, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 347–356 | Cite as

Non-invasive sampling and DNA amplification for paternity exclusion, community structure, and phylogeography in wild chimpanzees

  • Phillip A. Morin
  • Janette Wallis
  • James J. Moore
  • Ranajit Chakraborty
  • David S. Woodruff
Short Communication Part 1: Molecular Ecology — The Present And The Future


Genetic studies of free-ranging primates have been seriously impeded by difficulties of sampling tissues, including the undesirability of bleeding habituated animals, of transporting frozen samples to the laboratory, and of the inherent inadequacies of accessible variation including allozymes, mtDNA RFLP patterns and DNA fingerprints. We have developed methods of non-invasive DNA sampling and DNA-level genotyping which, when combined with a hierarchical analysis of mtDNA sequences and hypervariable nDNA simple sequence repeat (microsatellite) loci size length polymorphisms, facilitate the resolution of most questions at the individual, social group (community), population, and species (phylogenetic) levels. This approach, based on DNA amplified from shed hair, represents an important new tool for the acquisition of genetic information and will facilitate the study and management of both captive and free-ranging chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Our hierarchical analysis of population genetics of chimpanzees has revealed high historical levels of gene flow and large effective population sizes, as well as substantial divergence between the West African subspecies and chimpanzees from central and East Africa. At the community level, closer relatedness among philopatric males than among females supports the view that kin selection has been an evolutionary force shaping male-male cooperation in this species. Results from our study of the now relatively isolated Gombe community suggest that habitat fragmentation affects population genetic structure and possibly population viability.

Key Words

Pan Mitochondrial DNA Microsatellites D-loop Cytochrome b 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avise, J. C., 1989. Gene trees and organismal histories: a phylogenetic approach to population biology.Evolution, 43: 1192–1208.Google Scholar
  2. Bygott, J. D., 1979. Agonistic behavior, dominance, and social structure in wild chimpanzees of the Gombe National Park. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds.), Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Menlo Park, pp. 405–428.Google Scholar
  3. Caley, M. J., 1991. A null model for testing distributions of dispersal distances.Amer. Naturalist, 138: 524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakraborty, R., T. R. Meagher, &P. E. Smouse, 1988. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations: I. the expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.Genetics, 118: 527–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakravarti, A. &C. C. Li, 1983. The effect of linkage on paternity calculations. In:Inclusion Probabilities in Parentage Testing,R. H. Walker,R. J. Duquesnoy,E. R. Jennings,H. D. Krause,C. L. Lee, &H. F. Polesky (eds.), American Association of Blood Banks, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 411–420.Google Scholar
  6. di Rienzo, A. &A. C. Wilson, 1991. Branching pattern in the evolutionary tree for human mitochondrial DNA.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88: 1597–1601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, A., H. A. Hammond, L. Jin, C. T. Caskey, &R. Chakraborty, 1992. Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups.Genomics, 12: 241–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris, S. D., W. M. Brown, W. S. Davidson, &A. C. Wilson, 1981. Extensive polymorphism in the mitochondrial DNA of apes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 78: 6319–6323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Foran, D. R., J. E. Hixson, &W. M. Brown, 1988. Comparisons of ape and human sequences that regulate mitochondrial DNA transcription and D-loop DNA synthesis.Nucleic Acids Res., 16: 5841–5861.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghiglieri, M. P., 1984.The Chimpanzees of Kibale Forest: A Field Study of Ecology and Social Structure. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Goodall, J., 1986.The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  12. Groves, C. P., 1989.A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. ————,C. Westwood, &B. T. Shea, 1992. Unfinished business: Mahalanobis and a clockword orang.J. Human Evol., 22: 327–340.Google Scholar
  14. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, K. Hayasaka, &S. Horai, 1990. Mitochondrial DNA evolution in primates.J. Mol. Evol., 31: 113–121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasegawa, T., 1990. Sex differences in ranging patterns. In:The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies,T. Nishida (ed.), Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, W. C. O., 1969. The nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution of chimpanzees. In:The Chimpanzees,G. H. Bourne (ed.), Karger, Basel, pp. 22–49.Google Scholar
  17. Hoelzel, A. R., J. M. Hancock, &G. A. Dover, 1991. Evolution of the cetation mitochondrial D-loop region.Mol. Biol. Evol., 8: 475–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kocher, T. D. &A. C. Wilson, 1991. Sequence evolution of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. In:Evolution of Life,S. Ohsawa &T. Honjo (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, pp. 391–413.Google Scholar
  19. Lander, E. S., 1989. DNA fingerprinting on trial.Nature, 339: 501–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. ————, 1991. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application.Amer. J. Human Genet., 48: 819–823.Google Scholar
  21. Lynch, M., 1988. Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.Mol. Biol. Evol., 5: 584–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. ———— &W. Gabriel, 1990. Mutation load and the survival of small populations.Evolution, 44: 1725–1737.Google Scholar
  23. Morin, P. A., 1992a. Population Genetics of Chimpanzees. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  24. ————, 1992b. Reproductive strategies in chimpanzees. In:Population Genetics of Chimpanzees, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego, pp. 6–90.Google Scholar
  25. ————,J. J. Moore, R. Chakraborty, &D. S. Woodruff, 1992. Levels of simple sequence repeat allelic diversity at community and species levels in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). In:Population Genetics of Chimpanzees, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego, pp. 136–162.Google Scholar
  26. ————, ————,J. Wallis, &D. S. Woodruff, 1992. Paternity exclusion in a wild community of chimpanzees using hypervariable simple sequence repeats. In:Population Genetics of Chimpanzees, Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of California, San Diego, pp. 111–135.Google Scholar
  27. ————, ————, &D. S. Woodruff, 1992a. Identification of chimpanzee subspecies with DNA from hair and allele specific probes.Proc. R. Soc. London, B249: 293–297.Google Scholar
  28. ————, ————, & ————, 1992b. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation within and between chimpanzee subspecies. In:Population Genetics of Chimpanzees, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of California, San Diego, pp. 163–191.Google Scholar
  29. ———— &O. A. Ryder, 1991. Founder contribution and pedigree inference in a captive breeding colony of lion-tailed macaques, using mitochondrial DNA and DNA fingerprint analyses.Zoo Biol., 10: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———— &D. S. Woodruff, 1992. Paternity exclusion using multiple hypervariable microsatellite loci amplified from nuclear DNA of hair cells. In:Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories,R. D. Martin,A. F. Dixson, &E. J. Wickings (eds.), Karger, Basel, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
  31. Nishida, T., 1979. The social structure of chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds), Benjamin/Cummings Publ., Menlo Park, pp. 73–121.Google Scholar
  32. ————, (ed.), 1990. The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and Life History Strategies. Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  33. Orrego, C., E. Prager, P. Smith, P. A. Morin, S. Woodward, F. Villablanca, M. Fisher, P. Barber, S. Mack, J. Nielsen, B. Best, W. Rainey, & T. Smith, in prep. Versatility of Chelexmediated DNA extraction for sequence amplification.Google Scholar
  34. Pesole, G., E. Sbisa, G. Preparata, &C. Saccone, 1992. The evolution of the mitochondrial D-loop region and the origin of modern man.Mol. Biol. Evol., 9: 587–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pusey, A. E., 1979. Intercommunity transfer of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds.), The Benjamin/Cummings Publ., Menlo Park, pp. 465–480.Google Scholar
  36. ————, 1980. Inbreeding avoidance in chimpanzees.Anim. Behav., 28: 543–552.Google Scholar
  37. Queller, D. C. &K. F. Goodnight, 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers.Evolution, 43: 258–275.Google Scholar
  38. Seal, U. S. &N. R. Flessness, 1986. Captive chimpanzee populations — past, present, and future. In:Primates. The Road to Self-sustaining Populations,K. Benirschke (ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
  39. Smouse, P. E. &R. Chakraborty, 1986. The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis.Amer. J. Human Genet., 38: 918–939.Google Scholar
  40. Spiess, E. B., 1989.Genes in Populations. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Staub, K. C., D. S. Woodruff, E. S. Upatham, &V. Viyanant, 1990. Genetic variation inNeotricula aperta, the intermediate snail host ofSchistosoma mekongi: allozyme differences reveal a group of sibling species.Amer. Malacol Bul., 7: 93–103.Google Scholar
  42. Sugiyama, Y. &J. Koman, 1979. Social structure and dynamics of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea.Primates, 20: 323–339.Google Scholar
  43. Tutin, C. E. G., 1979. Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 6: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ————,W. C. McGrew, &P. J. Baldwin, 1983. Social organization of savanna-dwelling chimpanzees,Pan troglodytes verus, at Mt. Assirik, Senegal.Primates, 24: 154–173.Google Scholar
  45. Waser, P. M., 1987. A model predicting dispersal distance distributions. In:Mammalian Dispersal Patterns,B. K. Chepko-Sade &Z. T. Halpin (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 251–256.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, A. C., H. Ochman, &E. M. Prager, 1987. Molecular time scale for evolution.Trends Genet., 3: 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ———— &V. M. Sarich, 1967. Immunological time scale for Hominid evolution. Science, 158: 1200–1203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Woodruff, D. S., 1990. Genetics and demography in the conservation of biodiversity.J. Sci. Soc. Thailand, 16: 117–132.Google Scholar
  49. ————, 1992. Genetics and the conservation of animals in fragmented habitats. In:In Harmony with Nature: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tropical Biodiversity, June 6–12, 1990, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malay Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 258–272.Google Scholar
  50. ————, 1993.Non-invasive genotyping of primates. Primates, 34: 333–346.Google Scholar
  51. Wrangham, R. W., 1979. Sex differences in chimpanzee dispersion. In:The Great Apes,D. A. Hamburg &E. R. McCown (eds.), Benjamin/Cummings Publ., Menlo Park, pp. 481–489.Google Scholar
  52. ————, 1982. Mutualism, kinship, and social evolution. In:Current Problems in Sociobiology,Kings College Sociobiology Group (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 269–289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip A. Morin
    • 1
  • Janette Wallis
    • 2
  • James J. Moore
    • 3
  • Ranajit Chakraborty
    • 4
  • David S. Woodruff
    • 5
  1. 1.University of OregonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of OklahomaOklahoma CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA
  4. 4.Center for Demographic and Population GeneticsUniversity of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations