Entomophaga

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 213–228 | Cite as

The genusPhytoseiusRibaga, 1902 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)

  • D. A. Chant
  • C. Athias-Henriot
Article

Keywords

Plant Pathology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Athias-Henriot, C. — 1957.Phytoseiidae etAceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d'Algérie. I. GenresBlattisocius Keegan,Iphiseius Berlese,Amblyseius Berlese.Phytoseius Ribaga,Phytoseiulus Evans. —Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. Nord,48, 319–352.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, N. — 1909. New Canadian mites. —Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington,11, 133–143.Google Scholar
  3. Camin, J. H. & F. E. Gorirossi. — 1955. A revision of the suborderMesostigmata (Acarina), based on new interpretations of comparative morphological data. —Chicago Acad. Sci. Spec. Publ. 11.Google Scholar
  4. Canesthini, C. &F. Fanzago. — 1876. Nuovi acari italiani. —Atti Soc. Veneto-Trent.,5, 130–142.Google Scholar
  5. Chant, D. A. — 1957. Descriptions of two new phytoseiid genera (Acarina:Phytoseiidae), with a note onPhytoseius Ribaga, 1902. —Canad. Ent.,89, 357–363.Google Scholar
  6. Chant, D. A.In press. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I: Bionomics of seven species in Southeastern England. Part II: A taxomic review of the familyPhytoseiidae, with description of 37 new species.Google Scholar
  7. Cunliffe, F. & E. W. Baker. — 1953. A guide to the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. —Pinellas Biol. Lab. Pub., 1.Google Scholar
  8. De Leon, D. — 1959. A new genus and three new species of phytoseiid mites from Mexico with collection records onPhytoseius plumifer (C. & F.) andP. macropilis (Banks). —Ent. News,70 (6), 147–152.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, G. O. — 1957. An introduction to the BritishMesostigmata (Acarina) with keys to the families and genera. —J. Linn. Soc. London, Zool.,43, 203–256.Google Scholar
  10. Garman, P. — 1948. Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. —Connecticut Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull., 520, 1–27.Google Scholar
  11. Murgatroyd, J. H. — 1952.Phytoseius spoofi (Ouds.) (Acari,Laelaptidae) new to Britain. —Ent. Mon. Mag.,88, 264.Google Scholar
  12. Nesbitt, H. H. J. — 1951. A taxonomic study of thePhytoseiinae (FamilyLaelaptidae) predacious uponTetranychidae of economic importance. —Zool. Verhandel. 1 (12), 1–64.Google Scholar
  13. — — 1954. Some random notes on the mite fauna of Limburg with the description of two new species. —Natuurhist. Maandbl.,43, 19–24.Google Scholar
  14. Oudemans, A. C. — 1915a. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. —Ent. Ber.,4 (83), 184.Google Scholar
  15. ——1915b. Notizen über Acari, XXII (Parasitidae). —Arch. Naturgesch.,81A (1), 161–165.Google Scholar
  16. Ribaga, C. — 1902. Gamasidi planticoli. —Riv. Pat. Veg. Portici,10, 175–178.Google Scholar
  17. Wainstein, B. A. — 1959. Novyi podrod i vid rodaPhytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes). —Zool. J.,38 (9), 1361–1365.Google Scholar
  18. Womersley, H. — 1954. Species of the subfamilyPhytoseiinae (Acarina,Laelaptidae) from Australia. —Austral. J. Zool.,2, 169–191.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Le François 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Chant
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Athias-Henriot
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Entomology Research Institute for Biological ControlBellevilleCanada
  2. 2.École nationale d'agricultureAlgerFrance

Personalised recommendations