Summary
This paper adapts the common property theory of fisheries economics to the analysis of perfectly competitive markets. It demonstrates that the open access characteristics of markets lead to dissipation of available ‘market rents’ through the costs of excess capacity. The conclusion is that an increase in net economic benefits may be generated by restricting the number (capacity) of units operating in perfectly competitive markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, T.M., D.H. Ciscil and R.K. Chisholm. ‘The Market as a Commons: An Unconventional View of Property Rights,’Journal of Economic Issues, XIII (1979), pp. 605–627.
Chamberlin, E.H.,The Theory of Monopolisitc Competition (8th Edition), Cambrdge, 1962.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V., and R.C. Bishop, ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy,’Natural Resources Journal, XV (1975), pp 713–727.
Clark, C.W., and G.R. Munro, ‘The Economics of Fishing and Modern Capital Theory: A Simplified Approach,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management., II (1975), pp. 92–106.
Copes, P., ‘The Backward-Bending Supply Curve of the Fishing Industry,’Scottish Journal of Political Economy, XVII (1970), pp. 69–77.
Copes, P., ‘Factor Rents, Sole Ownership and the Optimum Level of Fisheries Exploitation,’Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, XL (1972), pp. 145–163.
De Vany, A. S., ‘Capacity Utilization under Alternative Regulatory Constraints: An Analysis of Taxi Markets,’Journal of Political Economy, LXXXIII (1975), pp. 83–94.
Ellis, H.S., and W. Fellner, ‘External Economies and Diseconomies,’.American Economic Review, XXXIII (1943), pp. 493–511.
Gordon, H.S., ‘The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource: The Fishery,’Journal of Political Economy, LXII (1954), pp. 124–142.
Hannesson, R.,Economics of Fisheries, Oslo, 1978.
Hardin, G., ‘The Tragedy of the Commons,’Science, CLXII (1968), pp. 1243–1248.
Kaldor, N., ‘Market Imperfection and Excess Capacity,’Economica, New Series, II (1935), pp. 33–50.
Klein, L.R., ‘Some Theoretical Issues in the Measurement of Capacity,’Econometrica, XXVIII (1960), pp. 272–286.
Lancaster, K., ‘Socially Optimal Product Differentiation,’American Economic Review, LXV (1975), pp. 567–585.
Lipsey, R.G., and K. Lancaster, ‘The General Theory of Second Best,’Review of Economic Studies, XXIV (1956), pp. 11–32.
McKee, M., and E. G. West, ‘The Theory of Second Best: A Solution in Search of a Problem,’Economic Inquiry, XIX (1981), pp. 436–448.
Mill, J.S.,Principles of Political Economy, (new edition, edited by W.H. Ashley, 1909), reprinted, New York, 1965.
Mishan, E.J., ‘Second Thought on Second Best,’Oxford Economic Papers, XIV (1962), pp. 205–217.
Schaefer, M.B., ‘Some Considerations of Population Dynamics and Economics in Relation to the Management of the Commercial Marine Fisheries,’Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, XIV (1957), pp. 669–681.
Tinbergen, J., ‘The Theory of the Optimum Regime,’ in: L.H. Klaassen, L.M. Koyck and H.J. Witteveen (eds.)Jan Tinbergen Selected Papers, Amsterdam, 1959.
Winston, G.C., ‘The Theory of Capital Utilization and Idleness,’Journal of Economic Literature, XII (1974), pp. 1301–1320.
Additional information
Professor of Economics, Simon Fraser University. The author gratefully acknowledges research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Reserch Council of Canada. He recognizes helpful discussions with his colleagues Pao Cheng, Arthur DeVany and Zane Spindler, without implicating them in the analysis or conclusions of this paper. Useful referee comments are also acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Copes, P. The market as an open access commons: A neglected aspect of excess capacity. De Economist 132, 49–60 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384069
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02384069