Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 23, pp 6341–6351 | Cite as

Influence of testing method on mechanical properties of ceramic matrix composites

  • R. N. Singh
Papers

Abstract

Mechanical properties of a monolithic zircon and zircon-matrix composites reinforced with silicon carbide monofilaments and/or whiskers were measured in three-point flexure and uniaxial tension modes to study the influence of testing methods on mechanical behaviour. A number of composite characteristics, such as the first-matrix cracking stress and strain, the ultimate composite strength and strain, and the modulus were obtained from the load-deflection behaviour in flexure and tension tests. The results indicated that the modulus values and the qualitative dependence of mechanical properties on composite parameters were similar in flexure and tension tests. In contrast, all of the other mechanical properties of the monolithic and composites were different in tests performed in flexure and tension modes. Typically, the first-matrix cracking stress and strain were higher in flexure tests than in tension tests, and these stress and strain values were independent of the filament-matrix interfacial properties. Similarly, the ultimate strengths of the monolithic and composites were higher in flexure than in tension, and these strengths were independent of interfacial properties. Therefore, the mechanical properties of composites obtained in flexure should not be used for a quantitative comparison with the predictions of micromechanical models, which are derived under the assumption of a uniform tensile stress. However, the flexure data are perfectly valid in demonstrating the qualitative dependence of mechanical properties on composite parameters.

Keywords

Zircon Uniaxial Tension Tension Test Interfacial Property Micromechanical Model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Mah, M. G. Mendiratta, A. P. Katz, R. Ruh andK. S. Mazdiyasni,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 68 (1985) C-27.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. B. Marshall andA. G. Evans,ibid. 68 (1985) 225.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. N. Singh andA. R. Gaddipati,J. Mater. Sci. 25 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. N. Singh,ibid. 26 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Idem., in “Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Chemical Vapor Deposition” (CVD-X), Honolulu, Hawaü Vol. 87–7 edited by G. W. Cullen (The Electrochemical Society, 1987) p. 543.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Idem., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 73 (1990) 2930.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Idem., ibid. 72 (1989) 764.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. A. Siemers andR. L. Mehan,J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. N. Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.General Electric Corporate Research and DevelopmentSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations