Abstract
From July 1994 to October 1995, a prospective study was conducted at the First Department of Surgery, Mie University School of Medicine, to assess the usefulness of a prognosis score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Ten patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated, and all had good outcomes there were no deaths. In selecting early treatment according to the scoring of severity, we suggest that when the prognosis score is 2 or more and the APACHE II score is 8 or more, gallstone pancreatitis should first be treated by biliary drainage, and non-gallstone pancreatitis by peritoneal lavage. When infected pancreatic necrosis is exhibited, surgery is indicated. Conservative therapy should be selected when the prognosis score is less than 2 and the APACHE II score is less than 8. We found that the prognosis score was useful for both determining the severity of acute pancreatitis and in selecting appropriate treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829
Larvin M, McMahon M (1989) APACHE II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2:201–204
Roumen RMH, Scher TJ, de Boer HHM, Goris RJ (1992) Scoring systems for predicting outcome in acute hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis. Eur J Surg 158:167–171
Saito Y (1991) Ministry of Health and Welfare, Therapeutics, and Disease Control Selection Collection (ed) Compendium of methods of treating intractable diseases
Kawarada Y, Iwata M, Takahashi H, Isaji S, Mizumoto R (1991) Surgery in acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 9:59–66
Ranson JHC, Rifkind KJM, Roses DF (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61:443–451
Naganuma T, Kawarada Y (1994) Scoring of the severity and selection of early treatment for acute pancreatitis. Surg Ther 72:639–645
Bradley EL III, Allen KA (1991) Management of necrotizing pancreatitis: Results of prospective longitudinal trial. Am J Surg 161:19–25
Rever HA Editorial (1986) Surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 91:479–482
Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, Bailey IA, James D, Fossard DP (1988) Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet 2:979–983
Naganuma T, Kawarada Y, Mizumoto R (1996) Evaluation of prognostic score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Part I. Retrospective study. J Hep Bil Paner Surg 3:210–215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Higashiguchi, T., Kawarada, Y., Naganuma, T. et al. Evaluation of prognostic score based on the Japanese criteria for the severity of acute pancreatitis. Part II. Prospective study. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 3, 216–219 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391018
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391018