Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosing acute pancreatitis and assessing its severity by enhanced computed tomography: Correlations with Ranson’s assessment method

  • Topics
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Using the criteria of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare for evaluation of the severity of acute pancreatitis based on computed tomography (CT), we assessed the CT grade of 104 patients with acute pancreatitis. The CT assessments were compared with the status of acute pancreatitis in these patients, assessed using Ranson’s system of objective prognostic signs by which acute pancreatitis is classified as “mild”, “moderate”, or “severe.” A CT grade of I corresponded to Ranson’s mild category; CT grades II and III corresponded to moderate, and CT grades IV and V corresponded to servere. Some patients with a CT grade of IV or V died, whereas none of the patients with CT grades of I, II, or III succumbed to the condition. This study confirmed that enhanced CT provides an accurate CT grading of acute pancreatitis. We emphasize the necessity of using enhanced CT for determining the severity of acute pancreatitis, not only on admission but also during hospitalization if the patient’s condition should become exacerbated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ranson JHC, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, Fink SD, Spencer FC (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139:69–81

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bank S, Wise L, Gersten M (1983) Risk factors in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 78:637–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegelman SS, Copeland BE, Saba GP (1980) CT of fluid collection associated with pancreatitis. AJR 134:1121–1132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takada T, Yasuda H, Uchiyama K, Hasegawa H, Nagai J (1988) CT score and severity of acute pancreatitis. Int Surg 73:94–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yasuda H, Takada T, Uchiyama K, Hasegawa H (1994) Severity by X-ray CT and management of acute pancreatitis (in Japanese) Gekachiryo (Surgical Therapy) 71:720–727

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ, Zelch MG, Meany TF, Boller M, Gonzalez L, Jelden GL (1976) Computed tomography of the pancreas. Radiology 120:589–595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto M, Saito Y (1988) Cooperative survey of severe acute pancreatitis in Japan (in Japanese). Tan To Sui (J Biliary Tract Pancreas) 9:1669–1683

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grabbe E, Dammann HG, Heller M (1982) Wert der Computertomographic fur die Prognose der akuten Pancreatitis. Fortschr Röntgenster 136:534–537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ranson JHC, Balthazar BE, Caccavale R, Cooper M (1985) Computed tomography and the prediction of pancreatic abscess in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg 201:656–665

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Sarr MG (1991) CT of acute pancreatitis: Correlation between lack of contrast enhancement and pancreatic necrosis. AJR 156:93–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawson TL (1983) Acute pancreatitis and its complications: Computed tomography and sonography. Radiol Clin North Am 21:495–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Yasuda, H., Takada, T., Amano, H. et al. Diagnosing acute pancreatitis and assessing its severity by enhanced computed tomography: Correlations with Ranson’s assessment method. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 3, 234–240 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391021

Key words

Navigation