Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of trends in tributyltin concentrations among three monitoring programs in the United States

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of three national monitoring programs in the United States (U.S.) that measure concentrations of tributyltin (TBT) are compared. Regional and site comparisons are made of changes in TBT concentrations since passage of the Organotin Antifouling Paint Control Act (OAPCA) in 1988. The monitoring programs compared are the U.S. LongTerm Monitoring Program conducted by a consortium of tributyltin manufacturers, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Status and Trends Mussel Watch project, and the U.S. Navy's TBT monitoring program. All of the monitoring results demonstrate declining TBT concentrations over time. These declines have occurred rapidly (within a few years) and are considerable (56%–71% decrease in TBT concentrations in water, 47%–55% decrease in sediments, and 40%–82% decrease in bivalve tissues). Mean TBT concentrations in water are generally below the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency marine chronic water quality criterion of 10ng/L. These results indicate that the OAPCA has been effective in reducing TBT concentrations in the aquatic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Congress (1988) Organotin antifouling paint control act of 1988. H.R. 2210-3. One Hundredth Congress of United States of America, Second Session. Washington, D.C.

  2. Beaumont AR, Budd MD (1984) High mortality of the larvae of the common mussel at low concentrations of tributyltin. Mar Pollut Bull 15:402–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Champ MA, Bleil DF (1988) Research needs concerning organotin compounds used in antifouling paints in coastal environments. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA. Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  4. Waldock MJ, Thain JE (1983) Shell thickening inCrassostrea gigas: Organotin antifouling or sediment induced? Mar Pollut Bull 14:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. EPA (1986) Data call-in notice for data on tributyltins in paint antifoulants. EPA, Office of Pesticides Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Unger MA, Maclntyre WG, Greaves J et al (1986) Determination of butyltins in natural waters by flame photometric detection of hexyl derivatives with mass spectrometric detection. Chemosphere 15(4):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seligman PF, Grovhoug JG, Fransham RL et al (1990) U.S. Navy statutory monitoring of tributyltin in selected U.S. harbors annual report: 1989. Naval Ocean Systems Center Technical Report 1346, San Diego

  8. Wade TL, Garcia-Romero B, Brooks JM (1991) Oysters as biomonitors of butyltins in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Environ Res 32:233–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Uhler AD, Durell GS, Steinhauer WG et al (1993) Tributyltin levels in bivalve molluses from the east and west coasts of the United States: Results from the 1988–1990 National Status and Trends Mussel Watch projec. Environ Toxicol Chem 12:139–153

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. EPA (1991) Ambient aquatic life water quality criteria for tributyltin. Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratories, Duluth and Narragansett

    Google Scholar 

  11. NOAA (1989) A summary of data on tissue contamination from the first three years (1986–1988) of the Mussel Watch Project: Progress report. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 49, U.S. Department of Commerce, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, D., Brancato, M.S. & Bennett, H.J. Comparison of trends in tributyltin concentrations among three monitoring programs in the United States. J Mar Sci Technol 1, 230–238 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390799

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390799

Key words

Navigation