Abstract
Contractualists seek to publicly justify moral principles, but it seems doubtful that a set of specific principles or policies can be definitively justified. In this sense, the contractualist project has an indeterminate result: the precise content of liberal morality is open to reasonable dispute. Liberal citizens thus find themselves disagreeing about the demands of liberal morality. They require, as Locke argued, an umpire to resolve their disputes. This paper analyzes what is required of such an umpire, and then employs a four-stage argument to show that constitutional representative democracy is the uniquely justified umpiring procedure for resolving these disputes. Democratic politics, on this view, is the continuation of ethical dispute by other means.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, B.A. (1980)Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Arrow, K.J. (1963)Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd edition. New, Haven: Yale University Press.
Barry, B. (1989)Theories of Social Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Beitz, C. (1989)Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Braybrooke, D. (1987) “Social Contract Theory's Fanciest Flight.”Ethics 97: 750–61.
Brink, D.O. (1989)Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock (1962)The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Chapman, J.W. (1980) “Justice, Freedom and Property.” In: J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds)NOMOS XXII: Property. New York: New York University Press: 289–324.
Coleman, J.L. (1988) “Democracy and Social Choice.” In:Markets, Morals and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 290–310.
D'Agostino, F.B. (1981) “The Ethos of Games.”Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8: 7–18.
D'Agostino, F.B. (1989) “Adjudication as an Epistemological Concept.”Synthese 79: 231–56.
D'Agostino, F.B. (1990a) “The Aimless Rationality of Science.”International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4.
D'Agostino, F.B. (1990b) “Ethical Pluralism and the Role of Opposition in Democratic Politics.”Monist 73.
D'Agostino, F.B. (1991) “The Idea and Ideal of Public Justification.”Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Dahl, R. (1989)Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Elster, J. (1989) “The Market and the Forum.” In: Jon Elster and Aanund Hylland (eds)Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 103–32.
Ely, J.H. (1980)Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ewin, R.E. (1987)Liberty, Community and Justice. Totwa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Friedman, R.B. (1973) “On the Concept of Authority in Political Philosophy.” In: Richard E. Flathman (ed)Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. New York: Macmillan: 121–46.
Gaus, G.F. (1989) “A Contractual Justification of Redistributive Capitalism.” In: J.W. Chapman and J.R. Pennock (eds)NOMOS XXXI: Markets and Justice. New York: New York University Press: 89–121.
Gaus, G.F. (1990)Value and Justification: The Foundations of Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gauthier, D. (1986)Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Golding, M. (1979) “The Nature of Compromise: A Preliminary Inquiry.” In: J.R. Pennock and J.W. Chapman (eds)NOMOS XXI: Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics. New York: New York University Press: 3–25.
Gray, J. (1990)Liberalisms. London: Routledge.
Hampton, J. (1986)Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, F.A. (1976)Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol 2:The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Head, J.G. (1974)Public Goods and Public Welfare. Durham: Duke University Press.
Letwin, S.R. (1989) “The Morality of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” In: G. Brennan and L.E. Lomasky (eds)Politics and Process: New Essays in Democratic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 221–34.
Locke, J. [1960 (1690)]Second Treatise of Government. In: Peter Laslett (ed)Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lomasky, L.E. (1987)Persons, Rights and the Moral Community. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, C.B. (1977)The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, J.S. [1977 (1859)] “Thoughts on Parliamentary Reform.” In: J.M. Robson (ed)Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: Vol. XIX.
Mill, J.S. (1861, 1977)Considerations on Representative Government. In: J.M. Robson (ed)Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press: Vol. XIX.
Narveson, J. (1988)The Libertarian Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Nelson, W.N. (1980)On Justifying Democracy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Nelson, W.N. (1989) “Evaluating the Institutions of Liberal Democracy.” In: G. Brennan and L.E. Lomasky (eds)Politics and Process: New Essays in Democratic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 60–77.
Norman, R. (1987)Free and Equal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974)Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Peters, R. (1967) “Authority.” In: A. Quinton (ed)Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 82–96.
Rawls, J. (1971)A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1980) “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.”Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–72.
Raz, J. (1986)The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Riker, W. (1988)Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL.: Waveland Press.
Scanlon, T.M. (1982) “Contractualism and Utilitarianism.” In: A.K. Sen and B. Williams (eds)Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 103–28.
Sen, A.K. (1970)Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Shearmur, J. (1990) “Epistemological Limits of the State: Reflections on Popper'sOpen Society.”Political Studies 38: 116–25.
Singer, P. (1973)Democracy and Disobedience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Snowiss, S. (1990)Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sugden, R. (1990) “Contractarianism and Norms.”Ethics 100: 768–86.
Wagner, R.E. and J.D. Gwartney (1988) “Public Choice and Constitutional Order.” In: J.D. Gwartney and R.E. Wagner (eds)Public Choice and Constitutional Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 29–56.
Watt, E.D. (1982)Authority. London: Croom-Helm.
Williamson, O.E. (1985)The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to thank Fred D'Agostino, William Nelson and Jonathan Riley for their very helpful written comments. I also greatly benefitted from discussions with Julian Lamont, Loren Lomasky, Philip Pettit, Jeremy Shearmur and Stuart Warner and from Daniel Shapiro's response to an earlier version of this paper. My thanks too to the journal's readers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaus, G.F. Public justification and democratic adjudication. Constit Polit Econ 2, 251–281 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393132
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393132