Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of varying levels of confidentiality on self-disclosure

  • Articles
  • Published:
Group

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allen, J. G. Implications of research in self-disclosure for group therapy.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1973,23, 306–321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association, Official Actions. Position statement on guidelines for psychiatrists: Problems in confidentiality.American Journal of Psychiatry 1970,126, 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. Standards for providers of psychological services.APA Monitor, 1975,6, 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangs, A. J. Privilege and the counseling profession.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971,50, 270–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. P. Effects of signed and unsigned questionnaires for both sensitive and nonsensitive items,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973,57, 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory.Behavioral Science, 1974,19, 1–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. P. Signed versus unsigned personal questionnaires.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1946,30, 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L. M. Illinois. A pioneer in the law of mental health privileged communications.Illinois Bar Journal, 1974,62, 668–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnett, R. T., & Seligsohn, H. C. The effects of varying degrees of anonymity of responses to different types of psychological questionnaires.Journal of Educational Measurements, 1967,4, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourd, S.The transparent self. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand Co., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetgert, M. J., & Armstrong, A. H. Methodological issues in drug usage surveys: Anonymity, recency, and frequency.The International Journal of the Addictions, 1973,8, 683–689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D., & Crowne, D.The approval motive. New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. J., & Kinnick, B. C. Let's close the confidentiality gap.Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1970,18, 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. Issues on the interface of law and psychology. In A. Rabin (Ed.),Clinical psychology: Issues of the seventies. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1974, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R., & Smith, S. A crisis in group therapy.American Psychologist, 1977,32, 638–643.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, W. C., Waiver of signature in personal reports.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1936,20, 442–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S. A. Privileged communications, Confidentiality, and privacy.Professional Psychologist, 1969,1, 56–69, 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. Confidentiality.The Clinical Psychologist, 1976,30, 1, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore, J.Evidence in trials at Common Law. McNaughton revision (Vol. 8), Boston: Little, Brown, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Willage, D.E., Meyer, R.G. The effects of varying levels of confidentiality on self-disclosure. Group 2, 88–97 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383521

Keywords

Navigation