Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of prognostic score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Part II. Prospective study

  • Topics
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

From July 1994 to October 1995, a prospective study was conducted at the First Department of Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, to assess the usefulness of a prognosis score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Ten patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated, and all had good outcomes there were no deaths. In selecting early treatment according to the scoring of severity, we suggest that when the prognosis score is 2 or more and the APACHE II score is 8 or more, gallstone pancreatitis should first be treated by biliary drainage, and non-gallstone pancreatitis by peritoneal lavage. When infected pancreatic necrosis is exhibited, surgery is indicated. Conservative therapy should be selected when the prognosis score is less than 2 and the APACHE II score is less than 8. We found that the prognosis score was useful for both determining the severity of acute pancreatitis and in selecting appropriate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Larvin M, McMahon M (1989) APACHE II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2:201–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roumen RMH, Scher TJ, de Boer HHM, Goris RJ (1992) Scoring systems for predicting outcome in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. Eur J Surg 158:167–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saito Y (1991) Ministry of Health and Welfare, Therapeutics, and Disease Control Selection Collection (ed) Compendium of methods of treating intractable diseases

  5. Kawarada Y, Iwata M, Takahashi H, Isaji S, Mizumoto R (1991) Surgery in acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 9:59–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranson JHC, Rifkind KJM, Roses DF (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61:443–451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naganuma T, Kawarada Y (1994) Scoring of the severity and selection of early treatment for acute pancreatitis. Surg Ther 72:639–645

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley EL III, Allen KA (1991) Management of necrotizing pancreatitis: Results of prospective longitudinal trial. Am J Surg 161:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rever HA Editorial (1986) Surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 91:479–482

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, Bailey IA, James D, Fossard DP (1988) Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet 2:979–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naganuma T, Kawarada Y, Mizumoto R (1996) Evaluation of prognostic score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Part I. Retrospective study. J Hep Bil Paner Surg 3:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Higashiguchi, T., Kawarada, Y., Naganuma, T. et al. Evaluation of prognostic score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Part II. Prospective study. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 3, 216–219 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391018

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391018

Key words

Navigation