Skip to main content
Log in

Studying one's own in the Middle East: Negotiating gender and self-other dynamics in the field

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article uses examples of the experience I had in the field as an indigenous researcher in Turkey in order to problematize claims to knowledge. I contend that for researchers who are positioned as relative “insiders,” whether indigenous or bicultural, such aspects of the researcher identity as gender, class, professional and relationship status are made especially salient, perhaps even more so in Middle Eastern contexts. I also argue that while indigenous status can be both empowering and restricting, the insider/outsider position can be employed as a useful vantage point for “rethinking the familiar.” I discuss with examples how this position informed my researcher role and my perspective on what is traditional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1988) “Fieldwork of a ‘dutiful’ daughter.” In S. Altorki and El-Solh (Eds.)Arab women in the field. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Lughod, L. (1993).Writing women's worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acker, J., Barry, K. & Esseveld, J. (1983) “Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research.”Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 4, 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar, J. (1981) “Insider research: An ethnography of a debate.” In D. A. Messerschmidt (ed.),Anthropologists at home in North America: Methods and issues in the study of one's own society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altorki, S. (1988) “At home in the field.” In S. Altorki and F. El-Solh (Eds.)Arab women in the field. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. M. (1982) “Anthropology: A review essay.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 8, 2, 437–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavnani, K. (1993) “Tracing the contours: Feminist research and feminist objectivity.”Women's Studies International Forum, 16, 2, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertaux-Wiame, I. (1981) “The life-history approach to the study of internal migration.” In D. Bertaux (Ed.)Biography and society: The life-history approach in the social sciences. Sage Publications.

  • Bolak, H. (1995) “Towards a conceptualization of marital power dynamics: Women breadwinners and working class households in Turkey.” In S. Tekeli (Ed)Women in modern Turkish society. N.J.: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. (1993) “Observing the other: Reflections on anthropological fieldwork.”Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42, 2, 2, 613–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1989) “Seventies questions for thirties women: Gender and generation in a study of early women psychoanalysts.” In N. Chodorow, (1989)Feminism and Psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. H. (1983) “Variations on themes of male and female: Reflections on gender bias in fieldwork in rural Greece.”Women's Studies, 10, 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1986) “Introduction: Partial truths.” In J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus (Eds.)Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (1986) “Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought.”Social Problems, 33, “6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. K. (1983) “Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork.”Qualitative Sociology, 6, 3, 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, P. (1986) “Gender and personhood: Turkish jewish proverbs and the politics of reputation.”Women's Studies International Forum, 9, 3, 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, E. A. (1985) “Catharsis and creation. The everyday narratives of baladi women of Cairo.”Anthropological Quarterly. Self and Society in the Middle East (Special Issue), 172–181.

  • Fine, M. (1989) “Coping with rape: Perspectives on consciousness.” In R. Unger (Ed.)Representations: Social constructions of gender. Amityville: Baywood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M. & Gordon, S. M. (1989) “Feminist transformations of/despite psychology.” In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (eds.)Gender and thought: psychological perspectives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freilich, M. (Ed.) (1977)Marginal natives: Anthropologists at work. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, E. (1970) “Fieldwork in a Greek village.” In P. Golde (Ed.),Women in the field. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannage, C. (1986)Double day, double bind: Women garment workers. Toronto: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, P. (ed.) (1986)Women in the field: anthropological perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1988) “Writing culture, writing feminism: The poetics and politics of experimental ethnography.”Inscriptions, 3/4, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988) “Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective.”Feminist Studies, 14, 3, 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991)Whose science, whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. (1989) “The problem of gender in family therapy theory.” In M. Goldrick, C. M. Anderson and F. Walsh (Eds.)Women in families: A framework for family therapy. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1988) “Gender and fieldwork.”Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 6, 611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (1988) “Feminization, familism, self and politics.” In S. Altorki and F. El-Solh (Eds.)Arab women in the field. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, S. (1993) “Gender and relationality among Arab families in Lebanon.”Feminist Studies, 19, 3, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawar, Amal (1991) “The intersection of gender and politics: Revising a political science course.”Women's Studies International Forum, 14, 305–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikumura, A. (1981)Through harsh winters. Novato, CA: Chandler and Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, S. (1985) “Beyond ‘subjectivity’: The use of the self in social science.”Qualitative Sociology, 8, 4, 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. (1987)The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascia-Lees, F. Sharpe, P. & Cohen, C. B. (1989) “The postmodernist turn in anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15, 11, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsy, S. (1988) “Fieldwork in my Egyptian homeland.” In S. Altorki and F. El-Solh (Eds.)Arab women in the field. New York: Syracuse University Press.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1984) “Native anthropologists.”American Ethnologist, 11, 3, 584–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A. (1988) “Colonialism and modernity: feminist re-presentations of women in non-Western societies.”Inscriptions, 3/4, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. (1984) “Theory in anthropology since the sixties.”Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History, 26, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlee, M. B. (1979) “Psychology and women.”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 1, 521–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1983) “Experiential analysis: A contribution to feminist research.” In G. Bowles and D. Klein (Eds.)Theories of Women's Studies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1984)On becoming a social scientist. Transaction Books.

  • Reinharz, S. (1994) “Rethinking the familiar: Developing a healthy distrust of implicit messages, presumed fairness and benign neutrality. Distinguished Publication Award Invited Address, Association of Women in Psychology.

  • Ribbens, J. (1989) “Interviewing-An ‘unnatural situation’?”Women's Studies International Forum, 12, 6, 579–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1983) “Introduction: The problem of bias in androcentric and feminist anthropology.”Women's Studies, 10.

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. & Clark, M. (Eds.) (1983)Women's Studies, 10. Special Issue.

  • Sherif, C. (1979) “Bias in psychology.” In J. Sherman & T. Beck (Eds.)The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1987) “The everyday world as a problematic: A feminist methodology.” In D. Smith (Ed.)The everyday world as a problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. (1988) “Can there be feminist ethnography?”Women's Studies International Forum, 11, 1, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J. B. & Greer, L. S. (1981) “Ethnographers in their own cultures: Two appalachian cases.”Human Organization, 40, 2, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1987) “An awkward relationship: The case of feminism and anthropology.”Signs: Journal of Women in Cultural and Society, 12, 2, 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. A. (1988)Gender issues in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, T. L. & Conaway, M. E. (Eds.) (1988)Self, sex and gender in cross-cultural fieldwork. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolak, H.C. Studying one's own in the Middle East: Negotiating gender and self-other dynamics in the field. Qual Sociol 19, 107–130 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393250

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393250

Key words

Navigation