Plant and Soil

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 31–34 | Cite as

Azospirillum affects Eh and potential denitrification in a soil

  • A. Pidello
  • L. Menendez
  • R. Lensi
Research Article


The effect of inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense (strain 7001) on soil Eh under anaerobic conditions (N2 flux) was examined during 144 h at 26°C and 230 h at 18°C. The Eh values of the control (not inoculated) soil decreased to approximately 80 or 140 mV in both cases, whereas after 24 h of anaerobic incubation, the Eh of theAzospirillum-inoculated soil remained at higher values. After 144 and 230 h of anaerobic incubation, the denitrifying activity (measured in anaerobiosis with excess of e- acceptor and donor) in the inoculated soil was seven and three times lower respectively, than in the non-inoculated soil. This indicates thatAzospirillum may affect the soil Eh and consequently any highly Eh-dependent microbial activity, such as denitrification.

Key words

Azospirillum brasilense denitrifying activity soil redox potential 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baldani V L D, Alvarez M Ade B, Baldani J I and Döbereiner J 1986 Establishment of inoculatedAzospirillum spp in the rhizosphere and in roots of field grown wheat and sorghum. Plant and Soil 90, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashan Y and Levanony H 1990 Current status ofAzospirillum inoculation technology:Azospirillum as a challenge for agriculture. Can. J. Microbiol. 36, 591–601.Google Scholar
  3. Firestone MK 1982 Biological denitrificationIn Nitrogen in agricultural Soils. Ed. F JStevenson. Agronomy monograph 22, 289–326, American Society for Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Glinski J and Stepniewski W 1985 Soil Aereation and its Role for Plants. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  5. Halsall D M and Gibson A H 1986 Comparison of two Cellulomonas strains and their interaction withAzospirillum brasilense in degradation of wheat straw and associated nitrogen fixation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51, 855–861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. INTA 1979 Carta de Suelos de la República Argentina Hoja 3360–19, Casilda, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  7. Pacovsky R S 1988 Influence of inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense andGlomus fasciculatum on sorghum nutrition. Plant and Soil 110, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Patrick W H 1978 Critique of ‘Measurement and prediction of anaerobiosis in soil’ by Stolzy L M and Flühler H.In Nitrogen in the Environment, Vol 1. Eds. D RNielsen and J GMc Donald. Academic Press, New York, 499 p.Google Scholar
  9. Pidello A, Lensi R, Chapo G, Lescure C and Gamard P 1989 Influence de l'inoculation d'Azospirillum sur le potentiel d'oxydo-reduction du sol.In Actes Colloque ‘Dynamique des Populations microbiennes dans le Sol’. Société Française de Microbiologie, Lyon, pp 64–68.Google Scholar
  10. Sarig S, Kapulnik Y and Okon Y 1986 Effect ofAzospirillum inoculation on nitrogen fixation and growth of several winter legumes. Plant and Soil 90, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmidt W, Martin P, Omay S H and Bangerth F 1988 Influence ofAzospirillum brasilense on nodulation of legumes.In Azospirillum. IV. Genetics, Physiology, Ecology. Ed. WKlingmüller. pp 92–100. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  12. Subba Rao N S, Tilak K V B R and Singh C S 1985 Synergistic effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas andAzospirillum brasilense on the growth of barley in pots. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 17, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Turner F T and Patrick Jr W H 1968 Chemical changes in waterlogged soils as a results of oxygen depletionIn Int. Soc. Soil Sci. Trans. 9th (Adelaide, Aust) 4, 53–65.Google Scholar
  14. Yoshinari T, Hynes R and Knowles R 1977 Acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reduction and measurement of denitrification and nitrogen fixation in soil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 9, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zehnder A J B and Stumm W 1988 Geochemistry and biogeochemistry of anaerobic habitats.In Biology of anaerobic Microorganisms. Ed. A J BZehnder. pp 1–38. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  16. ZoBell C E 1946 Studies on the redox potential of marine sediments. Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. 30, 477–513.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Pidello
    • 1
  • L. Menendez
    • 1
  • R. Lensi
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratorio Química Biológica I, FCV-Consejo de InvestigacionesUniversidad Nacional de RosarioCasilda, (Pcia. de Santa Fe)Argentina
  2. 2.Laboratoire d'Ecologie Microbienne, URA CNRS 1450Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, IASBSEVilleurbanneFrance

Personalised recommendations