Skip to main content
Log in

Reparsing and essentialism

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cocchiarella, Nino, “Existence Entailing Attributes, Modes of Copulation, and Modes of Being in Second Order Logic”,Nous III (1969), pp. 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Croddy, W. Stephen, “Quine on Identity and Names”,Erkenntnis, XX (1976), pp. 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Føllesdal, Dagfinn, “Quantification into Causal Contexts”,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II, eds. Cohen and Wartofsky (New York: Humanities Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. —,Referential Opacity and Modal Logic (Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. —, “Knowledge, Identity, and Existence”,Theoria 33 (1967), pp. 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, Jaakko,Models for Modalities (Boston: D. Reidel, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kripke, Saul, “Identity and Necessity”,Identity and Individuation, M. Munitz, ed. (New York: NYU Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marcus, Ruth, “Modalities and Intensional Languages”,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, M.W. Wartofsky, ed. (D. Reidel, 1963), pp. 77–96.

  9. —, “Essentialism in Modal Logic”,Nous, I (1967), pp. 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. —, “Essential Attribution”,The Journal of Philosophy, LXCIII, (1971), pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —, “Dispensing with Possibilia”,Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, LXIX (1975), pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons, Terence, “Grades of Essentialism in Quantified Modal Logic”,Nous, I (1967), pp.181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, “essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic”,The Philosophical Review, LXXCIII (1969), pp. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plantinga, Alvin,The Nature of Necessity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quine, W. V.,World and Object (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  16. —, “On What There is”,From a Logical Point of View (New York: Harper and Row, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  17. —, “Reply to Kaplan”,Words and Objections, Davidson and Hintikka, eds. (Boston: D. Reidel, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  18. —,Philosophy of Logic, (Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  19. —,Methods of Logic, 3rd ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  20. —,The Ways of Paradox, revised and enlarged edition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. —, “Comment on W. S. Croddy's Paper”,Erkenntnis, XX (1976), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quine, W. V., “Intensions Revisited”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy, II (1977).

  23. Quine, W. V., “Cognitive Meaning”, Harvard University mimeograph.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Earlier versions of this paper have been the topic of colloquia at the American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Meeting, philosophy of logic section; Dartmouth College, Rutgers University, and the Philosophy of Language Conference, SUC/Buffalo. I am grateful to Professofs Lee Bowie, Robert Fogelin, Jaakko Hintikka, Ruth Marcus, J.J.C. Smart, Fred Sommers, Nathan Stemmer, Gerold Stahl, and Scott Weinstein for their comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Croddy, W.S. Reparsing and essentialism. Philosophia 17, 1–12 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389999

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389999

Navigation