Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 395–402 | Cite as

Power and limits of DNA-profiling in primate populations: Paternity assessment in rhesus macaques from Cayo Santiago

  • Michael Krawczak
  • John D. Berard
  • Fred B. Bercovitch
  • Jorg Schmidtke
  • Peter Nürnberg
Short Communication Part 2: Ecology, Demography, And Relatedness

Abstract

Paternity testing was performed in one social group (S) of rhesus macaques from Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico. In 11/15 cases, sires could be identified comparing the multilocus DNA profiles of 19 males to those of the corresponding mother/child dyads. All 19 males could be excluded from paternity in the remaining four cases. Decision making was partly based on likelihoods of DNA profiles, and the theoretical model underlying these calculation is described. In a second social group (M), held in captivity, paternity testing was impeded by a deficit of maternal bands and by an increased extent of band sharing of mothers and their infants. Some possible explanations for these findings, including increased homozygosity in group M, are discussed.

Key Words

DNA fingerprinting Oligonucleotides Paternity assessment Heterozygosity Rhesus monkeys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnemann, J., J. Schmidtke, J. T. Epplen, H. -J. Kuhn, &W. Kaumanns, 1989. DNA fingerprinting for paternity and maternity in Group O Cayo Santiago-derived rhesus monkeys at the German Primate Center: results of a pilot study.P.R. Health Sci. J., 8: 181–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blin, N. &D. W. Stafford, 1976. A general method for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes.Nucl. Acids Res., 3: 2303–2308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bockel, B., P. Nürnberg, &M. Krawczak, 1992. Likelihoods of multilocus DNA fingerprints in extended families.Amer. J. Human Genet., 51: 554–561.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, J. E., 1990. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: potential effects on data interpretation of subpopulation heterogeneity and band number variability.Amer. J. Human Genet., 46: 358–368.Google Scholar
  5. Dixson, A. F., N. Hastie, I. Patel, &A. J. Jeffreys, 1988. DNA “fingerprinting” of captive family groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).Folia Primatol., 51: 52–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ely, J., P. Alford, &R. E. Ferrell, 1991. DNA “fingerprinting” and the genetic management of a captive chimpanzee population (Pan troglodytes).Amer. J. Primatol., 24: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———— &R. E. Ferrell, 1990. DNA “fingerprints” and paternity ascertainment in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).Zoo Biology, 9: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epplen, J. T., 1992. The methodology of multilocus DNA fingerprinting using radioactive or non-radioactive oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeat motifs. In:Advances in Electrophoresis,A. Chrambach,M. J. Dunn, &B. J. Radola (eds.), VCH, Weinheim, pp. 59–114.Google Scholar
  9. ————,H. Ammer, C. Epplen, C. Kammerbauer, R. Mitreiter, L. Roewer, W. Schwaiger, V. Steimle, H. Zischler, E. Albert, A. Andreas, B. Beyermann, W. Meyer, J. Buitkamp, I. Nanda, M. Schmid, P. Nürnberg, S. D. J. Pena, H. Pöche, W. Sprecher, M. Schartl, K. Weising, &A. Yassourdis, 1991. Oligonucleotide fingerprinting using simple repeat motifs: a convenient, ubiquitously applicable method to detect hypervariability for multiple purposes. In:DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications,T. Burke,G. Dolf,A. J. Jeffreys, &R. Wolff (eds.), Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 50–69.Google Scholar
  10. Jeffreys, A. J., J. F. Y. Brookfield, &R. Semeonoff, 1985. Positive identification of an immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprints.Nature, 317: 818–819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. ————,M. Turner, &P. Debenham, 1991. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework.Amer. J. Human Genet., 48: 824–840.Google Scholar
  12. ————,V. Wilson, &S. L. Thein, 1985a. Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA.Nature, 314: 67–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. ————, ————, & ————, 1985b. Individual-specific DNA “fingerprints” of human DNA.Nature, 316: 76–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kessler, M. J. &J. D. Berard, 1989. A brief description of the Cayo Santiago rhesus monkey colony.P.R. Health Sci. J., 8: 55–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Krawczak, M. &B. Bockel, 1991. DNA fingerprinting: a short note on mutation rates.Human Genet., 87: 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———— & ————, 1992. A genetic factor model for the statistical analysis of multilocus DNA fingerprints.Electrophoresis, 13: 10–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. ————,I. Böhm, P. Nürnberg, J. Hampe, J. Hundrieser, H. Pöche, C. Peters, R. Slomski, J. Kwiatkowska, M. Nagy, A. Pöpperl, J. T. Epplen, &J. Schmidtke, 1992. Paternity testing with oligonucleotide multilocus probe (CAC)5/(GTG)5: a multi-center study.Forensic Sci. Int., 59: 101–117.Google Scholar
  18. Kunkel, L. M., K. D. Smith, S. H. Boyer, D. Borgaonkar, S. S. Wachtel, O. J. Miller, W. R. Breg, H. W. Jones, Jr., &M. Rary, 1977. Analysis of human Y-chromosome-specific reiterated DNA in chromosome variants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 74: 1245–1249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, R. D., A. F. Dixon, &E. J. Wickings (eds.), 1992.Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories - Implications of Human DNA Fingerprinting. Karger AG, Basel.Google Scholar
  20. Rawlins, R. G. &M. J. Kessler (eds.), 1986.The Cayo Santiago Macaques: History, Behavior, and Biology. State Univ. of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  21. Ryskov, A. P., A. G. Jincharadze, M. I. Prosnyak, P. L. Ivanov, &S. A. Liborska, 1988. M13 phage DNA as a universal maker for DNA fingerprinting of animals, plants, and microorganisms.Febs. Lett., 233: 388–392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Weiss, M. L., V. Wilson, C. Chan, T. Turner, &A. J. Jeffreys, 1988. Application of DNA fingerprinting probes to old world monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol., 16: 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Krawczak
    • 1
  • John D. Berard
    • 2
  • Fred B. Bercovitch
    • 2
  • Jorg Schmidtke
    • 3
  • Peter Nürnberg
    • 4
  1. 1.Abteilung HumangenetikMedizinische HochschuleHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Caribbean Primate Research CenterUniversity of Puerto RicoSabana SecaPuerto Rico
  3. 3.Abteilung HumangenetikMedizinische HochschuleHannoverGermany
  4. 4.Institut fur Medizinische GenetikHumboldt-UniversitätBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations