Skip to main content
Log in

The market as an open access commons: A neglected aspect of excess capacity

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper adapts the common property theory of fisheries economics to the analysis of perfectly competitive markets. It demonstrates that the open access characteristics of markets lead to dissipation of available ‘market rents’ through the costs of excess capacity. The conclusion is that an increase in net economic benefits may be generated by restricting the number (capacity) of units operating in perfectly competitive markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carroll, T.M., D.H. Ciscil and R.K. Chisholm. ‘The Market as a Commons: An Unconventional View of Property Rights,’Journal of Economic Issues, XIII (1979), pp. 605–627.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlin, E.H.,The Theory of Monopolisitc Competition (8th Edition), Cambrdge, 1962.

  3. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., and R.C. Bishop, ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy,’Natural Resources Journal, XV (1975), pp 713–727.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, C.W., and G.R. Munro, ‘The Economics of Fishing and Modern Capital Theory: A Simplified Approach,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management., II (1975), pp. 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Copes, P., ‘The Backward-Bending Supply Curve of the Fishing Industry,’Scottish Journal of Political Economy, XVII (1970), pp. 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Copes, P., ‘Factor Rents, Sole Ownership and the Optimum Level of Fisheries Exploitation,’Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, XL (1972), pp. 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Vany, A. S., ‘Capacity Utilization under Alternative Regulatory Constraints: An Analysis of Taxi Markets,’Journal of Political Economy, LXXXIII (1975), pp. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, H.S., and W. Fellner, ‘External Economies and Diseconomies,’.American Economic Review, XXXIII (1943), pp. 493–511.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon, H.S., ‘The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource: The Fishery,’Journal of Political Economy, LXII (1954), pp. 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannesson, R.,Economics of Fisheries, Oslo, 1978.

  11. Hardin, G., ‘The Tragedy of the Commons,’Science, CLXII (1968), pp. 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaldor, N., ‘Market Imperfection and Excess Capacity,’Economica, New Series, II (1935), pp. 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, L.R., ‘Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity,’Econometrica, XXVIII (1960), pp. 272–286.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lancaster, K., ‘Socially Optimal Product Differentiation,’American Economic Review, LXV (1975), pp. 567–585.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lipsey, R.G., and K. Lancaster, ‘The General Theory of Second Best,’Review of Economic Studies, XXIV (1956), pp. 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McKee, M., and E. G. West, ‘The Theory of Second Best: A Solution in Search of a Problem,’Economic Inquiry, XIX (1981), pp. 436–448.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mill, J.S.,Principles of Political Economy, (new edition, edited by W.H. Ashley, 1909), reprinted, New York, 1965.

  18. Mishan, E.J., ‘Second Thought on Second Best,’Oxford Economic Papers, XIV (1962), pp. 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schaefer, M.B., ‘Some Considerations of Population Dynamics and Economics in Relation to the Management of the Commercial Marine Fisheries,’Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, XIV (1957), pp. 669–681.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tinbergen, J., ‘The Theory of the Optimum Regime,’ in: L.H. Klaassen, L.M. Koyck and H.J. Witteveen (eds.)Jan Tinbergen Selected Papers, Amsterdam, 1959.

  21. Winston, G.C., ‘The Theory of Capital Utilization and Idleness,’Journal of Economic Literature, XII (1974), pp. 1301–1320.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Professor of Economics, Simon Fraser University. The author gratefully acknowledges research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Reserch Council of Canada. He recognizes helpful discussions with his colleagues Pao Cheng, Arthur DeVany and Zane Spindler, without implicating them in the analysis or conclusions of this paper. Useful referee comments are also acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copes, P. The market as an open access commons: A neglected aspect of excess capacity. De Economist 132, 49–60 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384069

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384069

Keywords

Navigation