Abstract
This paper explores the ways in which geo-political forces can shape doing, interpreting, and representing ethnographic field work. Using my field work in a law collective in Havana, Cuba between 1989 and 1994 as a starting point, I consider how macro-social relationship—in this case 30 years of political hostility between the U.S. and Cuban governments—can inscribe themselves on the micro-social relations between ethnographers and informants in the field, and ethnographers and their audiences at home. The combination of geo-political tensions and reflexive attempts to discern the impact of these tensions on my field work generated, what I term, disciplinary anxietyand discursive anxiety.I consider how anxieties became part of my reflexive routines in the field, shaped my interactions with Cubans, colored my attempts to interpret those interactions, and affected my framing of those interpretations for audiences at home. I suggest that reflexivity in fieldwork must be sensitive, not only to the standpoints imbedded in the field worker's biography, but also to the way in which macro-political processes enter into the biographies of field workers, their informants, and their audiences, and influence the interactions among them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Lughod, L. 1990. “Can there be a feminist ethnography.”Women and Performance. 5(1):7–27.
Agee, P. 1976.Inside the Company: CIA Diary. New York: Bantam Books.
Alarcon, R. 1991. Speech before the United Nations General Assembly. November 13.
Asad, T. (ed.). 1973.Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ootheca Press.
Bordo, S. 1990. “Feminism, Postmodernism, and gender skepticism.” inFeminism/Postmodernism. Nicholson, L. (ed.) New York: Routledge. pp. 133–156.
Bruner, E. M. 1986. “Ethnography as narrative,” in V. Turner and E. Bruner (eds.)The Anthropology of Experience. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 139–148.
Burawoy, M. et al. 1991.Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.) 1986.Writing Culture. Berkeley; University of California Press.
Clifford, J. 1988.The Predicament of Culture. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Crapanzano, V. 1986.Hermes Dilemma. “Hermes dilemma: the masking of subversion in ethnographic description”. in Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. (eds.)Writing Culture. Berkely: University of California Press, pp. 51–76.
de Certeu, M. 1984. (Rendell, S., trans.)The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
D'Estefano, M. (ed.) 1985. Agresiones de Estados Unidos a Cuba Revolucionaria. Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.
Dubisch, J. 1995.In a Different Place. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ellis, C. 1994. “Emotional and ethical quagmires in returning to the field.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association.
Foucault, M. 1979.Discipline and Punish, New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. 1980.The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
Halperin, M. 1981.The Taming of Fidel Castro. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Harding, S. (ed.) 1987.Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Karp, I. and Kendall, M. 1982. “Reflexivity in field work.” inExplaining Human Behavior: Consciousness, Human Action, and Social Structure, Secord, P. (ed.) Beverley Hills: Sage, pp. 249–273.
Lutz, C. A. and Lial Abu-Lughod. 1990.Language and the Politics of Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mascia-Lees, F., Sharpe, P. and Cohen, C. B. 1989. “The postmodernist turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a feminist perspective.”Signs Vol. 15 No. 1; 7–33.
Marcus, G. E. 1994. “What Comes (Just) After ‘Post’? The Case of Ethnography,” in N. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln,Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 563–574.
Meyerhoff, B. and Ruby, J. 1982, “Introduction,” J. Ruby (ed.),A Crack in the Mirror. Philadelphia University Press, pp. 1–35.
Michalowski, R. 1985.Order, Law, and Crime, New York: Random House.
Michalowski, R. and Zatz, M. 1990. “The Cuban second economy in perspective,” in (Los, ed.)The Second Economy in Marxist States New York: MacMillan, pp. 141–156.
Okely, J. 1992. “Anthropology and autobiography: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge,” in J. Okely and H. Callaway (eds.)Anthropology and Autobiography, New York: Rougtledge, pp. 1–28.
Rabinow, P. 1977.Reflections of Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rabinow, P. 1986. “Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in ethnography.” in Clifford and Marcus (eds.)Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 234–261.
Reinharz, Shulamit, 1979.On Becoming a Social Scientist, San Francisco: Josey Bass.
Reinharz, Shulamit, 1992.Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford.
Richardson, 1975. Quoted in Karp, I, and Kendall, M. 1982. “Reflexivity in field work.” inExplaining Human Behavior: Consciousness, Human Action, and Social Structure, Second, P. (ed.) Beverley Hills: Sage, p. 258.
Rosaldo, R. 1989.Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Turner, V. and Edward M. Bruner (eds.) 1986.The Anthropology of Experience, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
U. S. Congress. 1976.Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Van Maanen, John, 1988.Tales of the Field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wasserfall, R. 1993. “Reflexivity, Feminism and Difference.”Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 16, No. 1:23:40.
White, James B. 1984.When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitution of Language, Character, and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zimbalist, A. 1990. “Does the Economy Work.”NACLA: Report on the Americas Vol. 24, No. 2:16–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michalowski, R.J. Ethnography and anxiety: Field work and reflexivity in the vortex of U.S.-Cuban relations. Qual Sociol 19, 59–82 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393248
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393248