Group

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 147–161 | Cite as

Observing groups as seen from both sides of the looking glass

  • Peter A. Martin
  • Muriel Tornga
  • James F. McGloinJr.
  • Steven Boles
Articles

Conclusion

This paper attempts to make a contribution to an area of the literature on group therapy about which very little has been published—the effects of the therapy group upon the observing group and the dynamics of the observing group as an entity in itself. Although work on which this paper is based took place in training institutions where education is the primary function, it is important to emphasize that education and personal change are interrelated. Psychotherapeutic activity takes place spontaneously with the observers and needs to be constructively utilized. This wealth of process and reaction is an untapped training opportunity for the observing group. The challenge of method, personal reactions, and group process responses are all opportunities for its members to both learn more as therapists and mature as individuals. At this juncture, we are trying to establish ways of

Keywords

Social Psychology Group Therapy Primary Function Group Process Cross Cultural Psychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berne, E.Principles of Group Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, V., & Dobie, S. I. The effect of observers on the process of group therapy.The International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1969,19, 79–87.Google Scholar
  3. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. S.The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy, (2nd Ed.). New York: International Universities Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Fairhood, L. Choosing a partner for co-therapy.Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 1975,13(4), 177–179.Google Scholar
  5. Goforth, E., Mowatt, M., & Clarke, N. Effect of the presence of an observer and a hidden observer on the defensive patterns of an ongoing group.The International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1966, (16), 338–342.Google Scholar
  6. Kadushin, A. An experience in tape recording interviews; report of an adoptive follow-up study.Journal of Jewish Communical Service, Summer 1967,43(4), 327–334.Google Scholar
  7. Krasner, J., Feldman, B., Liff, Z., Mermelstein, I., Aronson, M. L. & Guttmann, O.Observing the observers.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 1964,14, 214–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kritzer, H., & Phillips, C. A. Observing group psychotherapy—an affective learning experience.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1966,20, 471–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin, P. A.A Marital Therapy Manual. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Powdermaker, F., & Frank, J.Group Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  11. Rice, D. G., Fey, W. F., & Kepecs, J. G. The rapist experience and “style” in co-therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. G. Rice (Eds.),Couples in conflict. New York: Aronson, 1975, 151–161.Google Scholar
  12. Rice, J. K., & Rice, D. G.. Status and sex role issues in co-therapy. A. S. Gurman & D. G. Rice, (Eds.),Couples in conflict. New York, Aronson, 1975, 145–150.Google Scholar
  13. Weinstein, I. Guidelines on the choice of a co-therapist.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1971,8, 301–303.Google Scholar
  14. Wolman, R. N. Through the one-way mirror: An analysis of the dynamics in the observation of psychotherapy.Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1970,7, 108–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. Martin
    • 4
    • 1
  • Muriel Tornga
    • 4
  • James F. McGloinJr.
    • 4
  • Steven Boles
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Wayne State University Medical SchoolsUSA
  2. 2.Ann ArborUSA
  3. 3.ToledoUSA
  4. 4.Psychiatry Outpatient DepartmentUiversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations