Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 2971–2974 | Cite as

Analysis of the effect of porosity and pigment shape on the stiffness of coating layers

  • P. Lepoutre
  • M. Rigdahl
Papers

Abstract

The elastic modulus of paper coating layers made of mineral pigments and containing 9% by weight of a synthetic binder was measured at 23°C. The mineral pigments used comprised clay, ground natural calcium carbonate and different forms of precipitated CaCO3 (aragonite, rhombic and scalenohedral). The pigments used differed in shape from isometric to plate-like and needle-like particles. From the measured values of the modulus, the corresponding values of void-free coatings were evaluated using a model proposed by Bert which also accounts for the effect of stress concentrations due to the presence of the voids. The calculated modulus values of the void-free coatings were compared with predictions from composite theory, e.g. the Halpin-Tsai equations. In general, a reasonable agreement was noted indicating that paper coatings of this type can be regarded as composite materials and can be analysed with the methods used within that field.

Keywords

Clay Porosity Elastic Modulus CaCO3 Stress Concentration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. TOTH and F. BUZAS,Zellstoff u. Papier 32 (1983) 68.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. A. TABER and R. C. STEIN,Tappi 40(2) (1957) 107.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. PARPAILLON, G. ENGSTRÖM, I. PETTERSSON, I. FINEMAN, S. E. SVANSON, B. DELLENFALK and M. RIGDAHL,J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 30 (1985) 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. LEPOUTRE and T. HIRAHARU,J. Appl. Polym. Sci., in press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. FELLERS, H. ANDERSSON and H. HOLLMARK, in “Paper Structure and Properties”, edited by J. A. Bristow and P. Koseth (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1986) p. 151.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. M. SPRIGGS,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 36 (1953) 68.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. E. McADAM,J. Iron Steel Inst. 168 (1951) 346.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. W. BERT,J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. A. CLIMPSON and J. H. TAYLOR,Tappi 59(7) (1976) 89.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. C. HALPIN and J. L. KARDOS,Polym. Engng Sci. 18 (1978) 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. R. PIGGOTT,Polym. Compos. 3 (1982) 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. RIGDAHL, B. WESTERLIND and H. HOLLMARK,J. Mater. Sci. 19 (1984) 3945.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. A. RADOSTA, Proceedings of the SPE 33rd Annual Technical Conference, Atlanta (1975) p. 525.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. C. BLACKLEY, “Synthetic Rubbers. Their Chemistry and Technology” (Applied Science, London, 1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. M. NEWAZ,Polym. Compos. 7 (1986) 176.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. E. NIELSEN, “Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites”, Vol. 2 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. E. PADAWER and N. BEECHER,Polym. Engng Sci. 10 (1970) 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Lepoutre
    • 1
  • M. Rigdahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish Pulp and Paper Research Institute (STFI)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations