Skip to main content
Log in

Role of some physical characteristics in species recognition by pigtail monkeys

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three adult pigtail monkeys pressed a lever to see pictures of pigtail and Japanese monkeys with a variety of physical features being removed. The features included head, tail, body, background, and color. The duration and the interval of exposure of these visual stimuli were dependent upon subjects' responding. Preferences for those pictures were evaluated by the ratio of lever-pressing duration to interval of lever-pressing. Two of the subjects showed a consistent preference to see pictures of pigtail monkeys over those of Japanese monkeys. Though this preference tended to maintain when these physical features were removed, it became relatively weak when head and head + tail were removed. These results suggest that pigtail macaques may discriminate species based not on a single characteristics but on some combination of features, and that head may be relatively important than the other features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernstein, I. S. &T. P. Gordon, 1980. Mixed taxa introductions, hybrids and macaque systematics. In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarelli, B., 1973. Check-list of Catarrhina primate hybrids.J. Human Genet., 2: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaria, C. &B. Thierry, 1988. Responses to animal stimulus photographs in stumptailed macaques (Macaca arctoides).Primates, 29: 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fooden, J., 1980. Classification and distribution of living macaques (Macaca lacépède, 1799). In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H., 1971. Implications of sensory reinforcement. In:The Nature of Reinforcement,R. Glazer (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 151–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, K., 1987. Species recognition by five macaque monkeys.Primates, 28: 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1989a. Species recognition by macaques.Biol. Sci., 41: 1–12. (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1989b. Species recognition in nonhuman primates.Jap. Psychol. Rev., 32: 66–89. (in Japanese with English Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1990. Species preference by infant macaques with controlled social experience.Int. J. Primatol., 11: 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1993. Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience.Primates, 34: 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &T. Matsuzawa, 1986. A new procedure to study the perceptual world of animals with sensory reinforcement: recognition of humans by a chimpanzee.Primates, 27: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higley, J. D., W. D. Hopkins, R. M. Hirsh, L. M. Marra, &S. J. Suomi, 1987. Preferences of female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) for infantile coloration.Develop. Psychobiol., 20: 7–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, G. B., 1966. Studies of sensory reinforcement. In:Operat Behavior,W. K. Honig (ed.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 109–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyes, R. C. &D. K. Candland, 1987. Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regions of the face.J. Comp. Psychol., 101: 345–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa, T., 1981. Sensory reinforcement: a variety of reinforcers.Jap. Psychol. Rev., 24: 220–251. (in Japanese with English Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &K. Fujita, 1981. Behavioral analysis of sensory reinforcement in infant Japanese monkeys in terms of time allocation.Jap. J. Psychol., 51: 351–355. (in Japanese with English Summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovee-Collier, C. K. &M. J. Gekoski, 1979. The economics of infancy: a review of conjugate reinforcement. In:Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 13,H. W. Reese &L. P. Lipsitt (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 195–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, G. P., 1970. Unlearned responses, differential rearing experiences, and the development of social attachments by rhesus monkeys. In:Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 1,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, K. B., 1983. Species discrimination in infant pigtail macaques with pictorial stimuli.Develop. Psychobiol., 16: 219–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ———— &L. A. Rosenblum, 1980. Operant responding by bonnet macaques for color videotaped recordings of social stimuli.Anim. Learning Behav., 8: 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N., 1951.The Study of Instinct. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikubo, S., 1985. Species discrimination and concept formation by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Primates, 26: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1987. A possible reproductive isolation through a species discrimination learning in genusMacaca.Primate Res., 3: 43–47. (in Japanese with English Summary)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Fujita, K. Role of some physical characteristics in species recognition by pigtail monkeys. Primates 34, 133–140 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381384

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381384

Key Words

Navigation