Skip to main content
Log in

Defining disability—A philosophical approach

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. J. Morris,Pride Against Prejudice (London: The Women's Press, 1991), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Söder, “Prejudice or ambivalence?”,Disability, Handicap and Society 5/3 (1990), 227–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Barnes,Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination (London: Hurst and Co., 1991), 58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. . at 96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. . at 96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Massie,Disabled People and Social Justice (London: IPPR, 1994), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. . at 122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. . at 148.

    Google Scholar 

  9. . at 180.

    Google Scholar 

  10. . at 206.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cited by Barnes,. at 5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. . at 24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. . at 6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. . at 6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I am very grateful toJonathan Glover, Brian Smart and Stephen Wilkinson for their valuable comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hull, R. Defining disability—A philosophical approach. Res Publica 4, 199–210 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390098

Keywords

Navigation