, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 361–367 | Cite as

Factors influencing the population density of the hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus) in Sariska Tiger Reserve

  • Caroline Ross
  • Arun Srivastava
Short Communication


We carried out a study of Hanuman langurs in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India during three months in 1990. The area surveyed included habitat disturbed by human activity, with both the grazing of livestock and firewood collecting resulting in degraded forest. Langur population density was estimated to be between 19 and 36 animals/km2. The density of langurs in disturbed areas was significantly lower than in undisturbed areas. Both tree cover, total tree, and shrub cover were positively correlated with langur density, suggesting that a lack of trees in disturbed areas may have caused the lower langur densities. Although bisexual groups were significantly more common in undisturbed areas the distribution of all male groups did not appear to be affected by human disturbance, suggesting that male bands are likely to inhabit more disturbed habitats than bisexual groups. We suggest that either a lack of food trees or the high density of predators in Sariska may prevent bisexual groups from inhabiting areas where tree cover is low, although the more mobile male groups can survive in these areas. Although Hanuman langurs are a relatively common species in India, these results suggest that they are not, as is commonly assumed, immune to the effects of human disturbance. In areas where langurs appear to survive in disturbed habitats the different response of bisexual and all male groups to disturbance may still result in serious disruption to the population structure.

Key Words

Presbytis entellus Population density Habitat disturbance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cheney, L. &R. W. Wrangham, 1987. Predation. In:Primate Societies,B. B. Smuts,D. L. Cheney,R. M. Seyfarth,R. W. Wrangham, &T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, pp. 227–239.Google Scholar
  2. Choudhury, A., 1988. Priority ratings for conservation of Indian primates.Oryx, 22: 89–94.Google Scholar
  3. Hrdy, S. B., 1977.The Langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Schaller, G. B., 1967.The Deer and the Tiger. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.Google Scholar
  5. Srivastava, A., 1989. Feeding ecology and behaviour of the Hanuman langur (Presbytis entellus). Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Jodhpur, India.Google Scholar
  6. Vogel, C., 1976. Ökologie, lebensweise und socialverhalten der grauen languren in verschiedenen biotopen Indiens. In:Fortschritte der Verhaltensforschung, Beihefte 17 zur Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie (Advances in Ethology, Supplement 17 to J. Comp. Ethol.), Verlag Paul Pary, Berlin, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar
  7. —, 1977. Ecology and sociology ofPresbytis entellus. In:Use of Non-human Primates in Medical Research,M. R. N. Prasad &T. C. A. Kumar (eds.), Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
  8. Wolfheim, J. H., 1983.Primates of the World: Distribution, Abundance and Conservation. Univ. of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Ross
    • 1
  • Arun Srivastava
    • 2
  1. 1.University of DurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations