Advertisement

Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 51–56 | Cite as

Responsiveness of parathyroid hormone to bone resorption in 13-day-old embryonic chick calvaria cultures

  • Tatsuro Miyahara
  • Takumi Hoshino
  • Ikuyoshi Makita
  • Masa-aki Mori
  • Hiroshi Kozuka
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

To clarify what kind of process participates in bone resorption, time course of indices of bone resorption was investigated using 13-day-old embryonic chick calvaria. When calvariae were cultured with parathyroid hormone (PTH) at 0.01 U/ml for 8 days, hydroxyproline (Hyp) release was already stimulated by PTH in cultures by 1 to 2 days but stimulation of45Ca release was not observed even in cultures by 6 to 8 days. Furthermore, stimulation of collagenase release by PTH was observed prior to that of Hyp release. These results indicate that collagenase release precedes Hyp release, which is followed by45Ca release. The release of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TrACP), a marker enzyme of osteoclast, was stimulated by PTH at 0.1 U/ml and above to a greater extent in cultures by 5 to 8 days (phase 11) than in cultures by 0 to 4 days (phase 1). E-64, an inhibitor of cysteine proteinase, inhibited PTH-stimulated45Ca release strongly in phase 11 but showed a slight decrease in Hyp release in the same phase. These results suggest that first PTH stimulates collagenase production from osteoblasts, secondly collagenase degrades uncalcified collagen and lastly osteoclasts resorb mineralized bones.

Key words

Parathyroid hormone Bone resorption Hydroxyproline Collagenase Cysteine proteinase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Neuman WF, Mulryan BJ and Martin GR: A chemical view of osteoclasis based on studies with Yttrium. Clin Orthop 17: 124–134, 1960Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakamoto S and Sakamoto M: Biochemical and immunohistochemical studies on collagenase in resorbing bone in tissue culture. J Period Res 17: 523–526, 1982Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sakamoto S and Sakamoto M: On the possibility that bone matrix collagen is removed prior to bone mineral during active cell-mediated bone resorption. In: Current advances in skeletogenesis (eds) Ornoy A, Harrell A and Sera J, P. 65. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Amsterdam 1985.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyahara T, Miyakoshi M, Saito Y et al.: Influence of poisonous metals on bone metabolism III. The effect of cadmium of bone resorption in tissue culture. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 55: 477–483, 1980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen V and Clark NB: Effects of parathyroid hormone and calcitonin on embryonic chick bone in organ culture. Gen Comp Endoclinol 44: 319–323, 1981Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endo H: Cartilage matrix metabolism of chondrocytes changing through their life span and its possible hormonal control, as demonstrated by tissue culture studies. Conn Tissue 6: 139–148, 1974Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huszar G, Maiocco J and Naftoline F: Monitoring of collagen and collagen fragments in choromatography of protein mixture. Anal Biochem 105: 424–429, 1980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagai Y, Hori H, Hattori S et al.: A micro-assay method of collagenase activity and its application in the study of collagen metabolism in pathological tissues. part I assay of collagenase activity using FITC-labeled collagen as substrate. Inflammation 4: 123–130, 1984Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saito M, Kawashima K and Endo H: The establishment of a new biological assay system for simultaneous measurement of bone resorption and mineralization in organ cultures of chick embryonic femur. J Pharmacobio-Dyn 10: 487–493, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chambers TJ, Darby JA and Fuller K: Mammalian collagenase predisposes bone surfaces to osteoclastic resorption. Cell Tissue Res 241: 671–675, 1985CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakamoto M and Sakamoto S: Immunocytochemical localization of collagenase in isolated mouse bone cells. Biomed Res 5: 29–38, 1984Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takahashi N, Yamana H, Yoshiki S et al.: Osteoclast-like cell ormation and its regulation by osteotropic hormones in mouse bone marrow cultures. Endocrinology 122: 1373–1382, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delaissé JM, Eeckhout Y and Vaes G: In vivo and in vitro evidence for the involvement of cysteine proteinases in bone resorption. Biochem Biophy Res Commun 125: 441–447, 1984Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaes G: Cellular biology and biochemical mechanism of bone resorption. Clin Orthop 231: 239–271, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harada M, Miyahara T, Miyata M et al.: Effects on cultured neonatal mouse calvaria of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27-hexafluoro-1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, and 26, 26, 26, 27, 27, 27-hexafluoro-1α, 23S, 25-trihydroxyvitamin D3. Bone Miner 18: 41–49, 1992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Delaissé JM, Eeckhout Y, Sear C et al.: A new synthetic inhibitor of mammalian tissue collagenase inhibits bone resorption in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 133: 483–490, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Bone Metabolism Research 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuro Miyahara
    • 1
  • Takumi Hoshino
    • 1
  • Ikuyoshi Makita
    • 1
  • Masa-aki Mori
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Kozuka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesToyama Medical and Pharmaceutical SciencesToyama-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations