Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 14–27 | Cite as

Measuring the relationship between dietary quality and body size in primates

  • Lee Douglas Sailer
  • Steven J. C. Gaulin
  • James S. Boster
  • Jeffrey A. Kurland
Article

Abstract

The feeding niche and the body size of any species are fundamental parameters that constrain the evolution of many other phenotypic characters. Moreover, previous work has shown that body size and diet are correlated, as a consequence of the negative allometry of metabolic rate. Unfortunately, the precise form of the association between body size and diet has never been specified, principally because no suitable cross-species measure of diet has been advanced. Here we develop a measure of diet that is sensitive over the whole spectrum of primate feeding niches, and use this measure to define the relationship between body size and diet for a sample of 72 primate species. Subsequently, we present several examples of how behavioral and ecological hypotheses can be tested by examining the extent to which particular species deviate from the general diet-body size pattern.

Key Words

Primates Jarman-Bell principle Methods Cross-species comparison Feeding strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, S. A., 1974. Baboons, space, time and energy.Amer. Zool., 14: 221–248.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J. D. &J. Baldwin, 1972. The ecology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii) in a natural forest in western Panama.Folia Primatol., 18: 161–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bateman, A. J., 1948. Intra-sexual selection inDrosophila.Heredity, 2: 349–368.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, R. H., 1971. A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti.Sci. Amer., 225(1): 86–93.Google Scholar
  5. Bonner, J. T., 1965.Size and Cycle: An Essay on the Structure of Biology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton N.J.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. L., 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems.Wilson Bull., 76: 160–169.Google Scholar
  7. Case, T. J., 1979. Optimal body size and an animal's diet.Acta Biotheoret., 28: 54–69.Google Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock, T., 1974. Primate social organization and ecology.Nature, 250: 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———— &P. Harvey, 1977a. Species differences in feeding and ranging behavior in primates. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 557–584.Google Scholar
  10. ———— & ————, 1977b. Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool., Lond., 183: 1–39.Google Scholar
  11. ———— & ————, 1979. Comparison and adaptation.Proc. Royal Soc., B, 205: 547–565.Google Scholar
  12. ————, ———— &B. Rudder, 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature, 269: 797–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Crook, J. H., 1964. The evolution of social organization and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae).Behav. Supple., 10: 1–178.Google Scholar
  14. ————, 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organization in the primates. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971.B. G. Campbell (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 231–281.Google Scholar
  15. Davidge, C., 1978. Ecology of baboonsPapio ursinus at cape point.Zool. Afr., 13: 329–350.Google Scholar
  16. Denham, W. W., 1971. Energy relations and some basic properties of primate social organization.Amer. Anthropol., 73: 77–95.Google Scholar
  17. DeVore, I., 1963. Comparative ecology and behavior of monkeys and apes. In:Classification and Human Evolution,S. L. Washburn (ed.), Werner-Gren Foundation, New York, pp. 301–319.Google Scholar
  18. Fleagle, J. G. &R. A. Mittermeier, 1980. Body size and comparative ecology of seven surinam monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 52: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fogden, M. A., 1974. A preliminary study of the western tarsier. In:Prosimian Biology,G. Doyle &A. C. Walker (eds.), Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar
  20. Fooden, J., 1964. Stomach contents and gastro-intestinal proportions in wild-shot Guianan monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 22: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galdikas, B. M. F. &G. Teleki, 1981. Variations in subsistence activities of male and female pongidsCurr.Anthropol., 22: 241–256.Google Scholar
  22. Gaulin, S. J. C., 1979. A Jarman-Bell model of primate feeding niches.Human Ecol., 7: 1–20.Google Scholar
  23. ———— &C. K. Gaulin, 1982. Behavioral ecology ofAlouatta seniculus in Andean cloud forest.Int. J. Primatol., 3: 1–32.Google Scholar
  24. ———— &M. Konner, 1977. On the natural diet of primates, including humans. In:Nutrition and the Brain, Vol. 1,R. Wurtman &J. Wurtman (eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–86.Google Scholar
  25. ---- &J. A. Kurland, n.d. Ecological tactics in monogamy: mating system body weight and diet among primates.Amer. J. Primatol. (under review).Google Scholar
  26. ———— &L. Sailer, 1984a. Are females the ecological sex?Amer. Anthropol., 86: 111–119.Google Scholar
  27. ———— & ————, 1984b. Sexual dimorphism among the primates: the relative impact of allometry and sexual selection.Int. J. Primatol., 5: 515–535.Google Scholar
  28. Gautier-Hion, A., 1980. Seasonal variations of diet related to species and sex in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.J. Anim. Ecol., 49: 237–269.Google Scholar
  29. ———— &J. P. Gautier, 1978. Le singe de brazza: Un strategie original.Zeitschrift Tierpsychol., 46: 84–104.Google Scholar
  30. Geist, V., 1974. On the relationship of social organization and ecology in ungulates.Amer. Zool., 14: 205–220.Google Scholar
  31. Gittens, S. P., 1982. Feeding and ranging in the agile gibbon.Folia Primatol., 38: 39–71.Google Scholar
  32. Haddow, A. H., 1952. Field and laboratory studies of the African monkey,Cercopithecus ascanius Schmidti Matschie.Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond., 122: 297–394.Google Scholar
  33. Happel, R. E., 1982. Ecology ofPithecia hirsuta in Peru.J. Hum. Evol., 11: 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harvey, P. H. &G. M. Mace, 1982. Comparisons between taxa and adaptive trends: Problems of methodology. In:Current Problems in Sociobiology,King's College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 343–361.Google Scholar
  35. Hazama, N., 1964. Weighing wild Japanese monkeys in Arashiyama.Primates, 5: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Islam, M. A. &K. A. Husein, 1982. A preliminary study of the ecology of the capped langur.Folia Primatol., 39: 145–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Iwamoto, T., 1982. Food and nutritional condition of free-ranging Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet during winter.Primates, 23: 153–170.Google Scholar
  38. Jarman, P. J., 1974. The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology.Behaviour, 58: 215–267.Google Scholar
  39. ————, 1982. Prospects for interspecific comparison in sociobiology. In:Current Problems in Sociobiology,King's College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 323–342.Google Scholar
  40. Jolly, A., 1972.The Evolution of Primate Behavior. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Kern, J. A., 1964. Observations on the habits of the proboscis monkey,Nasalis larvatus wurmb, made in the Brunei Bay area, Borneo.Zoologica, 49: 183–192.Google Scholar
  42. Kinzey, W. G., 1981. The titi monkey, genusCallicebus. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1,A. F. Coimbra-Filho &R. A. Mittermeier (eds.), Academia Brasilieira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 241–276.Google Scholar
  43. Kleiber, M., 1961.The Fire of Life. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Koganezawa, M., 1975. Food habits of the Japanese monkey,Macaca fuscata, in the Boso mountains.Contemporary Primatology, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  45. Kurland, J. A. &S. J. C. Gaulin, 1984. The evolution of male parental investment: Effects of genetic relatedness and feeding ecology on the allocation of reproductive effort. In:Primate Paternalism,D. M. Taub (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 259–308.Google Scholar
  46. Leutenegger, W. &J. Cheverud, 1982. Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables.Int. J. Primatol., 3: 387–402.Google Scholar
  47. Milton, K. &M. L. May, 1976. Body weight, diet and home range area in primates.Nature, 259: 459–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mittermeier, R. A. &M. G. M. van Roosmalen, 1981. Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys.Folia Primatol., 36: 1–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mori, A., 1979. Analysis of population changes by measurement of body weight in the Koshima troop of Japanese monkeys.Primates, 20: 371–397.Google Scholar
  50. Mostellor, F. &J. W. Tukey, 1977.Data Analysis and Regression. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  51. Napier, J. R. &P. H. Napier, 1967.Handbook of Living Primates. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  52. Niemitz, C., 1979. Outline of the behavior ofTarsius bancanus. In:The Study of Prosimian Behavior,G. A. Doyle &R. D. Martin (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 631–661.Google Scholar
  53. Quris, R., 1976. Données comparatives sur la socio-ecologie de huit espèces de cercopithecidae vivant dans une même zone de forêt primitive périodiquement inondée (nord-est du Gabon).Terre et Vie, 30: 193–209.Google Scholar
  54. Rodman, P. S., 1978. Diets, densities and distribution of bornean primates. In:The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores,G. G. Montgomery (ed.), Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 465–478.Google Scholar
  55. Roonwal, M. L. &S. M. Mohnot, 1977.Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology and Behavior. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  56. Sacher, G. &E. F. Staffeldt, 1975. Relation of gestation time to brain weight in placental mammals: implication for the theory of vertebrate growth.Amer. Naturalist, 108: 593–615.Google Scholar
  57. Schulz, A. H., 1933. Observations on the growth, classification, and evolutionary specialization of gibbons and siamangs.Human Biol., 5: 212–225.Google Scholar
  58. ————, 1941. The relative size of the cranial capacity of the primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 28: 173–287.Google Scholar
  59. Tattersall, I., 1976. Group structures and activity rhythm inLemur mongoz (Primates, Lemuriformes) on Anjouan and Moneli Islands, Comoro Archipelago.Anthropol. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York, 53(4): 367–380.Google Scholar
  60. ———— &R. W. Sussman, 1975. Observations on the ecology and behavior of the mongoose lemur,Lemur mongoz mongoz Linnaeus (Primates, Lemuriformes), at Ampijora, Madagascar.Anthropol. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., New York, 52(4): 193–216.Google Scholar
  61. Terborgh, J. 1983.Five New World Primates. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  62. Tilson, R. L., 1979. Behavior of hoolock gibbonHylobates hoolock during different seasons in Assam, India.J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 76: 1–16.Google Scholar
  63. ———— &R. R. Tenaza, 1976. Monogamy and duetting in an old world monkey.Nature, 263: 320–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Trivers, R. L., 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971,B. G. Campbell (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
  65. Tukey, J. W., 1977.Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  66. Waser, P., 1977. Feeding, ranging and group size in the Mangabey,Cercopithecus albigena. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 183–222.Google Scholar
  67. Watanabe, K., 1981. Variations in group composition and population density of the two sympatric mentawaian leaf-monkeys.Primates, 22: 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wheatley, B. P., 1982. Energetics of foraging inMacaca fascicularis andPongo pygmaeus and a selective advantage of large body size in the orang-utan.Primates, 23: 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, G. C., 1966.Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Douglas Sailer
    • 1
  • Steven J. C. Gaulin
    • 1
  • James S. Boster
    • 2
  • Jeffrey A. Kurland
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Science and Technology StudiesRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations