Skip to main content
Log in

Toothcomb origins: Support for the grooming hypothesis

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debate over the original adaptive significance of the lemuriform toothcomb, whether it was principally a grooming organ or a scraper-feeding tool, currently hinges upon the functional morphology of the lower incisors and canines of lemurs and lorises, and the fossil adapids thought to be their ancestors or structural prototypes. We suggest that the morphology of the upper incisors and the oronasal complex of the latter, given the context of a more general theory of incisor evolution within the primates, exhibits preadaptive conditions foreshadowing the emergence of the toothcomb and also evidence of strepsirhine monophyly. We find in all underived lemuriforms and in most fossil adapids where the elements are known, a striking continuity in upper incisor form, including such derived features as an interincisal diastema, strong central incisor prong, low-crowned morphology and reduced premaxillary size. The pattern suggests a basic strepsirhine reduction in the functional significance of the anterior dentition in feeding and harvesting roles. These features may be related to a novel connection of the rhinarium with the vomeronasal organ via a sulcate pair of labial folds, which serves as a component of a specialized behavioral-physiological complex dealing with olfactory communication. Rather than being the anatomical nucleus of this system, the toothcomb may have been added secondarily in the lemuriform descendants of the preadapted adapids, possibly as a device to stimulate glandular secretion of pheromones by direct pressure, and to simultaneously distribute odorants through the fur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, K., 1978.Flehmen in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta).Behaviour, 65: 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J., 1981. Functional-adaptive analysis in evolutionary classification.Amer. Zool., 21: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, R. M., 1983. Evolution of the mandibular symphysis in Notharchinae (Adapidae, Primates).Int. J. Primatol., 4: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner-Janusch, J. &R. M. Andrew, 1962. Use of the incisors by primates in grooming.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 20: 127–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartmill, M. &R. F. Kay, 1978. Craniodental morphology, tarsier affinities and primate sub-orders. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3, Evolution,D. J. Chivers &K. A. Josey (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 205–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. B., 1978. Olfactory communication.Galago crassicaudatus and the social life of prosimians. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1, Behaviour,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. G. &K. P. Bhatnagar, 1976. Comparative anatomy of the vomeronasal organ complex in bats.J. Anat., 122: 571–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dagosto, M., 1984. Postcranium ofAdapis parisiensis andLeptadapis magnus (Adapiformes, Primates). Adaptational and phylogenetic significance.Folia Primatol., 41: 49–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. D., 1972. The role of the vomeronasal organ in mammalian reproduction.Mammalia, 36: 315–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D., 1975. Dentition ofAdapis parisiensis and the evolution of the lemuriform toothcomb. In:Lemur Biology,I. Tattersall &R. W. Sussman (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • ----, 1976. Cranial anatomy and evolution of early Tertiary Plesiadapidae (Mammalia, Primates).Mus. Paleon., Univ. of Michigan, Pap. on Paleon., 15.

  • ———— &R. D. Martin, 1981. Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. II. The Cambridge skull ofAdapis parisiensis.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 56: 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. K., 1920. On the structure and relations ofNotharctus, an American Eocene primate.Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 3: 51–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1922.The Origin and Evolution of the Human Dentition. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, H. O., 1977. The anatomical relations of the ductus vomeronasalis and the occurrence of taste buds in the papilla palatina ofNycticebus coucang (Primates, Prosimiae) with remarks on strepsirhinism.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 123: 836–856.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1980. The external anatomy of the oro-nasal region of primates.Z. Morphol., 71: 233–249.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1982. Anatomy of the oro-nasal region of some species of Tenrecidae and considerations of Tupaiids and Lemurids.Gegen. Morphol. Jahrb., 4: 588–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A., 1963.Lemur Behavior. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., 1980. Platyrrhine origins: A reappraisal of the dental evidence. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielan-Jaworowska, Z., T. M. Bown &J. A. Lillegraven, 1979. Eutheria. In:Mesozoic Mammals,J. A. Lillegraven,Z. Kielan-Jaworowska &W. A. Clemens (eds.), Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 221–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W. G., A. L. Rosenberger &M. Ramirez, 1975. Vertical clinging and leaping in a Neotropical anthropoid.Nature, 225: 327–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark, W. E., 1959.The Antecedents of Man. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &D. P. Thomas, 1952. The Miocene lemuroids of East Africa.Fos. Mam. Afr., 5: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckett, W. P., 1982.Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, W., 1979. A new dental formula for the Tupaiiformes.J. Human Evol., 8: 319–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1980a. Nasal structure in Old and New World primates. In:Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 219–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1980b. Konstruktionsmorphologische Untersuchengen an Gebiss der rezenten Prosimiae (Primates).Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 538: 1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. D., 1972. Adaptive variation of behavior of Malagasy lemurs.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (B), 26: 295–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1973. Comparative anatomy and primate systematics.Symp. Zool. Soc. London, 33: 301–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1979. Phylogenetic aspects of prosimian behavior. In:Studies of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 45–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. E., 1964.Anatomy of the Dog. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. D., A. Walker &L. L. Jacobs, 1981. Function of the mandibular toothcomb in living and extinct mammals.Nature, 289: 583–585.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, A. L., M. E. Strasser & E. Delson, 1985. Anterior dentition ofNotharctus and the adapid-anthropoid hypothesis.Folia Primatol.

  • ———— &F. S. Szalay, 1980. On the tarsiiform origin of Anthropoidea. In:Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &A. Brunetto Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, A., 1979. Olfactory communication in prosimians. In:Studies of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 461–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. H., I. Tattersall &N. Eldredge, 1978. Phylogeny and classification of the primates revisited.Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 21: 95–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., 1972.Primate Evolution: An Introduction to Man's Place in Nature. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G., 1940. Studies on the earliest primates.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 77: 185–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehlin, H. G., 1916. Die Saugetiere de schweizerischen Eozans. Critischer Catalog de Materialien, 7. Teil 2, Halfte.Abhand. Schweiz. Palaeont. Ges., 51: 1299–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan von, H. &O. J. Andy, 1969. Quantitative comparative neuroanatomy of primates: an attempt at phylogenetic interpretation.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 167: 370–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————,G. Baron &H. D. Frahm, 1982. Comparison of brain structure volumes in Insectivora and Primates. II. Accessory Olfactory bulb (ABO).J. Hirnforsch., 23: 575–591.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szalay, F. S., 1976. Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): taxonomy, phylogeny and adaptations.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 156: 157–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1981. Functional analysis and the practice of the phylogenetic method as reflected by some mammalian studies.Amer. Zool., 21: 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &E. Delson, 1979.Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &C. Katz, 1973. Phylogeny of lemurs, galagos and lorises.Folia Primatol., 19: 88–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———— &D. Seligsohn, 1977. Why did the strepsirhine toothcomb evolve?Folia Primatol., 27: 75–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., 1969. New evidence from Uganda regarding the dentition of Miocene Lorisidae.Uganda J., 33: 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohrmann-Repenning, A., 1978. Geschmacksknospen an der Papillan palatina vonTupaia glis (Diard, 1920), ihr Vorkommen und ihre Beziehung zum Jacobsonschen Organ.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 124: 375–384.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, C. J., 1979. Neurobehavioral evidence for the involvement of the vomeonasal system in Mammalian reproduction.Neuros. Biobehav. Rev., 3: 301–341.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberger, A.L., Strasser, E. Toothcomb origins: Support for the grooming hypothesis. Primates 26, 73–84 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389048

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02389048

Key Words

Navigation