship and subject/object distinction, relies on the conventions of a traditional masculine academic discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannerji, H. (1993). But Who Speaks for Us? Experience and Agency in Conventional Feminist Paradigms. In H. Bannerji, L. Carty, K. Delhi, S. Heald & K. McKenna.Unsettling Relations. The University as a Site of Feminist Struggles. (pp. 67–107). Toronto: Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H., McCall, M. M. & Morris, L. V. (1991) Theatres and Communities: Three Scenes.Social Problems, 36: 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkey, L. (1987).Academic Writing as Social Practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial Truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.)Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. (pp. 1–26). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. & G. E. Marcus. (1986).Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1990). An Iron Man. The Body and Some Contradictions of Hegemonic Masculinity. In M. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.)Sport, Men and the Gender Order. (pp. 83–95). Champaign Ill: Human Kinetics Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1991). Live Fast and Die Young: The Construction of Masculinity among Young Working-Class Men on the Margin of the Labour Market.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 27(2): 141–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1989).Interpretive Biography, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1994). Personal Writing In Social Research. Paper presented at the Qualitative Research Conference, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1990). Talking and Listening from Women's Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis.Social Problems, 17(1): 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (1993). “There are Survivors:’ Telling a Story of Sudden Death.The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4): 711–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, W. (1974).The Liberated Man. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. What is an Author? In J. Harari (Ed.)Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Poststructuralist Criticism. (pp. 141–160). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Gluck, S. & Patai, D. (Eds.) (1991).Women's Words. The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986).The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1987). Is there a Feminist Method? In S. Harding (Ed.)Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. (pp. 1–14). Bloomington: Indiana University Press and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, F. (1992).Beyond Female Masochism: Memory-work and Politics. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1989).Talking Back. Thinking Feminist Thinking Black. Boston: Southend Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1994).Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1990).Unmasking Masculinity. A Critical Autobiography. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, S. (1985). Beyond ‘Subjectivity.’ The Use of the Self in Social Science.Qualitative Sociology, 8(4): 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, S. (1991).Social Science and the Self. Personal Essays on an Art Form. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K. (1991). Com(e) (a)part (m)entalizations. Forming Academic Subject(ivitie)s. Unpublished Master's Thesis. OISE, University of Toronto.

  • McKenna, K. (1993). (Dis)Honouring Father(s). In T. Haddad (Ed.)Men and Masculinities: A Critical Anthology. (pp. 59–75). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K., Peters, E. & Weatherbee, D. (1993). Reconstructuring Masculinities through Autobiography. In T. Haddad (Ed.)Men an Masculinities: A Critical Anthology. (pp. 59–75). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. K. (1991).Getting Personal. Feminist Occasions and Other Autobiographical Acts. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okely, J. (1992). Anthropology and Autobiography: Participatory Experience and Embodied Knowledge. In Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.)Anthropology and Autobiography. (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, M. (1983). Experience and Knowledge.Human Studies, 6:67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Eric. (1993). Table Talk. In T. Haddad (Ed.)Men and Masculinities: A Critical Anthology. (pp. 77–90). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981).The Myth of Masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. & Sawyers, J. (1974).Men and Masculinity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. B. (1984). Identity: Skin Blood Heart. In E. Bulkin, M. B. Pratt & B. SmithYours in Struggle. Three Feminist Perspectives on Anti-semitism and Racism. (pp. 11–63). Brooklyn: Long Haul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1988). The Collective Story: Postmodernism and the Writing of Sociology.Sociological Focus, 21(3):199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. (1993). Poetics, Dramatics, and Transgressive Validity: The Case of the Skipped Line.The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4):695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, V. J. (1989).Rediscovering Masculinity: Reason, Language and Sexuality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1987).The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990).The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1990a).Texts, Facts, and Feminity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, E. V. (1988).Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1991). Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography? In S. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.)Women's Words. The Feminist Practice of Oral History. (pp. 111–119). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1993). On Auto/Biography in Sociology.Sociology, 7(1):41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh, Minh-ha T. (1989).Woman Native Other. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990).Schoolgirl Fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherbee, D. (1993). ‘You Gotta Learn to Take Care of Yourself’. In T. Haddad (Ed.)Men and Masculinities: A Critical Anthology. (pp. 91–103). Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westkott, M. (1979). Feminist Criticism of the Social Sciences.Harvard Education Review, 49(4):422–430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mykhalovskiy, E. Reconsidering table talk: Critical thoughts on the relationship between sociology, autobiography and self-indulgence. Qual Sociol 19, 131–151 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393251

Key words

Navigation