Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational reputation and constitutional constraints: An application to religious denominations

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constitutional economics may be defined as the study of constraints chosen by cooperative groups. In this paper, the scope of constitutional economics is extended by an examination of the constitutions and rules that govern seven of the eight largest U.S. Christian denominations. This examination of church constitutions reveals constitutional provisions and church rules that protect denominational reputation by preserving doctrinal integrity and constraining the behavior of local churches, clergy, and individual members. By protecting their reputations, religious denominations may increase their appeal to current or prospective members or both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G.M. (1988) “Mr. Smith and the Preachers: The Economics of Religion in theWealth of Nations.”Journal of Political Economy 96: 1066–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1990) “The Domain of Constitutional Economics.”Constitutional Political Economy 1: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Book of Discipline of the United Methodist Church 1988. Nashville, Tennessee: The United Methodist Publishing House.

  • Clarkson, K. (1972) “Some Implications of Property Rights in Hospital Management.”Journal of Law and Economics 15: 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coriden, J.A., Green, T.J., and Heintschel, D.E. (eds) (1985)The Code of Canon Law: A Text and Commentary. New York: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution (1988) The Southern Baptist Convention.

  • Constitutions, Bylaws, and Continuing Resolutions. (1991) The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

  • Constitutions & Canons for the Government of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States. (1988) The Episcopal Church.

  • The Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U. S. A.) Part II Book of Order. (1988) Louisville, KY: The Office of the General Assembly.

  • Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983) “Separation of Ownership and Control.”Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handbook of The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod. (1986) St. Louis, MO: The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.

  • Hansmann, H. (1981) “Nonprofit Enterprise in the Performing Arts.”Bell Journal of Economics 12: 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet, C.H. Jr., and Jones, A.M. (eds) (1991)Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches 1991. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E. (1986) “How Nonprofits Grow: A Model.” In: Rose-Ackerman (ed)The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klien, B., and Leffler, K. (1981) “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.”Journal of Political Economy 89: 614–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipford, J.W. (1992) “Group Size and the Free-Rider Hypothesis: An Examination of New Evidence.” Unpublished manuscript. Presbyterian College.

  • Melton, J.G. (1989)The Encyclopedia of American Religions. 3d ed. Detroit: Gale Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, J. (1970) “Towards a Theory of Nonprofit Institutions: An Economic Model of a Hospital.”American Economic Review 60: 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. Jr. (1971)Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldeine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M., and Redish, M. (1973) “The Not-for-Profit Hospital as a Physicians' Cooperative.”American Economic Review 63: 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J.E. (ed) (1992) “Convention Wrap Up.”Baptist Courier 124: 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (1986) “The Revealed Objective Functions of Nonprofit Firms.”Rand Journal of Economics 17: 508–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, C.B. (1980) “Marketing Mix Decision Rules for Nonprofit Organizations.”Research in Marketing 3: 191–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lipford, J. Organizational reputation and constitutional constraints: An application to religious denominations. Constit Polit Econ 3, 343–357 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393140

Keywords

Navigation