, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 497–508 | Cite as

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Problem seeking versus the bird-in-hand, least-effort strategy

  • E. W. MenzelJr.


Fifteen adult chimpanzees were tested on a series of tasks that differed from standard two-choice object discrimination learning problems in one detail: a third choice was sometimes offered, and it consisted of clearly visible and readily accessible food. Even under conditions where they would have to score 100% on the discrimination learning tasks to get as much food as they could get by taking the “free” food, many of the chimpanzees worked on the problems. Individual differences were large and reliable. Frequency of response to a given problem also varied according to how accurately the animals were performing and increased markedly if the hidden food was made a few grams larger than the free food. The chimpanzees did not rely strictly on a “bird-in-hand” strategy or necessarily always work to get the maximum amount of food with the minimum amount of energy expenditure. Whether this is bad economics or good economics depends on the time scale on which one views adaptation.

Key Words

Discrimination learning Problem seeking Bird-in-hand Least effort Risk-sensitivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnard, C. J. &C. A. Brown, 1985. Risk-sensitive foraging in common shrews (Sorex araneus L.).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 16: 161–164.Google Scholar
  2. Caraco, T., S. Martindale, &T. S. Whittam, 1980. An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences.Anim. Behav., 28: 820–830.Google Scholar
  3. Catania, A. C., 1980. Freedom of choice: A behavioral analysis. In:The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 14,G. H. Bower (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 97–145.Google Scholar
  4. Estes, W. K., 1984. Human learning and memory. In:The Biology of Learning,P. Marler &H. S. Terrace (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Dehlem Konferenzen, Berlin, pp. 617–628.Google Scholar
  5. Goodall, J., 1986.The Chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Hamm, S. L. &S. J. Shettleworth, 1987. Risk aversion in pigeons.J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Processes, 13: 376–383.Google Scholar
  7. Havelka, J., 1956. Problem seeking behavior in rats.Canad. J. Psychol., 10: 91–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hebb, D. O. &H. Mahut, 1955. Motivation et recherche du changement perceptif chez le rat et chez l'homme.J. Psychol. Norm. Pathol., 52: 209–221.Google Scholar
  9. Kagel, J. H., L. Green, &T. Caraco, 1986. When foragers discount the future: Constraint or adaptation?Anim. Behav., 34: 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krebs, J. R., A. I. Houston, &E. L. Charnov, 1981. Some recent developments in optimal foraging. In:Foraging Behavior: Ecological, Ethological and Psychological Approaches,A. C. Kamil &T. D. Sargent (eds.), Garland STPM Press, New York, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  11. Logue, A. W., 1988. Models of self-control: Toward an integration.Behav. Brain Sci., 11: 665–709.Google Scholar
  12. Marler, P. &H. S. Terrace, 1984. Introduction. In:The Biology of Learning,P. Marler &H. S. Terrace (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  13. McFarland, D. J., 1977. Decision making in animals.Nature, 269: 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGrew, W. C., 1975. Patterns of plant food sharing by wild chimpanzees. In:Proceedings of the Symposia of the 5th Congress of the International Primatological Society, Nagoya, 1974,S. Kondo,M. Kawai,A. Ehara, &S. Kawamura (eds.), Japan Science Press, Tokyo, pp. 304–309.Google Scholar
  15. Menzel, E. W., 1969. Responsiveness to food and signs of food in chimpanzee discrimination learning.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 68: 484–489.Google Scholar
  16. ————, 1974. A group of young chimpanzees in a one-acre field. In:Behavior of Nonhuman Primates, Vol. 5,A. M. Schrier &F. Stollnitz (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 83–153.Google Scholar
  17. ———— &W. A. Draper, 1965. Primate selection of food by size: Visible versus invisible rewards.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 59: 231–239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Osborne, S. R., 1977. The free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon: A review and analysis.Anim. Learn. Motiv., 5: 221–235.Google Scholar
  19. Rumbaugh, D. M., E. S. Savage-Rumbaugh, &M. T. Hegel, 1987. Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).J. Exp. Psychol., Anim. Behav. Processes, 13: 107–115.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. W. MenzelJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations