Skip to main content
Log in

On the complexity of the classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups of rank two

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Adams, S. R. &Kechris, A. S., Linear algebraic groups and countable Borel equivalence relations.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 13 (2000), 909–943.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, S. R. &Spatzier, R. J., Kazhdan groups, cocycles and trees.Amer. J. Math., 112 (1990), 271–287.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baer, R., Abelian groups without elements of finite order.Duke Math. J., 3 (1937), 68–122.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Connes, A., Feldman, J. &Weiss, B., An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 1 (1981), 431–450.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dougherty, R., Jackson, S. &Kechris, A. S., The structure of hyperfinite Borel equivalence relations.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 341 (1994), 193–225.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman, J. &Moore, C. C., Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology and von Neumann algebras, I.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 234 (1977), 289–324.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs, L.,Infinite Abelian Groups, Vol. II. Pure Appl. Math., 36-II. Academic Press, New York-London, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hjorth, G., Around nonclassifiability for countable torsion-free abelian groups, inAbelian Groups and Modules (Dublin, 1998), pp. 269–292. Trends Math., Birkhäuser, Basel, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hjorth, G. &Kechris, A. S., Borel equivalence relations and classifications of countable models.Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 82 (1996), 221–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, S., Kechris, A. S. &Louveau, A., Countable Borel equivalence relations.J. Math. Log., 2 (2002), 1–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kechris, A. S., Countable sections for locally compact group actions.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 12 (1992), 283–295.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. —, Amenable versus hyperfinite Borel equivalence relations.J. Symbolic Logic, 58 (1993), 894–907.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. —, On the classification problem for rank 2 torsion-free abelian groups.J. London Math. Soc. (2), 62 (2000), 437–450.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Król, M.,The Automorphism Groups and Endomorphism Rings of Torsion-Free Abelian Groups of Rank Two. Dissertationes Math. (Rozprawy Mat.), 55. PWN, Warsaw, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurosh, A. G., Primitive torsionsfreie abelsche Gruppen vom endlichen Range.Ann. of Math. (2), 38 (1937), 175–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Malcev, A. I., Torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank.Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 4 (1938), 45–68 (Russian).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Margulis, G. A.,Discrete Subgroups of Semisimple Lie Groups. Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 17. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce, R. S.,Associative Algebras. Graduate Texts in Math., 88. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rotman, J. J.,An Introduction to Homological Algebra. Pure Appl. Math., 85. Academic Press, New York-London, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Serre, J.-P.,Arbres, amalgames, SL 2. Astérisque, 46. Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, S., The classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups of finite rank.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 16 (2003), 233–258.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, S. &Velickovic, B., On the complexity of the isomorphism relation for finitely generated groups.J. Algebra, 217 (1999), 352–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. —, On the complexity of the isomorphism relation for fields of finite transcendence degree.J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 159 (2001), 347–363.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wagon, S.,The Banach-Tarski Paradox. Encyclopedia Math. Appl., 24. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmer, R.,Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups. Monographs Math., 81. Birkhäuser, Basel, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. —, Kazhdan groups acting on compact manifolds.Invent. Math., 75 (1984), 425–436.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. —, Groups generating transversals to semisimple Lie group actions.Israel J. Math., 73 (1991), 151–159.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research partially supported by NSF Grants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, S. On the complexity of the classification problem for torsion-free abelian groups of rank two. Acta Math. 189, 287–305 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392844

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392844

Keywords

Navigation