Advertisement

Hydrotechnical Construction

, Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 695–699 | Cite as

Questions concerning the economic grounds for ranking scientific-research studies in the field of hydraulic construction

  • M. F. Skladnev
  • G. O. Levit
Discussion

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The concentration of efforts expended by scientific collectives for the scientific studies most critical to the national economy (in our case, for complex hydraulic construction) is urgently needed to encourage the development and implementation of methods of quantitative economic evaluation of the ranking of scientific-research studies according to their importance.

     
  2. 2.

    In this paper the studies that we conducted and discussed in the area of ranking scientific-research studies for hydraulic construction indicate the expediency of using a combination of two methods for quantitative economic evaluation-reduced costs and expert evaluation.

     
  3. 3.

    The indicators, their characteristics, and point values must be selected on the basis of information derived from analysis of data on the actual efficiency of the knowledge-planning-construction-operation system, and also data on the prediction of subsystem and branch development over the next 15–20 years.

     
  4. 4.

    The point values of the indicators employed to rank scientific-research studies are then confimed and defined more precisely by the method of expert evaluation with the participation of all interested organizations.

     
  5. 5.

    It is necessary to develop and approve standards for the coefficient μ.

     

Keywords

Energy Source Power Generation Economic Evaluation Scientific Study Power Engineer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    S. I. Golosovskii, Savings Realized from Research and Development [in Russian], Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Dobrov, “Method of selecting alternate schemes of promising scientific-technical solutions,” in: The Organization of Scientific Researches in Industry and Their Efficiency [in Russian], Kiev (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. M. Kolodin and N. A. Samarov, Principles of Planning Scientific-Research and Experimental-Structural Studies Using Grid Models [in Russian], Kiev (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. A. Lakhtin, Economic Methods for the Administration of Scientific-Research Activity and the Industrial Implementation of Its Results [in Russian], Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foreign Experience in Organizing and Managing Scientific Researches and Developments, Collection of Papers, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Administrative Problems Associated with Scientific Researches, Collection of Papers, Moscow (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. I. Shchedrina, Improving the Planning of Scientific Researches by Rating Their Significance [in Russian] Kiev (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. I. Kudoyarov, “Administrative questions concerning scientific researches in solving engineering problems,” Izv. VNIIG, Vol. 109 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Civil Engineers 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Skladnev
  • G. O. Levit

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations